Materials

3D-printable concrete alternative hardens in three days, not four weeks

3D-printable concrete alternative hardens in three days, not four weeks
According to the scientists, the new material "surpasses 17 megapascals, the strength required of residential structural concrete, in just three days, compared to as long as 28 days for traditional cement-based concrete"
According to the scientists, the new material "surpasses 17 megapascals, the strength required of residential structural concrete, in just three days, compared to as long as 28 days for traditional cement-based concrete"
View 2 Images
Asst. Prof. Devin Roach at work in his lab
1/2
Asst. Prof. Devin Roach at work in his lab
According to the scientists, the new material "surpasses 17 megapascals, the strength required of residential structural concrete, in just three days, compared to as long as 28 days for traditional cement-based concrete"
2/2
According to the scientists, the new material "surpasses 17 megapascals, the strength required of residential structural concrete, in just three days, compared to as long as 28 days for traditional cement-based concrete"

Although we've heard a lot about how 3D-printing concrete homes speeds up the construction process, you still have to wait up to 28 days for the concrete to sufficiently cure. A new printable substitute, however, is ready to go in just three days.

Concrete consists of three parts: water, an aggregate such as sand or gravel, and a cement which binds everything together. The cement is the part that typically takes about a month to cure after being poured. And a slow curing time isn't cement's only problem.

Traditional Portland-style cement is made by grinding up limestone and other raw materials, then heating the resulting powder to temperatures of up to 1,450 ºC (2,642 ºF). Unfortunately, the processes by which that heat is generated produce a lot of carbon dioxide.

What's more, as the heated limestone forms into cement via a process known as calcination, it releases trapped carbon dioxide as a byproduct. The combination of that CO2 and the CO2 produced in the heat-generating process is estimated to be responsible for 5% to 8% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.

That's where the new 3D-printable material comes in.

Created by Asst. Prof. Devin Roach, doctoral student Nicolas Gonsalves and colleagues at Oregon State University, it's composed mainly of clay soil infused with hemp fibers, sand and biochar. The latter is a charcoal-like material produced via a process called pyrolysis, in which heat is used to decompose wood chips and other organic material in the absence of oxygen.

Importantly, instead of Portland cement, the new material utilizes a thermally-triggered acrylamide-based binding agent. In a chemical reaction known as frontal polymerization, that agent initiates the curing process as soon as the mixture is extruded from the printing nozzle. This makes it strong enough to be printed over unsupported gaps, such as the tops of window openings.

Asst. Prof. Devin Roach at work in his lab
Asst. Prof. Devin Roach at work in his lab

"The printed material has a buildable strength of 3 megapascals immediately after printing, enabling the construction of multilayer walls and freestanding overhangs like roofs," says Roach. "It surpasses 17 megapascals, the strength required of residential structural concrete, in just three days, compared to as long as 28 days for traditional cement-based concrete."

And although it can be built upon in three days, it fully cures in eight to 10 days, reaching a strength of over 40 megapascals.

The scientists are now working on bringing the cost of the material down, as it's currently pricier than its conventional counterpart. A paper on the research was recently published in the journal Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials.

Source: Oregon State University

10 comments
10 comments
Gibby
Concrete achieves its full strength in 28 days, when a contractor casts a house foundation the footings are cast first usually. Then the wall forms are set up the NEXT day, NOT 28 days later. After 2-3 days of setting up the foundation wall formwork the walls are cast, usually the forms are stripped 2 days later, the day after the forms come off the traditional wood framing is started, NOT 28 days after the walls are cast. By the time the house is framed and in a Lock-Up stage (all doors and windows in) the concrete has reached its 28 day strength.
Brian Beban
I hear what Gibby is saying. However, this article appears to be about a fully printed concrete house dispensing with the traditional wooden framing and replacing it with extruded/printed concrete walls, both interior and exterior. The ability to cast / pour/print across the tops of windows and doors, as well as across interior walls for bracing, is far superior to the current practice of printing up to the height of those walls/openings but not spanning those spaces. I hope they get it cheap enough to compete, especially with the complicated cement making process being eliminated for such printed structures.
Lamar Havard
It would be nice if someone could build a printer that used mixed plastic waste instead of this stuff or concrete. But I guess there's not many plastics that are structurally compatible when melted together. I know there's companies making plastic 'LEGO'-type blocks and others, but this could eliminate the forming and stacking.
Thrips
"Importantly, instead of Portland cement, the new material utilizes a thermally-triggered acrylamide-based binding agent..." Citing the Material safety data sheet of (unpolymerized) Acrylamide: Hazard statements: H301 Toxic if swallowed H312+H332 Harmful in contact with skin or if inhaled H315 Causes skin irritation H317 May cause an allergic skin reaction H319 Causes serious eye irritation H340 May cause genetic defects H350 May cause cancer H361f Suspected of damaging fertility H372 Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure. This changes when fully! polymerized, but who wants to work with this mess on a construction side?
Doug Lough
Although this is interesting the author has written misinformation about concrete. Concrete hardens by the next day and controlling harden for years to come. What it does is reaches its design strength in 28 days and can reach its design strength sooner if formulated to do so. A standard house foundation can be worked on within days of pouring because the full weight(design weight) will not be achieved for months to come.
TechGazer
Watch this become yet another hazardous waste problem in the future. Acrylamide-carbon-clay nanoparticles anyone? Is printing houses on-site really more economical or greener than other alternatives, or is it just a fad seeking investment?
1stClassOPP
Any thought to using a paper machete material? Recycled paper, a glue of some kind, and you’re good to go, insulation, strength and using waste material.
jeremiah.mckenna@yahoo.com
It would be helpful if the comment section had a reply button so that we could reply to comments.
jeremiah.mckenna@yahoo.com
As a builder, this article has too many plot holes. What this horribly concocted toxic sludge(read the safety data sheet) does is only being used on 3d printed houses and is only being compared to current 3d printed houses, as stick built houses on concrete slabs or slabs with lower foundation walls made of concrete, typical of houses with basements. Those house foundations are typically built upon within 2 to 5 days after being poured and forms removed. The process of 3d printing as it is now is likened to a baker squeezing decorative frosting/icing through the piping bag and nozzle. One layer is placed as the 3d nozzle head moves around and slowly builds the walls, one layer at a time. The current method uses a steel lintel or precast lintel over door/window openings to support the weight of the material above that opening. Currently, once that level of wall is built, it must dry and cure before the next level of walls is built. Apparently, with this newntoxic sludge, the drying and curing process is dramatically less. Also, it may appear that a precast or steel lintel is not going to be used. I am not completely sure. I personally would not trust a lintel free structure of even one story, because we all know that houses settle and have the potential to crack, no matter what the material is.
Is faster better? It can be, but at what cost? In this case, it seems the cost is toxicity and possibly questionable structural integrity.
RandomPerson465
What if we just mass produce concrete panels that can be put in place at a moments notice