Body & Mind

Anti-aging drug extends life up to 25%, staves off frailty and disease

Scientists are on the cusp of treatments to help us live longer and healthier
Scientists are on the cusp of treatments to help us live longer and healthier

For the first time, scientists have demonstrated how a specific protein increases in our organs as we get older and actively promotes the aging process. By blocking this activity, it could not only help us live longer, but slow the physical decline that is, right now, an inevitable part of aging.

Researchers at Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore have previously undertaken three different studies to examine interleukin-11 (IL-11) protein expression and its role in heart and kidney, liver and lung health. The lattermost research has led to an experimental anti-IL-11 therapy that's currently in clinical trials to treat fibrotic lung disease.

Building on this work, the team identified IL-11's role in the aging process, with its increased production leading to fat accumulating in the liver and abdomen, as well as reduced muscle mass and strength. By blocking this protein expression, these hallmarks of aging could be drastically reduced.

"This project started back in 2017 when a collaborator of ours sent us some tissue samples for another project," explained first author Anissa Widjaja, an assistant professor at Duke-NUS. "Out of curiosity, I ran some experiments to check for IL-11 levels. From the readings, we could clearly see that the levels of IL-11 increased with age and that's when we got really excited."

In a preclinical mouse model, the researchers found that deleting this protein provided protection against age-related decline, frailty and disease. Deleting the IL-11 gene in mice extended the lives of the animals by an average of 24.9%. When mice were given an anti-IL-11 therapeutic at 75 weeks of age (the equivalent of around 55 human years) until death, the average lifespan of male mice was increased by 22.5% and 25% in female mice.

The mice didn't just live longer, they were shielded from key signs of aging. Anti-IL-11 therapy boosted metabolism, with the animals producing calorie-burning brown fat, not problematic stores of white fat, blocked the loss of muscle mass and strength, and protected against multimorbidity and cardiometabolic diseases.

"Despite average life expectancy increasing markedly over recent decades, there's a notable disparity between years lived and years of healthy living, free of disease," said Professor Thomas Coffman, Dean of Duke-NUS. "This discovery could be transformative, enabling older adults to prolong healthy aging, reducing frailty and risk of falls while improving cardiometabolic health."

Cancer is a leading cause of death in old mice, and autopsies in this study showed that inhibiting IL-11 expression significantly reduced this disease. (Clinical trials of an anti-IL 11 drug in combination with immunotherapy for cancer is in the pipeline.)

The therapy also benefited cell health across the board, reducing the rate of telomere shortening – which occurs every time a cell divides – and keeping the powerhouse mitochondria functioning efficiently. With an anti-IL-11 therapy already in the early phases of testing for fibrotic lung disease, the researchers have been pleased with its safety profile.

"Our aim is that one day, anti-IL-11 therapy will be used as widely as possible, so that people the world over can lead healthier lives for longer," said senior author Stuart Cook, Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine at the SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center. "However, this is not easy, as approval pathways for drugs to treat aging are not well-defined, and raising funds to do clinical trials in this area is very challenging."

However, this may be one of the most promising treatments yet, as scientists continue their search for anti-aging's holy grail. It's estimated that slowing down the aging process in a way that increases life expectancy by a single year would be valued at US$38 trillion.

The study was published in the journal Nature.

Source: Duke-NUS Medical School

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
8 comments
Jinpa
Does it reduce or reverse signs and effects of aging, or just prevent further effects? How often would it have to be given, and in what dosage(s)? Who will patent this, and what will the producer(s) charge?
fredricwilliams
Government would be reluctant to encourage research that would increase the cost associated with maintaining the health and welfare of the aged. A 25% increase in life expectancy would more than double Social Security payments in the US and would have a similar effect in most industrialized welfare states.

Nevertheless, it would perhaps extend the productive years if that were to become culturally accepted.
paul314
I'm surprised that it's difficult to raise money for clinical trials. You're talking about a potential market of a billion or more people a year, many of them well off.
Treon Verdery
A way to do this longevization durably, without daily dosing is the modify the epigenetics of interleukin-11 genes so that much much less interleukin-11 is produced. One epigenetic molecule that causes the methylation of DNA and genes to decrease the activity of the genes is RNAi, also called interference RNA. Persons would receive a single dose of RNAi that, like monthlong depot injections of some FDA permitted medications, causes the RNAi to cumulatively epigenetically downregulate the interleukin-11 genes. 24% greater human lifespan could be a single dose event. I estimate the actual $ to manufacture a dose at about 1-2¢.
Brian M
Of course mice are not people, and they have a lot shorter life span, so will there be side effects over long periods? For example with reduction in the rate of telomere shortening, will that increase cancer risk over a longer human life span period?
Uncle Anonymous
Interesting. As a soon-to-be septuagenarian, I wish them the best of luck and hope they bring this to market at a reasonable price sooner, rather than later.
Kiffit
At 76, I have no interest in extending my life so much as keeping the life I do have as capable and fulfilling as possible. That might have the effect of keeping me alive longer, but that would not be the aim. The worst outcome is to be kept alive in ever poorer health for longer than was once thought possible. That puts enormous strain not only on the old person, but the medical and care systems they increasingly need.

In the broader sense, extending life seems to me to produce quite profound existential problems, as in what role if any is there within a family for great-grandparents and what happens to grandparents who have to look after their parents in their seventies and eighties?

I think intergenerationality is a defining aspect of lifespan. Living too long can just as easily become a curse as a satisfaction. What happens when you have 'seen it all' too often? Ennui?.....a kind of existential 'weariness'?
Ranscapture
@Treon Verdery, can you make this work? You said a lot of things I don’t understand, therefore you seem smart, even if you’re making things up, it’s better than I could do. I’ll participate in your trial.

Also, what if we combined this with metformin?