Energy

Huff 'n' puff geothermal fracking: Earth batteries at 200% efficiency

Huff 'n' puff geothermal fracking: Earth batteries at 200% efficiency
Combining a pressure battery with geothermal power could unlock both cheap energy storage and shallow geothermal power
Combining a pressure battery with geothermal power could unlock both cheap energy storage and shallow geothermal power
View 7 Images
Combining a pressure battery with geothermal power could unlock both cheap energy storage and shallow geothermal power
1/7
Combining a pressure battery with geothermal power could unlock both cheap energy storage and shallow geothermal power
Fluid is pumped in to expand the rock fracture, then let back out under high pressure to recover energy
2/7
Fluid is pumped in to expand the rock fracture, then let back out under high pressure to recover energy
As a pressure battery alone, this solution is quite efficient
3/7
As a pressure battery alone, this solution is quite efficient
A two-well system with a heat exchanger promises a "multi-cylinder engine" storing energy at 200% efficiency
4/7
A two-well system with a heat exchanger promises a "multi-cylinder engine" storing energy at 200% efficiency
Various parameters of the system change throughout the day
5/7
Various parameters of the system change throughout the day
Field testing is now complete in Starr county, Texas
6/7
Field testing is now complete in Starr county, Texas
The system can be expanded either by creating more vertical fractures off a horizontal underground pipe, or by drilling more wells
7/7
The system can be expanded either by creating more vertical fractures off a horizontal underground pipe, or by drilling more wells
View gallery - 7 images

Sage Geosystems has pioneered a new form of cheap energy storage that uses the Earth as a giant bellows, pumping water into underground fractures, then letting it squirt back up at 70% efficiency – or 200% efficiency if you also harvest heat energy.

The "huff & puff" method, as it's known, is adapted here from a similar technique that's used in oil production, where a fluid – often steam – is injected into a shale oil deposit and left there for several hours to heat the oil, reducing its viscosity and making it easier to pump out.

Sage, however, uses dense drilling mud, forced at high pressure into rock deep underground at disused oil wells, to push slim fractures apart, then pumps water in, again at high pressure, to keep the fractures "inflated." This is done using excess renewable energy collected during daylight hours, and then a valve is closed to lock the water in.

Fluid is pumped in to expand the rock fracture, then let back out under high pressure to recover energy
Fluid is pumped in to expand the rock fracture, then let back out under high pressure to recover energy

When it's time to recover the energy, it's as simple as opening the valve; the pressure from the earth all around the fracture squeezes it back together and the water is forced back up the pipes, where it can be run through a turbine to harvest electricity. Indeed, the same electric motor and pump that forced it down there in the first place become the turbine and generator that get the energy back out when the system runs in reverse.

As a pressure battery alone, this solution is quite efficient
As a pressure battery alone, this solution is quite efficient

This is the "EarthStore" system Sage has now tested using an old oil well in Texas, demonstrating a round trip efficiency of 70-75%, with measured fluid losses of just 1-2% and no detected induced seismic activity. A single well, says Sage, can generate around a 3-megawatt maximum output this way if it's used as a load-following fast release system, or it can release energy in a more measured way to provide 18-odd hours of power through the night when solar isn't generating.

But if you've got access to old oil production shafts, fairly deep in the Earth, there's another benefit: heat. A huff & puff system like EarthStore could be profitable enough as a grid-level or local energy storage system, but once you start factoring heat into the equation, it starts looking extremely compelling.

Revolutionizing Renewable Energy: Geothermal Energy Storage for a Sustainable Future

The Earth warms up the deeper you go, and it's relatively easy to get deep enough for 180-220 °C (350-430 °F) temperatures. It's not typically cost-effective to harvest that geothermal energy, but the huff & puff energy storage system significantly changes the numbers.

The EarthStore system packs water in with hot rock, with lots of surface contact, and locks it down there. So when it's released, not only does the heat increase the pressure with which the water rushes back up, driving the turbine harder, there's also the opportunity to harvest that heat by running it through a heat exchanger, such that you end up getting more energy out of your "Earth battery" than you put in.

That's not the end of it, either; Sage proposes that if multiple EarthStore bores are sunk close to one another, saving money since the drilling equipment and whatnot don't need to be disassembled for transport, you can group them up to operate as multi-cylinder heat/pressure engines.

A two-well system with a heat exchanger promises a "multi-cylinder engine" storing energy at 200% efficiency
A two-well system with a heat exchanger promises a "multi-cylinder engine" storing energy at 200% efficiency

In this kind of array, you'd release the hot water from one underground reservoir, cool it using a heat exchanger to harvest electricity, and immediately store it by pumping the cool water straight down the well next door. No above-ground fluid storage is required, and the process can run back and forth between these two cylinders.

Sink 18-20 of these puppies at a single site, and you've got yourself a 50-megawatt renewable energy storage plant that effectively outputs twice the energy you put in, according to Sage. You can look at it as enhanced energy storage, or as a way to make relatively shallow geothermal energy much more economically feasible, but it's a very neat idea.

