Environment

UCB demonstrates "incredibly cheap and easy" carbon-capture material

UCB demonstrates "incredibly cheap and easy" carbon-capture material
Researchers have developed a whole new family of solid-state materials – malamine nanoporous networks – which spontaneously capture CO2, and could be used to capture emissions from
Researchers have developed a whole new family of solid-state materials – malamine nanoporous networks – which spontaneously capture CO2, and could be used to capture emissions from smokestacks or tailpipes
View 2 Images
Researchers have developed a whole new family of solid-state materials – malamine nanoporous networks – which spontaneously capture CO2, and could be used to capture emissions from
1/2
Researchers have developed a whole new family of solid-state materials – malamine nanoporous networks – which spontaneously capture CO2, and could be used to capture emissions from smokestacks or tailpipes
The new material adsorbs carbon dioxide quickly and selectively, and releases it later for sequestration when slightly heated
2/2
The new material adsorbs carbon dioxide quickly and selectively, and releases it later for sequestration when slightly heated

UC Berkeley chemists say they've created a simple, and very inexpensive way to capture carbon dioxide using a polymer called melamine, that's far cheaper than metal-organic frameworks. It could capture carbon emissions from smokestacks or tailpipes.

Some 75% of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States come from fossil fuel burning, and while the race to zero emissions by 2050 is primarily focused on replacing fossil fuel use with cleaner, electrified solutions, carbon capture is definitely going to play an important role.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOF), have shown significant promise in this area. The complex shapes of these crystalline structures offer the largest surface area of any known material, and CO2 molecules become trapped in these structures as other molecules pass through.

UC Berkeley researchers created the first carbon-capture MOF back in 2015, and have since refined it to higher levels of efficiency – but for carbon capture tech to be widely deployed, it needs to be super-simple and extremely cheap. "We wanted to think about a carbon capture material that was derived from sources that were really cheap and easy to get," said Professor Jeffrey Reimer, one of the corresponding authors of a new research paper published in the journal Science Advances. "And so, we decided to start with melamine."

Melamine powder costs about US$40 per ton. It's a very common material and a key constituent in things like thermosetting plastics, laminates, whiteboards and wipe-clean Formica kitchen benchtops. The research team combined it with formaldehyde and cyanuric acid, and used a 3- to 7-day condensation polymerization technique, followed by a sonication bath and a cleaning process to create stabilized melamine nanoporous networks.

The new material adsorbs carbon dioxide quickly and selectively, and releases it later for sequestration when slightly heated
The new material adsorbs carbon dioxide quickly and selectively, and releases it later for sequestration when slightly heated

These networks, according to the team, demonstrated a high adsorption capacity of 1.82 millimoles of CO2 per gram at atmospheric pressure levels. They adsorbed the carbon quickly – within minutes – and showed "extraordinary cycling stability and low regeneration energy." The new material captures CO2 at about 40 °C (104 °F) and releases it at 80 °C (176 °F)

In essence, the researchers argue that this first run at melanine nanoporous networks performs the carbon capture job roughly as well as the first MOFs designed for the job seven years ago – with great potential for improvement and at a far cheaper cost.

There remains the problem that melanine production itself is currently a CO2-emitting process, but the researchers believe this new material could have broad applications in emissions capture. "This work creates a general industrialization method towards sustainable CO2 capture using porous networks," said Haiyan Mao, a UCB Postdoctoral fellow and lead author on the paper. "We hope we can design a future attachment for capturing car exhaust gas, or maybe an attachment to a building or even a coating on the surface of furniture."

"All the practical aspects at the laboratory scale of this material for CO2 capture have been met, and it's just incredibly cheap and easy to make," said Reimer.

The research is open access in the journal Science Advances.

Source: UC Berkeley

3 comments
3 comments
Robert
Carbon capture was around for decades, and no large scale project delivered anything close to what was promised. At this point it seems to be fig leaf allowing oil industry to keep kicking ball down the road pretending they are working on problem they caused, allowing to disappear once profit stream run dry.

This material seem to be working like sponge. But what to do with captured co2? There was no claim that it is carbon emission/capture positive if it is used for storing co2 permanently.
pbethel
How much energy is expended making it compared to how much it captures?
And, much like the dog chasing the car, what do you do with it once you've caught it?
Karmudjun
Great article Loz. And I see the nay-sayers found it!
While $40/ton is a great price for a rapid CO2 scavenging material, the whole process needs to be inexpensive and a built in storage-utilization infrastructure must be available. Oil companies already built up THEIR infrastructure, but the CO2 sequestration system has always been too expensive, too bulky, and too complicated. How do the current technologies compare to the efficiency & cost of old coal fired power plant smokestack scrubbers or other relevant means of reducing pollutants? Without comparisons other than the MOF's and vague future improvements - there are too many questions left unanswered - and un-asked. But it is nice to see progress in research even if it is at UC Berkeley, hehehe