Materials

Coal plant waste helps build environmentally-friendly, cementless concrete

Coal plant waste helps build e...
A scanning electron microscope image of fly ash particles, which have been used to make an environmentally friendly binder for concrete production that requires no cement
A scanning electron microscope image of fly ash particles, which have been used to make an environmentally friendly binder for concrete production that requires no cement
View 2 Images
The Rice researchers used type C fly ash, which has a higher calcium content than the more commonly-used type F
1/2
The Rice researchers used type C fly ash, which has a higher calcium content than the more commonly-used type F
A scanning electron microscope image of fly ash particles, which have been used to make an environmentally friendly binder for concrete production that requires no cement
2/2
A scanning electron microscope image of fly ash particles, which have been used to make an environmentally friendly binder for concrete production that requires no cement

Concrete production is one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide emissions in the world, after transportation and energy. To make the ubiquitous building material more environmentally friendly, the industry has been adding by-products from coal-fired power plants, but doing so had its own problems. Now, researchers at Rice University have developed a new composite binder that can almost completely replace cement, and reduce waste from power plants at the same time.

Fly ash is made up of the loose, airborne particles created as coal is burned in power plants. This material is usually captured, and while some is recycled, most ends up in landfill. Concrete is one of the main uses of recycled fly ash, since binders based on that waste material don't need the same high-temperature, energy-intensive processing that Portland cement does. In turn, that cuts back on the emissions generated during concrete production, plus it can also make the resulting concrete stronger and more resistant to corrosion.

But most of these mixtures only use a relatively small amount of fly ash, and worse, it requires larger amounts of sodium-based activators. That can cancel out both the environmental and cost benefits.

"The industry typically mixes five to 20 percent fly ash into cement to make it green, but a significant portion of the mix is still cement," says Rouzbeh Shahsavari, co-author of the study. "And in the end it was more expensive than cement."

The Rice researchers used type C fly ash, which has a higher calcium content than the more commonly-used type F
The Rice researchers used type C fly ash, which has a higher calcium content than the more commonly-used type F

Using Taguchi analysis, the Rice researchers were able to determine the most effective recipe and mixing strategies for their new composite. That allowed them to settle on an optimal balance of about 80 percent fly ash, five percent of a sodium-based activator, and the rest made up of nanosilica and calcium oxide. The mixture is completely free of Portland cement, the team says.

The type of fly ash used is key. Most other projects use what's known as type F fly ash, rich in silicon and aluminum. The Rice team however used type C, which has a higher calcium content.

"A majority of past works focused on so-called type F fly ash, which is derived from burning anthracite or bituminous coals in power plants and has low calcium content," says Shahsavari. "But globally, there are significant sources of lower grade coal such as lignite or sub-bituminous coals. Burning them results in high-calcium, or type C, fly ash, which has been more difficult to activate. Our work provides a viable path for efficient and cost-effective activation of this type of high-calcium fly ash, paving the path for the environmentally responsible manufacture of concrete."

In tests, concrete made using the new fly ash binder was found after seven days to have compressive strength of 16.18 MPa, which is comparable to conventional concrete made with Portland cement.

While these early results are promising for a more environmentally friendly concrete that's just as strong as the regular stuff, the team says it plans to further investigate the properties of the new material, including its long-term behavior, shrinkage and durability.

The research was published in the Journal of the American Ceramics Society.

Source: Rice University

4 comments
SimonClarke
Doing some research the other day I found that cut up wind turbine blades makes great concrete filler. Most wind turbines from the 80's and 90's are replaced with more efficient units and moved to new locations on farms etc. Modern, more efficient, blades are not as robust and after a lifetime of use can, in some instances, not be suitable for relocation. These blades can be cut up into small pieces and used as hard core for concrete. it is one possible way of using discarded plastic instead of it becoming landfill.
pATREUS
Concrete manufacturers should dig up volcanic ash: volcanic particles have far more surface area than these little spherules. The Romans exploited it; their Pozzolana was far better than any concrete mix we can produce today.
ljaques
I hope all that fly ash is checked for uranium (more radioactivity is released into the atmosphere by coal burning power plants than all nuclear plants), heavy metals, and other hazards before it's made into anything humans interact with. Testing is still under way.
christopher
No numbers. "Better" is technically correct if it's 0.00000001% better, or also if its 999999999 times better - so this article doesn't tell us anything useful to compare with.