Automotive

Porsche's 6-stroke engine doubles up on power and compression

Porsche's 6-stroke engine doubles up on power and compression
The legendary Porsche 911 GTS flat 6 powerplant – a spectacular example of the modern four-stroke
The legendary Porsche 911 GTS flat 6 powerplant – a spectacular example of the modern four-stroke
View 2 Images
The legendary Porsche 911 GTS flat 6 powerplant – a spectacular example of the modern four-stroke
1/2
The legendary Porsche 911 GTS flat 6 powerplant – a spectacular example of the modern four-stroke
Porsche's 6-stroke engine design patent figures from Porsche's patent application
2/2
Porsche's 6-stroke engine design patent figures from Porsche's patent application

Intake, compression, power, then exhaust. Every 4-stroke engine ever made – about 80% of all engines currently in existence – function on this principle – even rotary engines. But now, Porsche has filed a patent to make a 6-stroke engine.

The bottom line here is the introduction of two more strokes: Intake, compression, power, then compression, power, exhaust. Two power strokes and two compression strokes per cycle.

Generally, the biggest difference between a typical 4-stroke engine and the 6-stroke design is in the cam and valve timing. Porsche's design is vastly different than anything we've seen since Samuel Griffin's very first 6-stroke engine design in 1883.

Porsche's patent shows the crankshaft spinning within a ring on planetary gears, meaning as the crankshaft rotates, the pistons have two entirely different top-dead-center positions as well as two different bottom-dead-center positions. This also creates variable compression within the engine.

Porsche's 6-stroke engine design patent figures from Porsche's patent application
Porsche's 6-stroke engine design patent figures from Porsche's patent application

After reading through dozens of pages of the patent, which is mostly legalese, "method for combustion machine with two times three strokes" is how the system is titled. Adding an extra combustion and power stroke to each revolution of the crankshaft means more horsepower to the wheels – and could also mean a more efficient internal combustion engine.

Or – as can often be the case with patents – it could mean absolutely nothing other than Porsche simply doesn't want anyone else to have or develop this technology.

There's nothing in the patent describing how engineers deal with vibrations, harmonic balance, RPM ranges, or any of the juicier issues the idea might spark for those among us with a bit more black under our fingernails.

But it's worth noting that this isn't the first time a 6-stroke engine has been announced or designed. Previous iterations worked very much like a standard 4-stroke engine with intake, compression, combustion, exhaust first.

Ten years ago, Bruce Crower had the very first working 6-stroke diesel engine in the world. Crower's 6-stroke design added water injection as a 5th stroke, and the 6th being the steam flash exhausted from the motor. Check it out:

6-Stroke Engine Demo

Another design, the Beare Head 6-stroke, replaces traditional valves with a second piston that functions as a valve while scavenging exhaust gases. It's debatable whether it's a true 6-stroke, or simply a 4-stroke with an alternate form of valving.

Here's yet another – a design that's very much like the Crower engine, but that uses the middle two strokes for water injection and steam expansion.

Water-Powered ICE Is Here!!! | The Revolutionary 6-Stroke Engine

Overall, it appears as though 6-stroke engines end up being far more complex, but they could have the benefits of increased thermal efficiency (45-50% – far higher than that of a typical 4-stroke engine which make 30%, at the best) and reduced emissions. Similar to the benefits that enabled 4-strokes to overtake the ubiquitous 2-stroke across most of the world.

Of course, in a world rapidly shifting towards electric vehicles, a betting man might wager this new 6-stroke design goes nowhere.

