Military

US Space Force funds space-based aircraft carrier for satellite defense

US Space Force funds space-based aircraft carrier for satellite defense
Artist's concept of the Orbital Carrier
Artist's concept of the Orbital Carrier
View 2 Images
Artist's concept of the Orbital Carrier
1/2
Artist's concept of the Orbital Carrier
The Orbital Carrier is an alternative to other platforms like the spaceplane pictured here
2/2
The Orbital Carrier is an alternative to other platforms like the spaceplane pictured here

The US Space Force has a contract worth up to US$60 million to develop and fly a kind-of aircraft carrier in space. No, it's not the result of a major typo. It's intended as a way to station space vehicles to quickly counter orbital threats.

During the last century, as wars raged on the surface of the Earth, space was seen as something of a sanctuary – a safe haven free of conflict. Even during the Cold War and the Space Race, weaponry in space was confined to theory and real-life oddities like the aircraft cannon secretly installed in the Soviet Salyut 3 space station in 1973 to deter curious American visitors.

Today, the picture is very different with Russia and China both pursuing very aggressive policies to develop weapons on both the ground and in space designed to disable or destroy Western satellites. These include radio jammers, laser and microwave weapons, robotic grappling arms, chemical sprays, kinetic kill vehicles and even nuclear warheads that can take out entire constellations of satellites.

The use of any of these weapons is something that any sane commander would wish to avoid. War in space is very different from that on Earth with very different stakes. Even the primitive Soviet gun had surprising limitations. For one thing, you couldn't fire it along the axis of the space station's orbit. If you did, and missed the target, the shell would orbit the Earth and hit the station.

The Orbital Carrier is an alternative to other platforms like the spaceplane pictured here
The Orbital Carrier is an alternative to other platforms like the spaceplane pictured here

The same goes for most other encounters. Satellites don't vanish from the battlefield like a shot-down aircraft or a sunken ship. They continue in orbit, either as a derelict hulk that may contain explosive elements like batteries or fuel tanks or as a cloud of debris. In either case, they could result in a cascade effect of unintended collisions that would cause far more damage than the attacker ever anticipated.

It's for this reason that the Space Force, along with other Western militaries, prefer to concentrate more on deterrence and mitigation. In other words, to make an attack in space to be as unattractive as possible by countering an attack before it happens, reducing hostile effects, or restoring communication or reconnaissance capabilities quickly enough to deny an enemy even a temporary advantage.

To do this, the Space Force needs to have assets in the form of maneuverable spacecraft in orbit at all times – not as individual vehicles, but stored in a mothership that can launch them as needed, rather like the fictional Battlestar Galactica or Babylon 5, though not quite as cool. It's for this reason that Strategic Funding Increase (STRATFI) by SpaceWERX of the Space Force has allocated the new funds to Gravitics, which specializes in building large space structures like outposts, cargo craft, and, now, the Orbital Carrier.

According to the company, the new carrier will allow the Space Force a fast, flexible response to dangerous situations. It will also allow the United States and its allies to maintain space superiority, much as NATO carrier groups maintain freedom of the seas.

A demonstration may be launched as early as next year.

"We're honored to partner with the U.S. Space Force on this critical initiative," said Colin Doughan, CEO of Gravitics. "The Orbital Carrier is a game-changer, acting as a pre-positioned launch pad in space. It bypasses traditional launch constraints, enabling space vehicle operators to rapidly select a deployment orbit on-demand."

Source: Gravitics

3 comments
3 comments
Nelson
It is so sad to think of all the money and resources that have been wasted in preperation for war!
christopher
@Nelson Lucky for you, all those resources, and the people who died for your benefit using them, granted you the freedom today to air your uninformed and disrespectful opinions.
Life as you know it *came* from all this sacrifice. Wake up and notice reality!!
Jeff7
@christopher Yes, war is the best solution. What other ways could be better? I’m glad all my relatives died in foreign fields ensuring our right to make better weapons. The good news - the next war should be spectacular - I’m going to go outside and watch before I die.