Environment

"Phantom chemical" identified in drinking water is new to science

"Phantom chemical" identified in drinking water is new to science
Scientists have identified a mysterious "phantom chemical" that's long been suspected to exist in treated drinking water in some regions
Scientists have identified a mysterious "phantom chemical" that's long been suspected to exist in treated drinking water in some regions
View 2 Images
Scientists have identified a mysterious "phantom chemical" that's long been suspected to exist in treated drinking water in some regions
1/2
Scientists have identified a mysterious "phantom chemical" that's long been suspected to exist in treated drinking water in some regions
An illustration of the structure of the newly identified molecule
2/2
An illustration of the structure of the newly identified molecule

Plumbed drinking water in developed countries is pretty clean, but invisible contaminants can still lurk. One mysterious “phantom chemical” has haunted drinking water for decades, and now researchers have identified it – and found it’s completely new to science.

Water is often chlorinated to disinfect it, which has proven effective at eliminating most waterborne pathogens but it can create by-products that are harmful to human health. A related compound, chloramine, was found to not only produce fewer of these by-products but also lasted longer. As such, it’s commonly used in the US and some other regions.

Chloramine, however, is not without its own by-products. Chemical analysis has long been found to reveal that about five to 10% of the expected nitrogen disappears, locked up in some other molecule that evaded direct identification for decades.

Now, scientists have finally pinpointed this strange “phantom chemical.” It’s called a chloronitramide anion, which is a negatively charged molecule made up of one chlorine atom, two nitrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms.

The researchers synthesized and isolated the chemical, then analyzed it with high-resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, to reveal its properties.

An illustration of the structure of the newly identified molecule
An illustration of the structure of the newly identified molecule

Next, they measured the concentrations of these anions in different water systems in the US that are treated with chloramines. They detected it at levels of up to 100 micrograms per liter, which is higher than the regulation limits of 60 to 80 micrograms per liter that’s usually allowed for disinfection by-products.

Direct toxicology studies have yet to be conducted on the compound, but the team says the analyses do suggest that chloronitramide anion is not entirely benign.

“I agree that a toxicological investigation of this anion would be useful now that we know its identity, but I am not overly worried about my tap water,” says Oliver Jones, Professor of Chemistry at RMIT. “The compound in question is not newly discovered, just newly defined. Its presence in some (not all) drinking waters has been known for over 30 years."

“The question is whether the substance is toxic at the amount we are exposed to,” Jones continues. “I think here the answer is probably not. Only 40 samples were tested in this study, which is not enough to be representative of all tap water in the USA and the concentration of chloronitramide was well below the regulatory limits for most disinfection by-products in the majority of samples.”

Whether or not it’s unsafe, identifying the mysterious chemical after all this time is an important step. The research was published in the journal Science.

Source: University of Arkansas via Scimex

9 comments
9 comments
Brian Beban
The big test is how many people are getting sick or killed by the drinking water- not many I suspect, compared to drinking out of a contaminated puddle or river.
Jose Gros-Aymerich
Huge discovery!
They used saying, American people didn't drink tap water if lacking the chlorine smell.
Well, chlorine smell in tap water comes from the presence of organic products; a good, crystal clear tap water has no smell at all.
Blessings +
MKO
I'm sticking with my well water.
Jinpa
Then there is the concern about what causes bubbles in what is supposedly safe drinking water when you fill a glass. Ordinary stream water doesn't do that.
Karmudjun
Nice article Michael. I am not familiar with how long our water as been treated with chloramine, I know presentations always referto a "chlorinated" water supply. As a physician, I wonder about the increased awareness of dementia progression. Americans are living longer so there is more time to present with symptoms, yet we have hypothesized it might be PFA's and such predisposing us to increased incidence of dementia. I hope investigations of the effects of chloronitramide anion on the gut biome and blood brain barrier in humans begin soon! Brain Beban & Jose Gros-Aymerich - NOT SO! Annoying tap water odors are off-putting to most Americans, including the chlorine smell, and surviving to take another drink doesn't preclude the long term effects we have seen in water supplies over the past 150 years.
Mindbreaker
My outdoor cats will take dirty rainwater over tap, every time. I think the things we are adding are the wrong things. We need to give up adding fluoride because it is a neurotoxin. If you want it on your teeth, use toothpaste with it, there is no benefit to ingestion, and I would claim, harm. If it hurts developing fetuses, that is enough info for me. Should be enough info for anyone who cares about children and their future. At the same time, people have been getting less and less iodine because they are not buying the iodized salt, and not putting iodized salt in their food. The salt they use in prepackaged food is not iodized. And the pink salt from Pakistan has no meaningful amount of iodine, if any. Iodine is only in salt if it is added. That only happens in iodized salt. Iodine also has antibacterial qualities. I would add some iodine to the water instead of chlorine. Also, in places where there is some lithium naturally in the water, there are far fewer murders and suicides per capita. Nothing like a medical dose, just a small amount. There is pretty good evidence that it is a nutritional requirement at very low dose. Probably somewhere between 0.5 mg and 5 mg a day. Earring on the lower end would be fine. 0.5 mg/gallon should be doable.
I realize the small amount of Iodine we need is likely insufficient to kill all the bacteria, but there are other ways to treat the water, such as ultraviolet light, and oxygen. And there are other minerals that are beneficial, like potassium chloride...again, in small amounts. If the city pipes just are not sealed well...fix it.
DonnaAnita
I like that Professor Oliver Jones is worried about his tap water but not "overly" so; at least, sounds like there is some cause for worry. I only use New Zealand sourced water for drinking, cooking and for my hummingbirds and the stray cat that comes around. I particularly appreciated reading Mindbreaker's comments and I think that tap water should be healthy to drink and not adulterated. Tap water needs to be added to the long list (mainly, I think, fluoride) of harmful or potentially harmful environmental influences, e.g., insecticides, pesticides, auto fumes, certain food additives, dyes, preservatives, certain cosmetic and drug constituents, and more I can't remember right now. But it is quite a load to be exposed to, isn't it, when you add them all up together, which we mostly all are almost every day.
John
How many people in the past drank well water without testing from the gov't? Remember the movie "Incredible Shrinking Woman"? I have wondered for years what kind of problems we are incurring from unknown combinations of chemicals in our environment. There needs to be many different studies into the effects of different chemicals and combinations thereof.
Christian
If the option is "maybe this might be bad for you" vs "river water is DEFINITELY bad for you"...I'll happily take my chances. Disinfected tap water has been an incredible miracle of modern science and civilization. Clean water has probably saved MILLIONS of lives, if not BILLIONS, even if not perfect.

We're on a well right now and all that comes with that (you should see the clay and minerals that come through and get caught in the filter), but I never had worries about city tap water, and this doesn't make me worry any more about it. My in-laws live in an area where even their deep artesian well water has salt-water intrusion and high levels of sodium in it.

If it's nearly clean, it's way better than drinking out of a river or lake. My chickens can drink the dirty puddles all they want, but I'm not going to