Biology

Hunter-gatherers were violently wiped off the map by farmers, DNA reveals

Hunter-gatherers were violently wiped off the map by farmers, DNA reveals
The Porsmose man from the Neolithic period, killed by two arrows with bone tips. New evidence suggests it was not such a peaceful transition of power from the hunter-gatherers to the first farmers.
The Porsmose man from the Neolithic period, killed by two arrows with bone tips. New evidence suggests it was not such a peaceful transition of power from the hunter-gatherers to the first farmers.
View 1 Image
The Porsmose man from the Neolithic period, killed by two arrows with bone tips. New evidence suggests it was not such a peaceful transition of power from the hunter-gatherers to the first farmers.
1/1
The Porsmose man from the Neolithic period, killed by two arrows with bone tips. New evidence suggests it was not such a peaceful transition of power from the hunter-gatherers to the first farmers.

Contrary to what has long been believed, there was no peaceful transition of power from hunter-gather societies to farming communities in Europe, with new advanced DNA analysis revealing that the newcomers slaughtered the existing population, completely wiping them out within a few generations.

Researchers from Sweden's Lund University analyzed skeletons and teeth found in what is now Denmark, and found that 5,900 years ago, the region underwent a swift and total population change. Prior to this, Danish Mesolithic people of the Maglemose, Kongemose and Ertebølle cultures – genetically related to other Western European hunter-gatherers – were prominent inhabitants. But when Neolithic farmers arrived, an abrupt shift can be seen in DNA records, with next to no genetic contribution from the local hunter-gatherers.

Tracing the DNA timeline, the researchers could see that the hunter-gatherers had been swiftly wiped out by the late Stone Age, in what they suspect was a very bloody and very thorough takeover.

“This transition has previously been presented as peaceful," said Anne Birgitte Nielsen, geology researcher and head of the Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory at Lund University. "However, our study indicates the opposite. In addition to violent death, it is likely that new pathogens from livestock finished off many gatherers."

However, it seems what goes around comes around. Some 1,000 years later, around 4,850 years ago, these farming communities suffered a similar fate, with the arrival of a 'big-boned' semi-nomadic group with origins tied to the livestock-herding Yamnaya of southern Russia. Again, DNA evidence suggests violent battles and the introduction of new pathogens caused another swift genetic shakeup.

The newest arrivals, who tamed animals, kept cattle and traversed the land via horse and cart, would prevail in the region; after this tumultuous period, the area was settled by a population tied to the Yamnaya and Eastern European Neolithic peoples. The genetic profile of these settlers remains dominant in Denmark today, with no trace of the first farmers, or the hunter-gatherers before them, at all.

With the rapid rate of distinctive DNA turnover and the a lack of mingling genetics, all signs point to overpowering conflicts that completely anihilated existing communities. Turning previous theories upside down, the researchers add that this new information also sheds light on migration and the movement of pathogens. Scientists have high hopes that advances in the sequencing of ancient DNA (aDNA) will soon lead to a better understanding and treatment of present-day disease.

“Our results help to enhance our knowledge of our heredity and our understanding of the development of certain diseases," Nielsen said. "Something that in the long term could be beneficial, for example in medical research."

The study is published in the journal Nature.

Source: Lund University

10 comments
10 comments
YourAmazonOrder
If they hunted livestock and gathered crops, they would have been killed. Back then looting wasn’t as tolerated as it is today.
TechGazer
My first thought is that the guy shot by arrows likely deserved it, by being greedy for what the farmers worked for. Losing hunting range to farming would have driven the hunters even more to try to loot the farmers. Farmers could afford to raise more children and develop better defenses, so it was a losing battle for hunter-gatherers. Simple evolution: the species or culture that is more efficient at exploiting resources wins.
Ric
Only a matter of time until we discover that Neanderthals met a similar fate…perhaps their brute strength and creativity bought them a little extra time and “respect.”
veryken
This is just geeky science to say that property owners killed off trespassers and intruders on their land regardless of whether the hungry invaders were four-legged beasts or two-legged people. Of course there’s no gradual transition.
Christian
Sounds like the Danes owe someone some reparations for colonizing that land so forcefully from the peaceful natives.
akarp
Kinda like Native Americans (in the Americas)?
DavidB
@YourAmazonOrder, you had to inject politics into the discussion?

In just two sentences you went from "Oh, fair point" to "Shut up, jerk."

On the whole, your comment is utterly void of useful content.
DavidB
@veryken, that almost sounds logical, except you got it completely backwards: The intruders were the farmers and keepers of animals. They wanted the land for crops and livestock. They killed off the wild herds and replaced native plant species with the crops they wanted to grow, both of which starved the people who depended on those animals and plants. Of course, they also fought with the hunter-gatherers to keep them off the lands they had roamed for generations in harmony with nature.

North America is a perfect analogy. There's no question who the "invaders" were, in Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
WhyEyeWine
Human violence.
Why does that ring a bell?
Christian
@DavidB Farmers can feed whole orders of magnitude more people with the same land than can be done by hunting and gathering. It's not like those hunter gatherers were the first there either, they took the land from someone/something weaker than them, too. I'm gonna side with the farmers on this one.