Space

Our galaxy's black hole spins so fast it warps spacetime into a football

An illustration shows how the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy is squashing spacetime into a football shape
NASA/CXC/M. Weiss
An illustration shows how the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy is squashing spacetime into a football shape
NASA/CXC/M. Weiss

A supermassive monster lurks at the center of our galaxy, and astronomers have now discovered that it’s spinning so fast it’s warping the very fabric of spacetime into a football shape.

According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, mass bends spacetime, a four-dimensional “fabric” that pervades the universe, and the effect is what we experience as gravity. It happens with any amount of mass – you yourself are bending spacetime right now – but it’s barely noticeable until you’re dealing with extremely massive objects, like black holes or entire galaxies.

When that happens, you get some bizarre results. Galaxies can act as lenses that magnify bright objects behind them, letting us see much farther out into the cosmos than usual. Collisions between black holes and neutron stars send ripples throughout the universe. An extremely dense star system has been seen dragging and twisting spacetime. And now, astronomers have found that the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way is doing some weird things to spacetime too.

Known as Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), this black hole has the mass of about 4 million Suns, meaning it has plenty of heft to throw around on the spacetime continuum. And new research reveals that Sgr A* is spinning so fast that when viewed from side-on, it would squash spacetime around it into the shape of a football.

Astronomers used X-ray data from Chandra and radio data from the Very Large Array (VLA) to calculate how fast Sgr A* is spinning, based on how material is flowing around it. Their study found that the black hole has an angular velocity of about 60% of the maximum possible, and an angular momentum of about 90% the maximum possible.

Of course, you can’t just go around warping reality itself without consequences. The fast spin of Sgr A* throws off a huge amount of energy, which can drive outflows of matter around the black hole. Gigantic X-ray “chimneys” above and below the plane of our galaxy are evidence that Sgr A* was much more active in the past, and it could get rowdy again in the future.

“Although it's quiet right now, our work shows that in the future it will give an incredibly powerful kick to surrounding matter,” said Anan Lu, co-author of the study. “That might happen in a thousand or a million years, or it could happen in our lifetimes.”

The research was published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society in January (and we’re sure it’s no coincidence that the news of a football-shaped spacetime warp was held off until Superbowl weekend).

Source: Chandra

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
4 comments
rgbatduke
OK, I'm a physicist. I know what speed, velocity, momentum and angular momentum all are. I have taught graduate electrodynamics and quantum mechanics etc, for many years. I have literally no idea what this sentence means: "Their study found that the black hole has an angular velocity of about 60% the speed of light, and an angular momentum of about 90% the speed of light." First, angular velocity is measured in radians per second (units of inverse time). Speed (of light) has units of length over time. Comparing the two with percentages is, quite literally, impossible. Consider the humble rotating rigid disk. It has a single angular speed, but the speed of the chunks of mass that make up the disk scales with r, the distance from the center of rotation, TIMES the angular speed (a second minor sin is committed relating speed (a scalar) to velocity (a vector) but never mind). Second, it compares angular MOMENTUM to the speed of light. Say what? Angular momentum has the units of ML^2/T (mass times length squared over time). The speed of light has units of L/T. Angular momentum is ALSO a vector. And then things get really complicated, because CLASSICAL light doesn't have a "value" for its angular momentum, while QUANTUM light -- photons -- have a spin of 1 (consistent with a vector field). However, one cannot have 90% of a quantized field, so clearly they aren't referring to quantum angular momentum. What are they referring to, and how can it possibly be compared to light? I have no doubt that the spinning black hole has a lot of angular momentum, just like a spinning planet, star, neutron star, etc -- but nobody compares that angular momentum to the speed of light because it is an absurdity -- it scales with the rotating mass, its physical size, and its angular speed(s) of rotation (speeds as it need not be rigid -- the galaxy itself is rotating at differential speeds).

Puzzled.
philippeholthuizen
@rgbatduke I love reading an informed reply to a New Atlas article, thanks!

Did you read the linked article? It has a very different description:
‘ They found Sgr A* is spinning with an angular velocity — the number of revolutions per second — that is about 60% of the maximum possible value, a limit set by material not being able to travel faster than the speed of light.’

Seems to make more sense!

No mention of the 90% value and description, so I’ curious where Michael Irving found that number.
Expanded Viewpoint
And you are a REAL physicist, not just a theoretical one! Yes, I too was a bit perplexed when I read that and it gave me pause. It read like some of the word salad that comes out of a politician's mouth! Maybe someone's brain was warped from making too many Alderon runs in only 43 parsecs!! I'm very thirsty, someone please pour me a big glass of prop wash! To make sure that I don't forget to buy fifty pounds of torque each week, I tie a piece of stream line around my finger.
Ric
Thanks to all the commenters. I did guess that maybe the 60% figure might have referenced the speed (or velocity ;) of the perimeter of the object though I had trouble figuring how that perimeter would be determined. And as for the 90%, yeah I really had no idea how to process that.
I am NOT a physicist but am increasingly coming across bits of information like this in the press, most recently in the New York Times. My comment regarding its inaccuracy was met with the counter argument that it came directly from a planetarium’s website - and indeed there it was: the sparsest galaxy ever observed illustrated with a striped rainbow laid onto it, (center of galaxy green) supposedly representing the result of red and blue shifted light caused by its speedy rotation.
Not being a physicist I must always acknowledge the distinct possibility that these things that make no sense to me constitute my own deficit of knowledge or understanding, an increasing possibility as the brain ages and science progresses.