Military

Tactical hydrogen power for US Military

Tactical hydrogen power for US Military
H-SUP powering a communications link
H-SUP powering a communications link
View 6 Images
H-SUP powering a communications link
1/6
H-SUP powering a communications link
H-SUP is designed to supply electrical power to tactical units
2/6
H-SUP is designed to supply electrical power to tactical units
H-SUP modules
3/6
H-SUP modules
H-SUP is claimed to be lighter than batteries
4/6
H-SUP is claimed to be lighter than batteries
H-SUP undergoing field tests with US Marines
5/6
H-SUP undergoing field tests with US Marines
H-SUP is modular
6/6
H-SUP is modular
View gallery - 6 images

The US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) has taken hydrogen tactical, by adapting fuel cell technology for US Marine Corps field units to replace the heavy batteries and generators now used by soldiers to provide electricity.

Napoleon once said that an army travels on its stomach – but in the 21st century, it's more accurate to say that it travels on its batteries. With soldiers relying more and more on personal radios, computer networks, sensors, night-vision goggles, FLIR scopes, advanced rifle targeting scopes and portable drones, they're also increasingly lumbered with bandoliers of batteries or lugging generators and jerry cans of fuel across the hated final mile of rough terrain.

Small wonder so many soldiers on patrol tend to "lose" batteries with such regularity.

To help alleviate this, the NRL is adapting and field testing hydrogen fuel cell technology originally designed for powering small UAVs. Called the Hydrogen Small Unit Power (H-SUP) system, it's intended to provide the same weight savings to Marines as it does to unpiloted aircraft.

H-SUP is claimed to be lighter than batteries
H-SUP is claimed to be lighter than batteries

That may seem a bit of a jump, but UAVs suffer from limited range and endurance – especially if they are electric powered. Because batteries are heavy, weight remains a major factor even in hybrid electric systems. The same is true for Marines slogging over rough country on foot.

In this case, the H-SUP system is similar to the one developed for the hydrogen-powered H2 Stalker program, except that it's been ruggedized and repackaged into a set of waterproof plastic lockers that include the fuel cell, inverter, hydrogen storage, and a charging station for various devices.

H-SUP modules
H-SUP modules

Claimed to be more energy dense and therefore lighter than batteries or a conventional generator, the H-SUP has a power output of up to 1.2 kW. It's also more efficient, quieter, and has a lower heat signature because it works by an electrochemical reaction instead of combustion and has a built-in ethylene glycol-based coolant system, making it more difficult for an enemy to detect. Having fewer moving parts than a generator, it's also easier to maintain with a rating of 5,000 hours of operation.

Its modular construction also means that it's easy to modify for specific missions and it can be hooked into a vehicle's electrical system.

The H-SUP was field tested at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in July 2022, Marine Corps Air Station Yuma in February 2025, and Marine Corps Training Area Bellows in March 2025. In addition, it was tested by the US Army at Fort Polk with the 101st Airborne in May 2025. The results of these tests are being used to improve the system.

H-SUP is designed to supply electrical power to tactical units
H-SUP is designed to supply electrical power to tactical units

"Warfighter feedback is a critical component of the technology development process and will be used to inform requirement definition and future research and development activities,” said Captain Joshua Ashley, U.S. Marine Corps, Expeditionary Energy Office (E2O) Science and Technology Analyst. "The E2O serves as the link between the warfighter and the lab, providing feedback to refine the system and accelerate acquisition.

"H-SUP isn’t just innovative – it increases lethality by keeping us powered and hard to find. We ensure this technology meets the needs of Marines on the ground – quiet, efficient, and reliable power that supports expeditionary operations."

Source: NRL 

View gallery - 6 images
4 comments
4 comments
TechGazer
While it may be (claimed to be) more energy-dense than regular batteries, is there no other fuel that is overall more energy-dense for power generation? I'm guessing this is just the hydrogen proponents trying to get funding.
I did notice that "energy dense" isn't adequately defined. Weight density? Volumetric density? Do the calculations include all factors such as packaging and safety equipment that might be required? Maybe this system has significant risks of leaking H2, requiring alarms and explosion-proof transport vehicles.
Username
So, to avoid carrying fuel for the generators to recharge the batteries they are going to carry pressurized hydrogen tanks to recharge these things?
Aermaco
The ignorance about explosive H2 danger will subside after its use show it to be safer than the heavy vapor liquid fuels explosive danger. FYI A pressurized H2 tank with liquid or vapor will burn like a candle with all its fuel [and fire only if it is ignited] going upward away from the tank and its users. That is not the case with heavy vapor explosive gases.
mediabeing
I'm glad portable energy is being looked at. The sooner we can electrify a town, portably, the better. I'd like to see a reliable variety of power generators from massive sterling engines to energy absorbed through weather's phase changes.