Aging Well

This dietary mineral can protect aging brains from cognitive decline

This dietary mineral can protect aging brains from cognitive decline
Essential mineral: New insights into how much copper is needed to benefit the brain
Essential mineral: New insights into how much copper is needed to benefit the brain
View 1 Image
Essential mineral: New insights into how much copper is needed to benefit the brain
1/1
Essential mineral: New insights into how much copper is needed to benefit the brain

A new study has found that a specific amount of trace element copper is linked to protecting cognitive function in older adults, providing novel insight into how the mineral impacts the brain.

Researchers from the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University in China investigated whether everyday dietary copper intake plays a role in maintaining cognitive health in older adults – and, if so, whether there’s a "Goldilocks zone" that can best benefit aging brains.

The scientists also wanted to explore whether people with a history of stroke – who have a higher risk of cognitive impairment –might be helped or harmed by copper intake.

The team used the data of 2,354 adults aged 60 years or over, taken from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which included health interviews and physical and dietary exams, conducted between 2011 and 2014. Participants completed three standard cognitive exams: the Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), which gauges speed, sustained attention, and working memory; the Animal Fluency Test (AFT), measuring verbal fluency and executive function; and the global cognition z-score, which is more of an overall assessment based on the other tests.

The health data also included self-reported dietary intake, allowing for the researchers to assess copper intake.

What they found was that 1.22 mg of copper per day was associated with a significant brain boost, preserving cognitive function and protecting against neurological disease. Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration advice is for a daily copper intake of 0.9 mg. Participants with moderate copper intake (1.2–1.6 mg/day) performed significantly better on all three tests, while intake above or below this bracket had poorer cognitive outcomes.

Among those with a history of stroke, participants in the highest copper intake group showed the largest cognitive advantage. The stroke subgroup had the strongest association between copper intake and improved cognition. The researchers believe this suggests that the mineral has neuroprotective or neurorecovery potential in stroke recovery.

While scientists have previously detailed that this essential trace mineral is involved in brain function, just how much copper is beneficial isn't well understood. What we do know is that copper aids neurotransmitter synthesis, mitochondrial energy metabolism and synaptic signaling, among other roles. However, excess copper has been linked to neurodegenerative processes and neurotoxicity. In 2013 evidence emerged that copper may in fact contribute to the development of Alzheimer's disease.

"Copper, an essential trace element, is known to be a vital component for various physiological functions, including the proper development and functioning of the nervous system," noted the researchers. "It is a key cofactor for several enzymes involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, cellular energy production, and antioxidant defenses. However, the relationship between copper and cognitive function is complex and not yet fully understood."

While the observational study doesn't establish causation, it's the first of its kind to define a "sweet spot" of copper intake that steers clear of deficiency and overdoing it – both of which can deliver poor health outcomes. And it shines a light on how, as we age, some nutrients may be more important for brain health than we give them credit for.

"The current study indicates a potential association between dietary copper intake and enhanced cognitive function in American older adults, particularly among those with a history of stroke," the researchers conclude. "Dose-response analysis suggested an optimal copper intake level, with an inflection point of approximately1.22 mg per day. However, further longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm these findings."

It's also worth noting that the researchers don't recommend copper supplements, given that it's readily available in many foods and the recommended daily intake is just over a gram. While copper levels vary, foods high in this trace mineral include nuts and seeds, legumes, leafy greens, liver and oysters (among other shellfish).

While the researchers accounted for confounding factors like age, sex, alcohol intake and heart disease, it's worth noting that the dietary intake was self-reported, so further studies are needed to confirm copper's brain-health benefits and to better understand the mechanisms at play.

The research was published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Source: Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University via Nature

2 comments
2 comments
Arandor
Yet one of the key recommendations for those with a genetic risk of developing Alzheimer's is to avoid copper. They specifically recommend avoiding supplements that contain copper. Those with high cholesterol levels appear particularly at risk.
Researchers found that copper may make amyloid plaques more toxic, “leading to increased oxidative stress.” “Free Cu [copper] is extremely efficient in the generation of free radicals,” and when copper is removed with a chelating (metal-binding) drug, the free radical oxidation drops. A systematic review of the literature suggests that a diet rich in copper and iron might aggravate the detrimental effects of a high intake of cholesterol and [saturated fat] on the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.
paul314
The problem will be hitting that "sweet spot" without sophisticated ongoing testing. Because overdoses of copper can have serious cognitive and other effects. In addition, the use of the word "significant" is always a problem in reports like this, because an effect can be statistically significant -- recognizable as not happening by chance -- without being clinically significant. Do the differences found in tests make a difference in day-to-day functioning?