Science

New type of carbon-capturing wood discovered in nature

New type of carbon-capturing wood discovered in nature
A scanning electron microscope image of the microfibrils inside the secondary cell walls of tulip trees
A scanning electron microscope image of the microfibrils inside the secondary cell walls of tulip trees
View 2 Images
A scanning electron microscope image of the microfibrils inside the secondary cell walls of tulip trees
1/2
A scanning electron microscope image of the microfibrils inside the secondary cell walls of tulip trees
The North American species of the tulip tree in bloom in springtime
2/2
The North American species of the tulip tree in bloom in springtime

Tulip trees have been around for millions of years, but a new analysis of their structure has revealed a previously unknown type of wood. The finding could explain why the trees are great at sequestering carbon and help our efforts to do the same.

In the battle to reduce the amount of atmospheric carbon and, as a result, mitigate the effects of greenhouse gasses rapidly warming our planet, trees are a powerful ally. According to the Arbor Day Foundation, a single mature tree can soak up more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the air each year, and an acre of mature trees can absorb the amount of CO2 produced by a car driven 26,000 miles (~42,000 km).

One tree that's particularly good at ridding the air of carbon is the tulip tree, which consists of two species: Liriodendron tulipifera, which proliferates in North America, and Liriodendron chinense, which thrives in central and southern China. These trees are ancient relatives of the magnolia and can quickly grow to be over 100 feet tall.

Recently, researchers from Jagiellonian University (JU) in Poland and the University of Cambridge in England took samples of 33 different tree species from Cambridge University's botanic gardens. They then froze these samples using a nitrogen bath and looked at them under a low-temperature scanning electron microscope. When they got to the tulip tree sample and examined its secondary cell wall, they were stunned to see that they had just stumbled upon an entirely different type of wood.

“The main building blocks of wood are the secondary cell walls, and it is the architecture of these cell walls that give wood its density and strength that we rely on for construction," said lead study author Jan Łyczakowski from JU. "Secondary cell walls are also the largest repository of carbon in the biosphere, which makes it even more important to understand their diversity to further our carbon capture programmes to help mitigate climate change.”

The North American species of the tulip tree in bloom in springtime
The North American species of the tulip tree in bloom in springtime

In all tree species, there are long tube-like fibers found in the secondary cell wall called macrofibrils which hold wood cells. These fibers are made from chains of cellulose and give trees their stability.

During this research, the team found out that angiosperms, which are generally hardwood trees like oaks and cherry, have macrofibrils measuring about 17 nanometers in diameter on average. In gymnosperm trees, which are usually softwoods like pine or cedar, the microfibrils measure 29 nanometers on average. In the case of the tulip tree though, the microfibril diameters came in around 20 nanometers placing it squarely between the two well-known types of wood. The researchers termed this neither hard nor soft wood, "midwood."

Not only do the researchers believe the unique structure of the tulip tree's secondary cell wall is responsible for its fast growth rate, but they think it may have evolved in response to a rapidly declining presence of carbon in the atmosphere about 30 to 50 million years ago. With less carbon dioxide available for use in photosynthesis, the thinking goes, the trees developed these unique cellular structures to hold on to as much of it as possible. That makes them great at helping reduce the overabundance of the gas in our atmosphere today and may help scientists learn how to use trees to an even greater extent to combat climate warming.

“Both Tulip Tree species are known to be exceptionally efficient at locking in carbon, and their enlarged macrofibril structure could be an adaptation to help them more readily capture and store larger quantities of carbon when the availability of atmospheric carbon was being reduced," said Łyczakowski. "Tulip Trees may end up being useful for carbon capture plantations. Some east Asian countries are already using Liriodendron plantations to efficiently lock in carbon, and we now think this might be related to its novel wood structure.”

The research findings have been published in the journal New Phytologist.

Source: University of Cambridge via EurekAlert

7 comments
7 comments
Treon Verdery
It would be nifty to find the 98th percentile most beautiful to humans kinds of trees, then genetically engineer them to have the genetics of high, or very very high diameter microfibrils. That way, something that people love viewing prompts and promotes a greater voluntary amounts of trees planted.
Dave Holland
Hmmmm… “...a single mature tree can soak up more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the air each year, and an acre of mature trees can absorb the amount of CO2 produced by a car driven 26,000 miles”. Cars produce about 0.9lbs of CO2 per mile, so 26,000 miles is ~23,000 lbs, which would require ~490 trees per acre. That is a LOT of trees - Tulip trees can have widespread root systems that go as deep as three feet, and though your tulip tree is small now, eventually, it may grow as high as 120 feet tall with a root system three times that size" (https://treejourney.com/full-tulip-tree-timeline-how-long-they-take-to-grow/), or about ~90 trees per acre.
Karmudjun
I have always liked our Tulip Poplar trees, Thanks Michael!
Jennifer Page
We need more carbon dioxide not less. C02 is at a historic low. If it drops a few ppm we will be back in another Ice Age. Check the data for yourselves but choose your search engine
jzj
@ Dave Holland: Good math on your part. The reference to 48 pounds CO2/tree is widely cited (I'll return to that in a moment), but it turns out that the 'trees per acre' figures on the internet are all over the place, from 100 to 435. But none of this really matters if the idea is that these Tulip trees are unusually fast growers, because they would need their own calculations and not some generalized figure. The Poplar tree is considered one of the most fast-growing, and it is alleged to capture 11 tons of CO2/hectare = 8800 pounds/acre (https://propopulus.eu/en/poplar-and-the-economy-of-the-future/#:~:text=Compared%20to%20other%20trees%20like,11%20tons%20of%20CO2). Based on this, the idea of 23,000 pounds/acre is far-fetched. A useful article would have focused on comparing fast-growing trees, and moreover, fast-growing trees for construction use. In which case, skip the trees and go for bamboo: 160,000 pounds per acre per year (http://www.growmorebiotech.com/carbon-farming-by-bamboo.html#:~:text=Bamboo%2C%20under%20ideal%20condition%2C%20one,dioxide%20per%20acre%2Fyear).
Grunchy
Growing trees is pointless at absorbing carbon dioxide unless you can bury them deep underground and lock that carbon away again.
This only happened once before, during a 60-million year span known as the Carboniferous era, during which trees had no natural decay mechanism and entire forests could grow and die and be buried by geological forces before they could even rot (and that's how they turned into coal).
Today, all wood rots soon after the tree dies and pretty much just evaporates as CO2 back into the atmosphere.
There's only one carbon-based substance that persists in the environment, same as wood did back 360 to 300 million years ago, and that's plastic.
That's right, if we play our cards right we can harvest trees for woody material, and use that to make non-biodegradable plastic. Use that to make useful goods and then, when they're worn out, bury all that carbon in landfills.
Trees biodegrade back into CO2. Growing more trees does nothing to change atmospheric CO2. People need to grasp how this works.
DaveWesely
Trees absorb CO2 and store the carbon in solid form as cellulose, which is great. But if you harvest the trees and BURN them, the carbon is returned to the atmosphere. Yet we see bio-fuel and wood being burned as an ecologically friendly solution, when it is not. The solution is to put the wood and wood products into landfills after they have been reasonably recycled. That sequesters the carbon.