Sage says the EarthStore solution alone should be cheaper in terms of Levelized Cost of Storage (LCoS) than lithium-ion batteries or pumped hydro – indeed, as a way to firm the power grid during peak periods, it promises to be cost-competitive with a gas-fired peaker plant.

The Texas pilot program has now wrapped up after six months. It made use of an exploratory oil well, using perforations at 7,920 and 11,140 feet (2,400 and 3,400 m) deep to create a 3,200-ft (1-km)-high, 200-300-ft (60-90-m)-wide fracture.

Field testing is now complete in Starr county, Texas
Field testing is now complete in Starr county, Texas

The walls of this fracture were only 0.1-0.2 in (2.5-5 mm) apart, but by pumping water in and releasing it, and constantly maintaining enough pressure in the system to prevent the fracture from closing, the volume of the fracture expanded and contracted by a factor of two, fluctuating between 7,500-15,000 barrels (1.2-2.4 million liters, 315,000 to 630,000 gallons).

“We have cracked the code to provide the perfect complement to renewable energy, yielding reliable alternative baseload in a manner that is cost competitive with lithium-ion batteries and natural gas peaker plants,” said Cindy Taff, CEO of Sage Geosystems, in a press release. “The opportunities for our energy storage to provide power are significant – from remote mining operations to data centers to solving energy poverty in remote locations. We can interconnect with power grids or develop island/microgrids with a cleaner energy solution that is proven and ready to scale.”

With investment on board already from drilling specialists Nabors Industries and cleantech VC fund Virya, Sage is looking to raise a further US$30 million in its current Series A round, and get on with proving, commercializing, optimizing and scaling the system.

Check out a video below.

Introduction to Sage Geosystems 2022

Source: Sage Geosystems

View gallery - 7 images
6 comments
6 comments
windykites
This is confusing. @0:15 it says demand is low when energy is produced. So, when is demand high? Is it lower at night? Solar is only there during daylight. Wind is unreliable.
I imagine that fracking expands the ground. This has to go somewhere. Earthquake possibilities?
Ryan The Red
If life was a Bond movie, this would be the villain's earthquake machine.

@windykites. Traditionally, electricity was cheap at night because coal plants can't throttle down. Now electricity is cheap mid-day because that's when solar produces so much. Demand peaks at around 7pm, when everyone is cooking dinner, doing laundry, and watching TV. Wind is intermittent, not unreliable. It's always blowing somewhere.
PAV
Brilliant!
notarichman
demand is high during summers in the afternoon -- AC use. It continues until house demand drops. TVs don't take much energy. Lights now take less due to LEDs.
during the winter the demand is high all the time in cool climates (they are getting warmer??). solar energy isn't as available in the winter in my area --clouds and less
sunshine. aluminum factories take an enormous amount of energy and they try to run them during low demand periods. However, a lot of aluminum factories have
closed down due to less available energy and high costs. Oklahoma has lots of small earthquakes, probably due to fracking. So i don't see how drilling these holes and
pumping with high pressure wouldn't also produce earthquakes. If the Texas area didn't produce earthquakes; then maybe they should try using Oklahoma as a test
site? Or better yet, drill for oil somewhere and pump the fluid down to force the oil out after the fluid heats up, making the oil less viscous. when the oil stops coming
out, they could just use the pumping stations to produce energy instead of oil.
TechGazer
How long did their test run "without induced seismic activity"? A steel wire can be bent a few times without breaking, but that doesn't mean it can keep being bent without breaking. Fatigue-cracking bedrock daily is likely to have some undesired effects. What are the effects on groundwater and toxin mobility? If a few decades down the road you find that you've got hydrocarbon and toxic metals flowing rapidly into the groundwater reservoirs, you can't just pump some patching compound down all those wells.

I noticed that it's only "cost competitive with lithium-ion batteries". Batteries have dropped dramatically in cost over the last few years, and will probably continue to drop, and don't have potentially disastrous long-term effects. Clever idea, but too many unknowns. Similar to the initial excitement over fission power: Clean! Safe! No probems at all!

Another issue: noise. I lived near a wellsite with a pump. That was %^@$##$ noisy! I had to complain, and they had to do noise reduction, which was only partially successful. Based on the storage capacity, there would probably be lots of wells converted to this, many of which would be near homes. Obviously the companies will lobby for minimal regulations about noise. I forsee lots of angry people. Battery storage--cost competitive without factoring in the unknown potential costs of this new technique--is quiet, and can be held in a small building in a neighbourhood, or buried with a park over it.

This huff-puff needs extensive long-term testing before it could be approved for deployment. Of course, in the several decades that would take, battery costs will drop and other options will be developed too. I wouldn't invest in it.
CoachFerg
Another issue not addressed in the article is the erosive effect of the universal solvent - water. Each ingress and egress of water from the fractures will dissolve the minerals in those fractures. I get that there is the eternal search for something for nothing. But there's the unicorn endless solar energy meme that keeps raising its ugly head.

Nuclear is the clear answer in the present, but people scream Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, and that stupid movie "China Syndrome" while clutching their pearls.