Automotive

Rear view cameras to be mandatory in all new cars in the US by 2018

Rearview camera systems will be mandatory on new vehicles in the US from May 2018 (Photo: Shutterstock)
Rearview camera systems will be mandatory on new vehicles in the US from May 2018 (Photo: Shutterstock)
View 1 Image
Rearview camera systems will be mandatory on new vehicles in the US from May 2018 (Photo: Shutterstock)
1/1
Rearview camera systems will be mandatory on new vehicles in the US from May 2018 (Photo: Shutterstock)

Most of the vehicle safety features made mandatory by lawmakers, such as seat-belts and airbags, provide protection to those inside the vehicle. But in a move to protect those outside the vehicle, specifically, in the blind spot behind the vehicle, the US Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued a proposed rule requiring rear view cameras to be installed in all new vehicles under 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) in the US from May, 2018.

According to the NHTSA, every year in the US there are an average of 210 fatalities and 15,000 injuries caused by a vehicle backing over someone. Children under five account for 31 percent of fatalities, with adults over 70 accounting for 26 percent. The efficacy of rear view cameras in reducing the risk of such accidents has long been recognized, and many auto manufacturers have already made such technology standard equipment on many models.

With the new rule to apply to all new vehicles weighing under 10,000 lb (4,536 kg), it will cover passenger cars, SUVs, buses and light trucks. It also sets a minimum field of view for rear view cameras, which must include a 10-ft (3 m) by 20-ft (6 m) zone directly behind the vehicle. However, instead of setting the minimum size for the in-vehicle display or dictating its placement, the NHTSA is adopting a minimum image size requirement – in other words, how large displayed objects appear to the driver.

The NHTSA expects the new rule, which will be final in 60 days of the March 31st announcement, will save 58 to 69 lives each year once the entire on-road vehicle fleet is equipped with systems that meet the specifications outlined.

Source: NHTSA

13 comments
Nairda
Well good. Every little step makes that difference. In our neck of the woods, new laws are coming in such that no new car can be sold that does not have stability control, brake force distribution and ABS. The next one around the corner might just be the law that dictates the minimum number of airbags and where. If everyone has to get on board to sell product they can't sell safety as an option, or offer it only on the 'premium' brands, as if to say the lives of people that earn less are worth less.
Cé hé sin
Why only vehicles under 10,000 lbs? You can see our the back of those! Is those over that weight they should be worrying about!
Mel Tisdale
@ Cé hé sin Good point. Not only is it necessary to cover the rear of the vehicle, but also the side, especially for commercial vehicles when entering a main road at a shallow angle. The rear view mirror does not exist and the side mirrors all too often do not cover the main road enough to let the driver know when it is safe to exit the side road. The need for better all-round visibility on large vehicles is all the more important for vehicles whose base country drives on the opposite side of the road e.g. Mainland European vehicles driving in the U.K. and vice versa.
LowFlyerXX
They shoud have automated view change in rear view mirror. Not sure why only smaller vehicles, I guess, people driving those have the most deaths occurences? Also, add the audible and then we are all safe??
edro3111
Ok. I'm all for saving lives but this government nanny stuff is getting old. How many people were killed last year by backing vehicles? Maybe 15 or 20? Why not proximity alarms that many cars already have on rear bumpers. Nooo, let's jack up the price of a new car by 1000 dollars for a rear mount camera and a dash monitor. Wonder what GOP or Dem Congressmen are secret stockholders in companies that make those camera systems? The Feds are completely into our private lives now. And that is NOT good!
grtbluyonder
Human drivers cause accidents through inattention, texting, drinking, and speeding to mention a few. Robots mandated to replace human drivers by 2025 says NHTSA.
Bryan P
@edro: please read the article before posting. "210 fatalities and over 15,000 injuries" per year. Also, from another article ( http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/31/autos/rear-facing-cameras/index.html ) on this, the estimate was $140 per camera system. Also of note is the property damage (not mentioned by either article) that is caused yearly by people who have trouble reading their mirrors while backing up.
Stephen N Russell
Esp for SUVs, midsize on up alone, almost got into accident since I couldn't see my rear.
CliffG
I'd rather see them require better rear and side visibility.
Buzz Allnight
and these camera and display systems are going to last 150 to 200 thousand miles? I don't think so.....
Thanks for reading our articles. Please consider subscribing to New Atlas Plus.
By doing so you will be supporting independent journalism, plus you will get the benefits of a faster, ad-free experience.