Apple likes simplicity. It has a simple product line with simple brand names, simple designs and simple-to-use software. This obsession has served the company well. But there is one area where it could afford to have just a bit more complexity. I’m talking iPhone screen size. Apple’s rivals have shown that one size most definitely does not fit all. It’s time for Apple to join them and stop pretending that it does.
You might have caught a recent story from CNET, laying out yet another analyst’s Apple prediction. Brian White of Topeka Capital Markets had a meeting with someone in the supply chain, and he walked away confident that Apple is indeed shifting to multiple screen sizes for the next iPhone.
If his sources are legit, then I say “hooray.”
One size doesn't always fit all
Let’s be honest. The iPhone 5 looks piddly next to every recent high-end Android phone. Sure, you could say that Apple’s handset is still more comfortable to hold, and more easily slips into a pocket.
But that line is growing old. Spend five minutes with the Galaxy Note 2 and you’ll realize that huge screens can also have huge advantages. Not ready for a phablet? Fine, then snag a slightly smaller phone like the Galaxy S4, HTC One, or Nexus 4.
Bigger? Sure. Ridiculously uncomfortable to hold? Not for everyone.
Learning from Samsung
Apple isn’t dominating in quite the same way as it used to. Comscore tells us that Apple still sells the most smartphones in the U.S., but, on last check, Samsung was handily outselling Apple on the global market.
Apple is still profiting wildly, and is hardly in danger. But that doesn't mean Samsung isn't also doing something very, very right.
One of the things Samsung does is sell devices in every screen size imaginable. Sammy makes small smartphones, big smartphones, phablets, small tablets, large tablets – and anything in between. Call it the “throw every display size against the wall and see what sticks” method.
Apple would never muck up its product line by doing that. Samsung is “try everything,” Apple is “we secretly tried everything behind closed doors – and this is what we think is the best.” Different companies, different approaches.
But Apple can learn something from Samsung’s public experimentation. Namely, lots of people like big-ass smartphones.
The most important part
Back in 2010, when Steve Jobs was pitching the iPhone 4’s Retina Display, he gushed about a device’s display being the most important part. It’s the window into everything that you do. And he was right.
But this applies not just to crystal-clear resolution, but also to size. Humongous smartphones let you do so much more. The window into your virtual world of apps, games, and social networking is bigger. It’s easier to peek through. You can see more of it without incessant pinching and zooming.
So why doesn’t Apple just make the next iPhone five inches and call it a day? Because these big-ass smartphones aren’t for everyone. And that’s okay. People have different tastes, and Apple needs to stop pretending like there’s one answer for everyone.
iMacs come in multiple screen sizes. MacBooks do too. Hell, even the iPad now comes in two different sizes. It’s not as if Apple doesn’t get choice. It just hasn’t yet applied it to the iPhone.
Bring it on
So let’s get on with it, Apple. Bring on the multiple screen sizes. Not everyone wants an Apple phablet, but many do. Not everyone wants a 4.7-inch iPhone, but many do.Because you know what? Not everyone wants a 3.5-inch or 4-inch iPhone. That's nice that Apple decided for us that 3.5 and 4 inches are the best sizes for smartphones. Many potential customers beg to differ. And right now, they're taking their business to Samsung.
Make the move, Mr. Cook. You don't have to throw simplicity out the window. Nobody walks into an Apple Store, and leaves utterly confused by the choice of iPad or iPad mini. No, they're happy that they have a choice, and they ultimately make the one that's best for them.
It's quite simple, really.
I'm a bit torqued that Apple has been trying to jam the one-size-fits-all smart phone concept at us since the first iPhone. Apple needs to wake up now (years later than they should have).
I hated having to wear glasses to see anything on my iPhone but that's no longer a problem with the S3. I would definitely consider re-purchasing an iPhone that can rival the S3's screen size. Apple needs to break down their corporate walls and unleash what their fans would really love to "see." And yes, I love Apple products, as evidenced by my desktop, laptop, iPad, and iPod.
Just more of Apple deciding what the consumer "wants" instead of paying attention to what the consumer actually wants. Remember in the 90's when each size of Macintosh monitor could only do a single resolution and had a large black border on the screen? That was so the display would always be 72 DPI, exactly matching the then common 72 DPI print output. The concept soon became obsolete with the rise of higher resolution printing and nobody ever actually holding up a print to their screen to do a comparison - but Apple kept on with that well past when it made any sense.
AFAIK Palm OS was the first to come on 480x640 screen, but only on a few devices.
There are still new Android phones coming out with 320x240 screens with a fixed keyboard on the cheap end and even some with that resolution and auto rotation with a slider keyboard. Next step up is 480x800 with a few outliers going even wider. Above that there's a wide range of resolutions, but sadly the highest ones aren't being paired with slider keyboards and even the sliders we do get in the USA have hobbled hardware compared to the EU and/or asian versions of the same phone.
I want a phone like the Photon Q, but with a quad core CPU, double all the types of memory, a 720p display and a removable battery. The other half of the planet is allowed to have such phones, but not the West.
The rigidity of design is too much. The newer phone keypad looks worse than the original but why not let the user decide upon the color?
That should be so easy to do and we should be allowed to determine the order of opening an app like the phone. Why should I have to tap tap tap to get where I really want to be. One tap should be enough, let the user determine the order of the opening sequence.
Sure would be nice to have a home screen designed to my liking.
Inconsistent flexibility is irritating.
The calendar is dumb, regardless of what Steve said. It really is just plain dumb. Why can't Apple come up with a great calendar? Huh? This is a lemming job when we need brilliance. C'mon Johnny start humping!
Being an Architect of course I want a Bauhaus/Italian Modern/Swiss aesthetic.
But I really don't see it here.
While the i41CX+ is fantastic, more can be don than simply put together a hideous morphed display. Shame on AAPL of that crappy job.
And where is the software to compete with those hideous TI Calculators where the Teacher gets to see what everyone is doing and can administer lessons and tests? Anything happening along those lines? Nah forget the school market? Right? NO WRONG!
What's going on in the textbook world, is AAPL doing anything along those lines? So for me there is much more to come up with and I don't see it happening.
Certainly larger iPhones would be great for the kids in the class room setting but I guess we have just passed on that one.
So for me this is shape up time, let's see some stuff that's great, incomparable.
And get rid of those damn ugly icons like the so called "Contatct" BS. People are people, contacts? Maybe and maybe not. Insulting it is.
There really should be a good scheduling CPM/Pert program developed by not, Hell Primavera and Microsoft don't know how to do it!
So the so called guru's are really screwing up in my book.
Bill
Adding to that, the newer S4 and Note II stomp the hell out of the Iphone 5 and if I wanna spend another hundred on the smart dock, I can use it as a desktop computer.
If the Contact's icon doesn't bother you, then you need to have your visual cortex checked out.
Don't tell me that AAPL can't do better than that. If they can't don't sit around hoping your stock holdings will rise again.
Bill