Robotics

EU move to bring in AI laws, but reject robot tax proposal

The EU believes that legislation is urgently needed to manage the speedy introduction of driverless cars
The EU believes that legislation is urgently needed to manage the speedy introduction of driverless cars
View 1 Image
The EU believes that legislation is urgently needed to manage the speedy introduction of driverless cars
1/1
The EU believes that legislation is urgently needed to manage the speedy introduction of driverless cars

The European Parliament has voted on a resolution to regulate the development of artificial intelligence and robotics across the European Union. Based on a raft of recommendations drafted in a report submitted in January to the legal affairs committee, the proposed rules include establishing ethical standards for the development of artificial intelligence, and introducing an insurance scheme to cover liability for accidents involving driverless cars.

"The EU needs to take the lead on setting these standards, so as not to be forced to follow those set by third countries," the parliament announced in a statement. The members specifically noted that legislation is urgently needed to manage the speedy introduction of driverless cars in order to legally clarify responsibility in the case of accident.

Not every element in the broad-ranging report was accepted by the Parliament though, with a recommendation to institute a "robot tax" roundly rejected. The robot tax proposal was designed to create a fund that manages the repercussions and retraining of workers made redundant through the increased deployment of industrial and service robots.

Minister Mady Delvaux, who authored the initial report, expressed disappointment that certain coalitions in the Parliament rejected the taxation proposal. "They rejected an open-minded and forward-looking debate and thus disregarded the concerns of our citizens," she said.

But those in the robotics industry were supportive of the Parliamentary rejection, with the International Federation of Robotics suggesting to Reuters a robot tax would have been harmful to the burgeoning industry, stifling innovation and competitiveness.

The European Parliament passed the resolution comfortably with 396 votes to 123, with 85 abstentions.

There still is a bit of a process before any hard and fast laws are established, with the proposals now moving through to the executive branch of the Union, the European Commission. The Commission is not legally obliged to institute the Parliament's recommendations but it must state fair reasons for anything that's rejected.

Source: European Parliament News

3 comments
Bob Flint
Who exactly is rushing for self driving cars? Oh yeah the automotive industry trying to milk us out of more money, by offering a service under the guise of improving automotive fatalities currently plaguing society as we become ever increasingly un-aware of our surroundings due in large part to the digital addiction so many people already have succumb to...Yup time for a Mega solar flare EMP us back to the day when we actually saw, spoke, and respected one another..
Nairda
The UN would not be doing this unless we are close to something. Scary times.
Daishi
Look at how much automation and large industrial robots are used in manufacturing already today. Those companies still employ tons of human workforce but they are more productive. Where do you draw the line between a robot that replaced a human and a robot that made a human more productive? This is a nearly impossible task and what about all the humans employed to create, program, and support/maintain the robot? Doesn't that significantly alter the figures for out of work humans? It wold be enormously complex to accurately estimate how much human labor was replaced by the robot and how much was displaced (many into higher paying jobs programming/building robots). The red tape it would require to accurately estimate how much human labor each robot needs to be taxed against would make Sarbanes-Oxley seem trivial. The analysis required alone would destroy the competitive advantage of companies involved. It would require a massive amount of red tape.
Thanks for reading our articles. Please consider subscribing to New Atlas Plus.
By doing so you will be supporting independent journalism, plus you will get the benefits of a faster, ad-free experience.