Architecture

Low-cost additive turns concrete slabs into super-fast energy storage

Low-cost additive turns concrete slabs into super-fast energy storage
Cement and water, with a small amount of carbon black mixed in, self-assembles into fractal branches of conductive electrodes, turning concrete into an energy-storing supercapacitor
Cement and water, with a small amount of carbon black mixed in, self-assembles into fractal branches of conductive electrodes, turning concrete into an energy-storing supercapacitor
View 2 Images
Cement and water, with a small amount of carbon black mixed in, self-assembles into fractal branches of conductive electrodes, turning concrete into an energy-storing supercapacitor
1/2
Cement and water, with a small amount of carbon black mixed in, self-assembles into fractal branches of conductive electrodes, turning concrete into an energy-storing supercapacitor
In small-scale lab tests, the MIT team cut out pairs of electrode discs and used these supercapacitors to power a 3-volt light-emitting diode (LED)
2/2
In small-scale lab tests, the MIT team cut out pairs of electrode discs and used these supercapacitors to power a 3-volt light-emitting diode (LED)

MIT researchers have discovered that when you mix cement and carbon black with water, the resulting concrete self-assembles into an energy-storing supercapacitor that can put out enough juice to power a home or fast-charge electric cars.

We've written before about the idea of using concrete for energy storage – back in 2021, a team from the Chalmers University of Technology showed how useful amounts of electrical energy could be stored in concrete poured around carbon fiber mesh electrodes, with mixed-in carbon fibers to add conductivity.

MIT's discovery appears to take things to the next level, since it does away with the need to lay mesh electrodes into the concrete, and instead allows the carbon black to form its own connected electrode structures as part of the curing process.

This process takes advantage of the way that water and cement react together; the water forms a branching network of channels in the concrete as it starts to harden, and the carbon black naturally migrates into those channels. These channels exhibit a fractal-like structure, larger branches splitting off into smaller and smaller ones – and that creates carbon electrodes with an extremely large surface area, running throughout the concrete.

Two of these branches, separated by an insulating layer or a thin space, work happily as the plates of a supercapacitor once the whole thing's been bathed in a standard electrolyte, like potassium chloride.

Supercapacitors, of course, can charge up and discharge almost immediately, so power density and output is generally much higher than you'd get with a standard lithium battery.

Energy density is lower, and there's a tradeoff to be made between how much energy is stored volumetrically and how strong you need your concrete to be, since adding more carbon black both boosts energy storage and weakens the final concrete.

But the great thing here is that this energy storage device doesn't need to be small; concrete tends to get used in bulk. An average American 2,000-sq-ft (185.8-m2) home built on a reasonably standard five-inch-thick (13-cm) concrete slab uses about 31 cubic yards (~24 m3) of concrete. Add more if you've got a driveway or a concreted garage, and significantly more again if the house is built using concrete walls or columns.

The MIT team says a 1,589-cu-ft (45 m3) block of nanocarbon black-doped concrete will store around 10 kWh of electricity – enough to cover around a third of the power consumption of the average American home, or to reduce your grid energy bill close to zero in conjunction with a decent-sized solar rooftop array. What's more, it would add little to no cost.

The team has tested these concrete supercaps at small scale, cutting out pairs of electrodes to create tiny 1-volt supercapacitors about the size of button-cell batteries, and using three of them to light up a 3-volt LED. Now, it's working on blocks the size of car batteries, and targeting a 1,589-cu-ft, 10-kWh version for a larger-scale demonstration.

In small-scale lab tests, the MIT team cut out pairs of electrode discs and used these supercapacitors to power a 3-volt light-emitting diode (LED)
In small-scale lab tests, the MIT team cut out pairs of electrode discs and used these supercapacitors to power a 3-volt light-emitting diode (LED)

It's a super-scalable technology, according to MIT Professor Franz-Josef Ulm, co-author on a new study published yesterday in the journal PNAS.

“You can go from 1-millimeter-thick electrodes to 1-meter-thick electrodes, and by doing so basically you can scale the energy storage capacity from lighting an LED for a few seconds, to powering a whole house," says Ulm in a press release.

Looking beyond the home, concrete is absolutely everywhere, from buildings to ground coverings to the road network. The team says this energy-storing concrete could be paired with roadside solar panels and inductive charging coils to create super-quick, drive-through wireless EV charging roads thanks to the supercapacitors' ability to pump bulk juice on demand.

There's also presumably a lot of concrete used in the foundations of large grid-based energy storage facilities, which raises the interesting possibility that a giant concrete supercapacitor might pair well with a slower-moving chemical battery, giving it the ability to deliver jolts of power to the grid quickly as well as longer-duration contributions at lower power.

