Space

Liquid lake on Mars might be evidence the Red Planet is still volcanically active

Liquid lake on Mars might be e...
A visualization of the south pole of Mars, where a huge lake of liquid water is believed to have been found last year
A visualization of the south pole of Mars, where a huge lake of liquid water is believed to have been found last year
View 1 Image
A visualization of the south pole of Mars, where a huge lake of liquid water is believed to have been found last year
1/1
A visualization of the south pole of Mars, where a huge lake of liquid water is believed to have been found last year

Last year we got some big news from the Red Planet – a huge lake of liquid water was apparently found beneath the ice at the Martian south pole. Building on that, a new study has now examined how it might have gotten there, and concluded that there has to be an underground heat source for water to pool there. For that to happen, Mars must have had volcanic activity much more recently than is normally believed, and may even still be active today.

Discovered using radar instruments onboard the Mars Express orbiter, the liquid lake sits under 1.5 km (0.9 mi) of solid ice, and stretches 20 km (12.4 mi). It's far from fresh though: huge amounts of sodium, magnesium and calcium salts are thought to be dissolved in it, which keeps it in a liquid state at temperatures well below water's usual freezing point.

But, the new study suggests, salt alone can't be solely responsible – there must have been some source of heat for the lake to form in the first place. And buried under that much ice, the heat could really only come from below. Here on Earth, liquid water pools under ice sheets thanks to heat from magma under the crust.

Decades of observations have shown that Mars was once a very volcanically active place, but it's generally believed to have been pretty quiet for the last few million years. For a lake of that size to still be present today, the researchers calculated that there must have been volcanic activity within the last 300,000 years or so, with magma collecting in a chamber some 10 km (6.2 mi) below the surface. And with activity that recently, geologically speaking, there's a chance it's still happening now.

"This would imply that there is still active magma chamber formation going on in the interior of Mars today and it is not just a cold, sort of dead place, internally," says Ali Bransom, co-lead author of the study.

Of course, the team acknowledges that the original discovery of the lake may have been the result of misinterpreted data, so there's a possibility that there is no water down there at all. But for the new work the researchers started by assuming there was, then working backwards to determine the conditions necessary for it to exist. And they are plausible.

If there is water on Mars, it could help cut back on the resources that future astronauts need to take with them, as well as fundamentally changing our understanding of the chances of extraterrestrial life on Mars or any other planet.

"We think that if there is any life, it likely has to be protected in the subsurface from the radiation," says Bramson. "If there are still magmatic processes active today, maybe they were more common in the recent past, and could supply more widespread basal melting. This could provide a more favorable environment for liquid water and thus, perhaps, life."

The research was published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Source: American Geophysical Union

3 comments
SimonClarke
I was surprised to lean that Mars still has a molten core but also the Moon. While not on the scale of the Earths core subsurface heat could be used as an energy source.
BrianK56
There has been talk of how difficult it would be to make the water safe for consumption. If there is 0.9 mile of ice covering it we use the ice instead for our water needs.
Nik
This 'water' will be of no use for decades, until some simple and cheap way to retrieve it, bring it to the surface, without it freezing in the pipe on the way up, and then desalinating it. This would require enormous energy resources. So, its of no use to any proposed settlers in the foreseeable future, if it even exists! If the ''Electric Universe'' theories are correct, and the visible erosion on Mars has far more in common with those theories, rather than the theorised water erosion, then the surface water of Mars was burned off by enormous interplanetary electric arcs. As one who has worked as a welder, the curious, as yet unexplained, ''blue berries'' that exist by the trillions on the surface of Mars are the epitome of 'weld spatter.' In my opinion, the only really immediately effective source of water would be orbiting ''icebergs'' from the asteroid belt, if they can be found and manoeuvred into Mars orbit, and then brought down in a semi controlled way.