ESA to host workshop aimed at cleaning up low-Earth orbit

ESA to host workshop aimed at ...
This workshop and others like it could be the key to making the space industry more environmentally sustainable (Image: ESA)
This workshop and others like it could be the key to making the space industry more environmentally sustainable (Image: ESA)
View 1 Image
This workshop and others like it could be the key to making the space industry more environmentally sustainable (Image: ESA)
This workshop and others like it could be the key to making the space industry more environmentally sustainable (Image: ESA)

Key orbits frequented by GPS and communications satellites are becoming more and more hazardous, as man-made debris presents an increasingly palpable danger to the valuable assets orbiting at heights of around 2,000 km (1,243 miles) above the Earth. That' s why the European Space Agency (ESA) is hosting an international workshop geared towards cleaning up low-Earth orbit, with a focus on how to make the space industry more sustainable.

The sheer number of orbital debris present in low-Earth orbit is proliferating at an alarming rate. As a race, we have only had the capability to launch objects into orbit since 1957, and yet already there are already 12,000 pieces of debris larger than 10 cm (3.9 inches) cluttering up low-Earth orbit, and this number reaches into the millions for smaller un-trackable detritus.

The risk, even from very small pieces of debris, is not to be underestimated or dismissed simply because of the sheer scale of low-Earth orbit. Collisions, whilst very rare do happen. In 2009, a collision between the American Iridium 33 and the Russian-made Kosmos-2251 created a vast cloud of potentially devastating space junk. It was a piece of debris from this collision that forced the International Space Station to take a precautionary evasive maneuver back in November 2014, firing the thrusters of the docked Automated Transfer Vehicle (the Georges Lemaître) in order to avert a potentially catastrophic situation.

The seriousness of the debris problem has led space agencies such as ESA to invent ever-more innovative solutions for clearing low-Earth orbit. The agency has come up with a number of conceptual solutions, including missions to harpoon and net debris, with the objective of de-orbiting the junk in a safe and controlled manner.

However, reducing the amount of junk in orbit is not the only way that agencies are attempting to reduce our footprint on low-Earth orbit. The design of new satellites and launch vehicles are now closely legislated so as to cut down on unnecessary debris from, for example, the upper stages of rockets. Similarly, any new satellite being launched into an orbit of around 2,000 km (1,243 miles) must have the capacity when it reaches the end of its operational life, to either de-orbit itself using onboard thrusters, or to push itself into a higher, less valuable orbit.

The ESA-hosted workshop will give companies an opportunity to showcase their own innovative solutions for low-Earth orbit debris removal. More importantly, it demonstrates that the space industry is prepared to step up to the plate, making the orbital environment a priority before our impact becomes too great.

The event will be hosted at ESA's technical center in Noordwijk, Netherlands on March 17 and 18.

Source: ESA

I'd wager it's less damaging to leave the junk there, rather than try remove it, because the mass of propellant exhaust expelled to remove the junk will be orders of magnitude more. Sure, smashing into a cloud of gas is less immediately damaging than a chunk of debris, however, the probability of the gas-impact is much *much* higher, and the damage that's going to do to the orbit and life expectancy of the craft will be far more severe, averaged out, than the (rare) chance of debris hit - not to mention the fact that compensating for the gas friction will require expulsion of even more gas, exacerbating the problem!
Space around earth is so fragile, that both blobs *and* molecules of "junk" are all "dangerous" (remember - we're not talking "human death" danger, we're talking "machine life expectancy" danger here; 2 very different things.
Martin L Hedington
I would have though this would be a viable application for a mega-massive cushion of carbon aero-gel to be placed up there, wouldn't cost much to get it there, or bring it down again for that matter. A 'vessel' could actually be made from it, then floated/ propelled up with say an inert gas and solar propulsion.
Stephen N Russell
Need Orbital Recovery Modules mini boosters to shoot debris into Sun or Deep Space OR Lunarside for reuse from orbital Lunar recovery modules
Richard D. McDowell
I read a scify book some time ago about an alien ship returning Marilyn Monro to her home...and when they got here the planet was unaprochable due to the debris. A ship came out of the polar gap to approach. Anyone else read this? Do you think we could lock ourselves out with junk ?
Joseph Boe
Bussard Ramscoop.
Boom. Done.
You're welcome.