On the other hand, it's unclear whether this kind of concrete would be suitable for outdoor use where it'll get wet. It's also unclear whether these concrete supercapacitors can practically be poured on-site to self-assemble in situ. Or indeed whether each electrode pair needs to be sealed, or indeed exactly where and how you'd wire these blocks of concrete up to power your house, or indeed whether concrete supercapacitors like this would be safe to touch.

Certainly a fascinating project, though, and we'll be interested to learn how it progresses.

The research is open-access in the journal PNAS.

Source: MIT News

15 comments
15 comments
Chris Shattock
Unfortunately, you omit a crucial point: "Specifically, we find that high-rate capability is achieved with high W/C-ratio electrodes to the detriment of the cohesive strength of the materials, here determined by hardness measurements (Fig. 2F). This comes as no surprise: the increase in hydration porosity leads to stress concentrations around micrometer-sized pores, and hence to a lower strength performance for high W/C materials (22, 46). There exists thus a trade-off between energy storage properties and strength properties, specifically for structural electrode applications."
Chris Shattock
Moreover, given the foregoing, this may preclude the use of superplasticisers.
pete-y
I shudder at the safety implications of large charged blocks of concrete which have random electrodes coming out where they see fit.
Maybe it would need to be sealed in a large insulating high strength concrete sleeve. But the re-rods may get exciting!
reader
Cool. The capacitor would be better with graphene and produce double strength concrete. To make the graphene, put graphite in a blender for a ~45 minutes with water and whey (or urea/glycerol etc), then throw in the cement mixer.
TechGazer
I'm confused about how this works. Capacitance is determined by the area and spacing of the plates. If you have one block of concrete with a vast volume of nanofibres separated from another block, it's only the ends along each surface that store much charge. I don't see how they can grow two _separate but closely interwoven_ branches of nanofibres in one block. Do they apply power until all the short-circuits burn out? Hard to get that reliably near 50% plate volume, and since concrete changes over time, there would likely be frequent new short circuits.

On first glance, this appears like one of those "See our nifty experimental apparatus lighting an LED! Imagine this large scale! Fund us!" ... but the demonstrated results never gets replicated by anyone else. Cold fusion had some impressive experiment photos too.
jerryd
45m3 is about 200 tons of cement at $100/ton plus carbon, etc to store 10kwh, is just costly, silly.
Next the blocks have to be insulated from each other making them not suitable for structure and no way to scale up.
You are far better off storing heat, coolth in them with a heat pump for 1MWh of storage or much more depending on temps used at a fraction of the cost.
AbsolutJohn
I was likewise interested in the many potential possibilities until seeing the size of the concrete they wanted to use in their test… and the charge it was expected to hold. Must be a typo. ???? That’s just WAY too much concrete for such a small amount of capacitance. I know you gotta start somewhere… but wow. Maybe increase proportional capacity before pouring 45m3 of concrete. DoubleYoy.
rgbatduke
To amplify Jerry's point -- 45 cubic meters is a block 3 meters by 3 meters by five meters. Say ten feet by ten feet by 16 feet. Solid-ish concrete. To quote an oft used aphorism: "Not in my back yard".

Oh, yeah, and then there is the cost which is absurd, the difficulty of tapping into those "self-assembling" microstructures, the ease with which they'll short out when, I dunno, they get wet, or damp, or shift with time, or arc over at random times. And if you DID build one with 10 kWh in it, heaven help anyone that walks on it or shorts it out -- the whole thing would have to be packaged as carefully as ANY super-high-power supercapacitor is.

Those of us who are elderly nerds who ignored warning labels and took apart old TVs well remember the "Do not open this box unless you are trained service person or you will die" warnings. They were there because TVs contained a very few "large" capacitors that maintained operating voltages of kV to help filter and stabilize the electron gun in the tube and equally large capacitors elsewhere as filters. Those caps would remain charged for a rather long time even after the set was turned off and unplugged, and contained more than enough energy at high enough voltages to stop your heart if you shorted them out with your body. Imagine the joy of shorting out 10 kW at almost any operating voltage!

Gotta say -- so far, this is simply absurd.
Opa Geek
Take this one step further. Oak Ridge came up with a process that makes capacitor or battery carbon out old tires. Since I worked on this process I know it works. Actually, made working lithium batteries out of this material. Carbon costs are also very low since the raw material is only $.50 a lb and the only precursor necessary to turn the rubber into carbon is Sulfuric acid. Imagine highways made of this material.
SussexWolf
People criticising the concept practicality should think a little more creatively how such a material could be used. For example, such a material could be packaged into blocks, used structurally with an appropriate external waterproof covering, or poured into flooring above an insulating and waterproof layer, etc. The point is to use it where concrete or similar would already be used, so not adding to the bulk. As to the cost, it needs to be compared to the cost of pouring regular concrete plus the cost of an equivalent power storage system.
Load More