Energy

Sodium-iron battery startup to challenge Li-ion for extended storage

Sodium-iron battery startup to challenge Li-ion for extended storage
Manufacturing partner, Horien, in Switzerland has so far been producing sodium metal chloride batteries in factories like this, but will also take on production of Inlyte's sodium-iron batteries
Manufacturing partner, Horien, in Switzerland has so far been producing sodium metal chloride batteries in factories like this, but will also take on production of Inlyte's sodium-iron batteries
View 2 Images
Manufacturing partner, Horien, in Switzerland has so far been producing sodium metal chloride batteries in factories like this, but will also take on production of Inlyte's sodium-iron batteries
1/2
Manufacturing partner, Horien, in Switzerland has so far been producing sodium metal chloride batteries in factories like this, but will also take on production of Inlyte's sodium-iron batteries
Inlyte hopes to commercialize its sodium iron batteries for long-duration energy storage in the US in 2027
2/2
Inlyte hopes to commercialize its sodium iron batteries for long-duration energy storage in the US in 2027

We've long relied on lithium-ion batteries for long-term energy storage, but they can be expensive to produce and maintain over the years. California-based startup Inlyte wants to offer a scalable alternative with its sodium-iron battery tech, and it'll soon manufacture cells to showcase its benefits.

The idea behind sodium-iron batteries has been around for decades. Beta Research, an outfit in the UK, pioneered this technology back in the 1970s for use in electric vehicles, but it didn't take off – and lithium-ion took the lead instead. Several years later, Stanford graduate Antonio Baclig chose to run with sodium metal halide battery designs in his effort to create a utility-grade energy storage solution, and launched his own firm to commercialize it.

Inlyte looked at Beta Research's work developing this tech and acquired the latter's team and facilities. In 2023, the startup raised US$8 million in seed funding to pursue its ambitions. Now, it's inked a deal with Horien Salt Battery Solutions to scale up production of sodium-iron batteries at a facility in the US, and bring these long-duration storage batteries to market.

Inlyte hopes to commercialize its sodium iron batteries for long-duration energy storage in the US in 2027
Inlyte hopes to commercialize its sodium iron batteries for long-duration energy storage in the US in 2027

The big draw of sodium-iron batteries is in the name: they're made of two highly abundant materials, which means they could cost as little as $35 per kWh when manufactured at scale. That's a fraction of what you'd pay for lithium-ion batteries, which are around $139 per kWh.

Sodium-iron batteries are also durable, can operate and be safely shipped in any climate, pose low fire risks, and promise between 6-24 hours of energy storage. In comparison, lithium-ion storage batteries generally offer about 4 hours of storage duration.

Inlyte has also demonstrated its cells managing over 700 cycles with no loss in energy capacity, and claims a battery life of at least 7,000 cycles, or 20 years. That could give lithium-ion-based storage options like Tesla's Megapack a run for their money.

By partnering with Horien, Inlyte hopes to throw open the doors to its first US-based battery factory by 2027. The company has already been testing its tech at a pilot plant in the UK; manufacturing in the US with Horien's expertise could accelerate its ambition to commercialize its cells and sign up customers in the near future.

Source: Inlyte via PR Newswire

3 comments
3 comments
michael_dowling
This technology is sure to succeed,as the article suggests,due to the low cost of ingredients,and the fact that weight/size are irrelevant in stationary applications. Iron-air batteries are much closer to rollout,with the advantage of being able to support the grid for several days during power failures,unlike Li-ion,which has a backup ability measured in hours.
rgbatduke
Sounds great, but it is always next year for non-LiO etc batteries. The article doesn't say what the energy density is, though, and I always wish articles would come with a cost-benefit analysis. For example, say my power bill is $200/month and I pay $0.20 per kWh, so I consume 1000 kWh/month. Divide by 30, I need roughly 33 kWh/day. Multiply by $35, bump it a bit for luck and installation, and say it costs $1500 to buy whole house storage that could be refilled by rooftop solar and ALMOST remove all need to stay connected to the grid, double or triple that -- why not, it is cheap now compared to the cost of the cells themselves -- and I could pretty much go off the grid altogether nearly all of the time with power backed up to spare to cover rainy stretches. My $200/month, however, kills the cost of the hard store amortized over well under a year. I could buy it with a credit card and still be in the black as far as ROI is concerned within a year per 1000 kWh, including usurious interest.
BUT, how big is it, per 1000 kWh? Are we talking the size of my oversize AC condensors? The size of a small car? An SUV? Does it need special housing, or cooling when operating? Is this a REAL competitor for compact power-dense Li batteries or will it only drive single seater cars because all of the cargo space in a pickup-truck sized vehicle is battery? Also (to a lesser extent) what is its weight? Can it go in the attic? In the house's crawlspace (otherwise wasted footprint, pretty much)? Or does it need a chunk of my lawn and/or garden?
Until these questions are answered, its commercial potential is hard to assess. Many of the answers mean that it is useful to utilities or large corporations as a load-leveling "capacitor" that can soak up cheap off-peak kWh and deliver them back in peak (at the cost of acres of very heaving units on concrete sidling up to the acres of solar appearing everywhere) but NIMBY, which is where I'd really like them. If the answers are even close to positive, this could indeed be a game changer for rooftop solar. Otherwise it is just another way of doing something we can already do, with its own special negative trade-offs that make it useless to me personally.
Ivar
You compare highest 2023 price (139USD/kWh, 2023 price, probably high end type) to a "could be as low as 35kWh" (not in full production yet) The same(?) Bloomberg reference dropped to just over 100USD/kWh, in the 2024 edition. Prices are still dropping sharply. And you can put them in cars 'stuff...