Earth's inner core may have stopped spinning – but what does that mean?

Earth's inner core may have stopped spinning – but what does that mean?
An artist's impression of the core
An artist's impression of the inner structure of the Earth
View 1 Image
An artist's impression of the core
An artist's impression of the inner structure of the Earth

The inner Earth is a mysterious place, and now scientists may have uncovered a strange new secret. According to a new study, the Earth’s inner core may have recently stopped rotating, relative to the surface, as part of a decades-long cycle.

With thousands of miles of rock in the way, it’s hard to get a good look at exactly what’s going on in the center of the Earth. Scientists have to study it indirectly by measuring magnetic field changes, ancient crystals, or how seismic waves from earthquakes propagate through different layers. This has helped geologists learn new details, including that the core could be made of a superionic iron alloy.

Now a new study has reached a surprising conclusion – that relative to Earth’s surface, the inner core stopped spinning around 2009. This could be possible because the inner core is a more or less solid ball of iron floating in a liquid outer core, so its rotation is not necessarily tied to that of the rest of the planet.

The researchers, from Peking University, analyzed the seismic waves from earthquakes passing through the inner core since the 1960s, investigating the differences in how those waves looked and how long it took them to propagate. Intriguingly, they found that for decades the travel times of these waves would vary in specific ways – but after about 2009, that variation all but vanished. Travel times have remained steady, which the team says is an indication that the core’s rotation has “paused.”

That doesn’t mean that it’s not spinning at all – it means that the core’s rotation is now essentially in lockstep with the rotation at the surface. At different times the core can race around or lag behind the surface, but even then the difference is tiny. It can, however, add up over time, so that the core is drifting by dozens of kilometers per year.

The team goes a step further and says that the study could indicate that the core may now be rotating in the opposite direction. But again, that doesn't quite mean what it sounds like – instead, the core’s slowing rotation makes it appear to be drifting backwards relative to the surface.

This is all part of a 70-year cycle, according to the researchers. They claim to have found evidence that the previous reversal took place in the early 1970s, and it may even coincide with other observed changes in Earth cycles, such as the magnetic field and the length of the day.

The cause of this cycle could be several major competing forces. The magnetic field generated by the outer core could be speeding up the inner core’s spin, while the huge gravitational influence of the mantle could drag on it and slow its spin.

Of course, in the murky world of inner Earth geology, nothing is set in stone (pun intended), and other scientists disagree with the findings of the new study.

“These mathematical models are most likely all incorrect because they explain the observed data but are not required by the data,” Hrvoje Tkalcic, a geophysicist at the Australian National University, told AFP. “Therefore, the geophysical community will be divided about this finding and the topic will remain controversial.”

The new study was published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Source: Nature

Makes sense.
What are the implications of the induced motion on the core (and therefore the Earth) due to conservation of angular velocity effects of that?
David Wilson
I wonder if this behaviour in the core causes the Earth to wobble or the axis to shift, that is something I have wondered about over many years.
Robert Stiles
Some scientists and Suspicious 0bservers are saying we are due for a polar reversal this century. I tend to agree with them and Doug Vogt.
As Robert Stiles indicated; this could be correlated to the magnetic pole shift that is currently accelerating.

If a pole reversal happens, magnetic strength goes to very low (4%), and life on our planet changes substantially.
I think it is impossible for the core to be solid as iron melts around 2200F and the core temp is much hotter. What effect does the direction have on the magnetic poles?
Steve Jones
@akarp +1
My question was also about the magnetic field. I thought I read somewhere that the next magnetic pole swap was more-or-less due.
This sounds like a warning sign.
Even if we can shield ourselves from the increase in the Sun's radiation, I wonder if we can shield our beloved technology.
just friggin' imagine if the Dzhanibekov effect actually does applies to the earth itself as well!
@Steve Jones:
Yes, I read the poles flip on average every 12k years...and the last one happened 42k years ago. I think NASA has said some of the South Pole GPS Satellites have already temporarily lost location due to the shift in the magnetic poles...

I was thinking the same thing!