Body & Mind

Maternal sepsis and death greatly reduced by single-dose antibiotic

Maternal sepsis and death greatly reduced by single-dose antibiotic
Maternal sepsis and death in low- and middle-income countries can be reduced by the one-off administration of a common antibiotic
Maternal sepsis and death in low- and middle-income countries can be reduced by the one-off administration of a common antibiotic
View 1 Image
Maternal sepsis and death in low- and middle-income countries can be reduced by the one-off administration of a common antibiotic
1/1
Maternal sepsis and death in low- and middle-income countries can be reduced by the one-off administration of a common antibiotic

According to a recent large, multi-country clinical trial, the risk of postpartum sepsis and death in women who plan to deliver vaginally can be reduced by one-third by administering a single dose of the antibiotic azithromycin.

Azithromycin is a low-cost, broad-spectrum antibiotic that is commonly used to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections such as respiratory infections, skin infections, ear, nose and throat infections and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

Although highly preventable, sepsis is the leading cause of maternal and newborn deaths worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is usually caused by a severe prenatal bacterial infection of the uterus or infection immediately after childbirth and can result in life-threatening organ dysfunction.

The randomized controlled Azithromycin-Prevention in Labor Use Study (A-PLUS) enrolled 29,278 women from low- and middle-income countries who planned to have a vaginal birth. Women were drawn from countries that included Bangladesh, Guatemala, India, Pakistan, and Zambia. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation co-funded the study.

The study found that of those women given a two-gram oral dose of azithromycin during labor, only 1.6% developed sepsis or died in the six-week period after delivery, compared with 2.4% of women in the placebo group. Results also showed that women administered azithromycin were less likely to develop endometriosis and had fewer hospital readmissions and unscheduled visits to health professionals compared to women that received the placebo.

Azithromycin had no noticeable effect on the risk of stillbirth, newborn sepsis, or newborn death, which remained comparable between the azithromycin group (10.5%) and the placebo group (10.3%).

“We hope that our findings will be applied to help improve maternal care in low- and middle-income countries around the globe,” said Alan Tita, MD, PhD, who co-led the trial.

“These findings have the potential to change clinical practice by providing a safe, effective and low-cost approach to reduce the global burden of maternal sepsis and death,” said Dr Diana Bianchi, director of NIH’s National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD), the primary funder of the trial.

"We urgently need effective strategies to prevent pregnancy-related infections, which account for roughly 10% of maternal deaths worldwide," Dr Bianchi said.

The study was recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

Source: National Institutes of Health

3 comments
3 comments
Brian M
Sounds good on the face of it, but giving a single dose of Azithromycin or other antibiotic when not strictly necessary will increase the risk of resistance to antibiotics. Perhaps better monitoring and giving an antibiotic treatment sooner could be a better solution rather than a general dose of antibiotics to all women going for vaginal deliveries. Or perhaps a way of determining which particular births might lead to an increased risk, keeping in mind these are low/middle income countries.
Karmudjun
Since we monitor and test women in their last weeks of pregnancy, this is an excellent NEJM article and a nice synopsis Paul! The standard for cesarean sections is a dose of antibiotic immediately after a good IV access is assured prior to an incision (or shortly thereafter in emergent circumstances). Although vaginal birth infections are rare - OB's test patients in office and OB nurses take a sample upon admission - but what about women who give birth at home? I don't think any physician is going to adopt an "ABX dose for all" approach after this study, but will instead continue with the proven practice of dosing those patients who test positive for a worrisome bacterial colonies in the birth canal. So Brian - thank you for your comment on our standard practice, we will keep to it. And ABX resistance is most impacted by blanket use in corporate animal farming, not in physician's practices.
The Doubter
One need not bother about resistance in case of a single dose. The advantages far outweigh the side effects.