Space

NASA coaxes Voyager 1's thrusters back to life

Model of Voyager 1
NASA/Caltech JPL
Model of Voyager 1
NASA/Caltech JPL

After almost five decades sailing through space, NASA is trying to squeeze a few more years out of the venerable Voyager 1 deep space probe by swapping a wonky thruster system for a disused secondary one to ensure the craft can keep its radio antenna pointing at the Earth.

One of the two oldest active powered spacecraft still in existence, Voyager 1 is an incredible piece of engineering – especially when you consider that it was designed when the microchip was still a breakthrough technology and it was only supposed to operate for four years. Instead, for 47 years it has continued to function as it flies on its one-way trajectory out of our solar system.

Now some 15.2 billion miles (24.5 billion km) from Earth, Voyager 1 is the farthest-traveled human-made object ever launched into space. It's so distant that a radio signal takes 22.5 hours to reach it, which makes for very long pauses in conversations.

One of the reasons for Voyager's longevity is how NASA engineers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California have worked to nurse its failing systems along. This is pretty impressive when you consider that the original engineers are all dead or retired and the operating manuals are yellow with age.

The most recent problem with Voyager 1 is with one of the three thruster systems aboard. The one currently being used is the trajectory correction maneuver thruster system, which is fueled by liquid hydrazine that passes over an iridium-coated aluminum oxide catalyst and spontaneously decomposes into nitrogen and hydrogen. This results in tens-of-milliseconds-long puffs of gas at a rate of about 40 per day to keep the probe's main radio antenna pointed at Earth so it can send and receive signals.

The problem is that this system is suffering from clogging in some of the fuel lines. This is due to a rubber diaphragm in the fuel tank that's deteriorating with age, depositing silicon dioxide in the tubing. This is narrowing the tube diameter and interrupting the proper flow.

To deal with this, the engineers decided to bring another thruster system back online to take over the job. Ironically, the trajectory correction maneuver thruster system was given the job in 2018 when the attitude propulsion thrusters were clogging. Now NASA has switched back.

According to the space agency, this swap isn't a matter of just flipping a switch. In recent years, many heaters and pieces of equipment have been shut down to conserve the power from Voyager's failing nuclear generator.

The disused thrusters are now too cold to be treated lightly and would be damaged from simply turning them on. Worse, there isn't rough power left aboard to turn on a heater for the attitude thrusters without endangering the entire spacecraft.

The answer was familiar to anyone who's tried to coax an ancient car to life in the middle of winter. Do something daft. In this case, the engineers switched off one of Voyager's main heaters for an hour to free up power for the thruster heaters. On August 27, Mission Control confirmed that the gamble had paid off and the thrusters were back online after six years.

"All the decisions we will have to make going forward are going to require a lot more analysis and caution than they once did," said Suzanne Dodd, Voyager’s project manager at JPL.

Source: NASA

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
6 comments
mlynch002
Now if BOEING could only do the same for the STARLINER thrusters. I know, STARLINER is back from space, but the irony is thick. A spacecraft billions of miles away and built some 50 years ago can be made to work? But NASA and BOEING cannot get one built almost yesterday and with the so called "latest technology" to work safely in low earth orbit? The more we pay, the less we get. So much for "progress". Hurrah for VOYAGER1 and JPL!
Techutante
I agree in theory, but the thrusters on this space antique barely have to push as there's zero gravity or air resistance out there. The Starliner's thrusters all worked fine, I think it was
the everything else that was busted.
WillNC
Forty-seven years ago, a spacecraft was launched, designed by engineers wielding slide rules and ingenuity, making educated guesses and adding a touch of 'magic sauce' to the mix, followed by relentless testing to perfect it. Consider the technicians who ran wires, bound them with wax-coated nylon, soldered connections, and assembled the components, likely never imagining it would outlast many, still operational after decades in space. Approaching 75, I've been fascinated by the space program since my youth. It's remarkable what was achieved back then, feats not replicated in our high-tech era. This isn't to say there haven't been wonders, but it seems we've lost something vital along the way. Credit is also due to the JPL engineers who have mastered these outdated systems and lovingly maintain these two spacecraft as they venture where no earthly machine has gone before, at least as far as we know.
anthony88
Be nice if they could get it to turn back towards Earth and get picked up in orbit some time around 2080.
Davidj2
anthony88 - I think that was the genesis of the first Star Trek movie ( but then Hollywood embellished it.) :o)
c2cam
@WillNC - well put!