Source: Porsche via Motor 1

13 comments
13 comments
Chase
I don't know about the Porsche version, but I think the water-injection versions might be a really good place to use Koenigsegg's Freevalve tech, if they can ever make it reliable and cheap enough for mass production. Delete the complicated camshaft entirely and the motor would be able to switch back and forth between four-stroke and water injection six-stroke in milliseconds. Even if not being used for fuel economy purposes, it could be a handy feature. Pushing a lot of boost and the knock sensor starts tripping, switch to six-stroke for a split second or start adding in a six-stroke cycle every several revolutions to cool down the cylinders and prevent a rapid unscheduled disassembly.
wf
To dismiss this based mostly on the "coming" of electric vehicles... is idiocy. You cannot ignore the substantial efficiency gains cited in this article over a 4 stroke engine. Let's get real as to electricity....those companies putting "All your eggs in one basket" will have a rude awakening. Consider what one mathematician wrote, in answer to some govts wanting to ban IC engines by 2035. He said (correctly)-->-" In the US, we drive 3.2 trillion miles per year. Electric cars use approx 0.3KWH/mile.. We'll need to build a 1 GW nuclear power plant EVERY 3 WEEKS....starting NOW.....just for the EXTRA electricity needed.". I essence, lawmakers around the world have no clue and no business forcing technology beyond its sustainability limits, and car companies putting all their weight behind this will fail. Going after a 6 -stroke IC engine design should at least be part of the future-thinking package.
Steve Barry
EVs will be nothing but a bad memory in the next few years. More innovation in ICE engines is the future.
veryken
I've been dismissing ICE developments in recent years as the entire industry seems to be heading into obsolescence, only clinging to "higher efficiency with this" as something to prolong their demise. This thingimagit by Porsche does not change my mind. Used to love Porsche. But no, not ICE.
JS
@wf - My carbon footprint the last 20 years spent in motorsports ... well ... it's likely a whole heckuva lot bigger than most people, let just say that. I've smoked no less than several hundred sets of tires alone into the enviroment, not to mention the sheer amount of gasoline I've burned. I love motors as much as the next dude that loves motors a whole heap. :) I'm only writing things the way I see and interpret!

Also, I grew up on 2-T. Still prefer em. Appreciate you takin the time to give me your 2 cents though. Thank you.
Spud Murphy
Amazing that people, including commenters here, are still clinging to ICE. They denigrate EVs, but have obviously never driven one. Once you do, you don't go back, ICE is like driving a tractor in comparison. Aside from EVs just being a heap nicer to drive and own, the fact is we have to stop burning stuff, all stuff, and we needed to do it a decade ago. If we don't get off the fossil fuel addiction in the next decade or so, we are screwed. Anyone who has kids or grandkids and still promotes ICE vehicles is basically condemning their descendants to a really horrible future. Unfortunately, the average person, especially the average American, is woefully ignorant of climate science, it is just way beyond them, so they simply go into denial mode.
Eschew Obfuscation
China is adding more than 10 GW of renewable energy generation every 14 days, so 15 times what is necessary to power all the extra EVs we need. Too bad all this engineering talent is not working on better battery technology. This is the only thing holding back explosive EV adoption.
sleekmarlin
A small increase in battery efficiency or a reduction in battery cost, and ICE won't be financially economical anymore. In fact, I think we have already reached that. Money drives everything. I'm surprised Porsche is still investing in ICE development. Maybe niche applications for ICE will remain into the medium term.
christopher
Amazing how so many people are completely unaware that the vast majority of Electric cars are coal-powered.
If your baseload electricity comes from coal (like 99% of Australia) and your local coal powerstation has never enjoyed a period of excess renewable inputs (like 99.99% of Australia) then your electric car is coal powered, and you're spewing more Co2 per KM into the air than a comparable ICE vehicle does.

6 stroke seems ridiculous; it's the exhaust that's hot, so adding water and using the expansion to drive a turbine makes sense, recompressing it doesn't...
Spud Murphy
Christopher, you are just parroting right-wing sky news/murdoch press rubbish. Check out the NEM-Watch website or openelectricity dot org dot and you will see Australia is averaging close to 40% renewables. In some states, like SA and TAS, it's almost completely renewables. But, figures show that even on a 100% coal fired grid, EVs are still cleaner than ICE. Your knowledge seems to be about 20 years behind the times.
Load More