Electronics

Miniature fuel cell to keep drones aloft for over an hour and phones charged for a week

Miniature fuel cell to keep dr...
The new SOFC could power drones in flight for over and hour and see smartphones require charging just once a week
The new SOFC could power drones in flight for over and hour and see smartphones require charging just once a week
View 1 Image
The new SOFC could power drones in flight for over and hour and see smartphones require charging just once a week
1/1
The new SOFC could power drones in flight for over and hour and see smartphones require charging just once a week

Drones are being utilized in everything from parcel delivery to search and rescue, but their limited flight times are restricting their ability to travel great distances or stay for extended periods of time in the field. Simply adding more batteries, however, affects flight characteristics and reduces the load the drone can carry. To help solve this problem, researchers at the Pohang University of Science and Technology (Postech) have created a miniature fuel cell they claim not only provides enough energy to keep a drone in the sky for over an hour, but may well find applications in powering everything from smartphones to cars in the not-too-distant future.

Developed by Professor Gyeong Man Choi and his Ph.D. student Kun Joong Kim at Postech, the new solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is claimed by the researchers to be the first to use porous stainless steel in combination with thin-film electrolyte, all brought together using a technique known as tape casting-lamination-cofiring. Allied with electrodes of low heat capacity, this amalgamation not only results in increased performance, but also in higher long-term durability.

The team has aimed to improve upon previous SOFCs that used silicon but whose lithographically-etched components exhibited rapid degradation or low durability when experiencing thermal-expansion during operation, resulting in physical alignment problems with the electrolyte. As a result, silicon-based fuel cells are, according to the researchers, not seen as a viable replacement in electronic devices that require fast on/off capabilities. Using stainless steel, the team claims to overcome the biggest problems that have dogged SOFCs, namely the high operating temperatures of the units that results in longer start-up times and issues surrounding mechanical and chemical compatibility.

Referred to as a third-generation fuel cell, the Postech team's device boasts a simple structure and does not have any problems with corrosion of loss of the elctrolyte. It showed a peak power density of around 560 mW per cubic centimeter at 550° C (1,022° F) and maintained this power density during rapid thermal cycling. With this sort of power density and reliability, the team suggests the device may offer an alternative to lithium-ion batteries in a range of mobile electronics, such as smartphones and laptops. At just 78 mm2 per cell in size, the Postech device is also claimed to have fast on and off times similar to lithium-ion batteries and superior power densities that would allow smartphones that would only need to be charged once a week.

The Postech device generates power by converting hydrogen (in this case, "Wet" H2 gas comprising 97 percent H2 and  3 percent H2O mixture) supplied as fuel gas to the anode to create electricity. It does this through the use of a solid oxide material acting as the electrolyte that allows the conduction of negative oxygen ions from the cathode to the anode. These ions diffuse through the solid oxide electrolyte to the anode where they oxidize the fuel. This reaction produces electrons, which then flow through an external circuit to provide power.

Whilst the fuel cell is still in the prototype phase, the researchers believe that their research could result in the development of larger, less expensive (but with much higher-power density) fuel cells for use in vehicles in the not-too-distant future.

The results of this research were recently published were published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Source: Postech

12 comments
gizmowiz
I'll believe it when I see a commercial product.
tapasmonkey
Oh joy! ...one of the only advantages of these noisy flying lawnmowers was that they'd soon leave due to lack of battery. Inevitable I suppose, but still annoying.
Kpar
"It showed a peak power density of around 560 mW per cubic centimeter at 550° C (1,022° F)" I'm not sure I want that on my lap or in my pocket.
Douglas Bennett Rogers
1/2 watt/ cm**3 ? Not that impressive.
ezeflyer
Will they power a piloted quadcopter?
Stephen N Russell
How much & when for fuel cell micro charger, awesome, need for EVs too.
RowanMaltman
None of these battery claims ever happen. Ever. If you want to put some momentum behind it, make sample packs and send them to ebike groups, remote control websites, e.v forums and let them give some feedback. Why these groups? They are ADDICTED to longer run times and improved efficiency.
WingTangWong
First off... kinda click bait when you consider the cell as described would not be able to power a drone for any length of time... let alone hours. 450C-500C? 560mW/CM^3? Hmm... Lithium ion is 250 to 620 W·h/L. 1L=1000CM^3 So that puts the relative power density of the micro fuel cell, if/when it can be scaled up, to around 560Wh/L. Or around the same as a lithium ion battery. But... thats _just_ for the fuel cell itself. That does not take into account the volume of the H2 storage system, the control circuits, the batteries to power the control circuit and to initiate the temperature ramp up to 450C-500C. I'm sure the reaction is exothermic, but a good chunk of power would be consumed maintaining the active/usable temperature range. Which would further reduce the effective energy density of the power supply system as a whole. You would be looking at a sizable array of at least 14 parallel banks of multiple cells to produce the working voltage and current capacity. That's some serious weight, so you would be looking at a larger drone, which has higher energy requirements. What this means is that this technology is not meant for civilian drone use, but for military drone use, where the drones are about the size of a small airplane. At that size/scale, it would be practical. On a DJ Phantom sized drone... lithium remains king, unless you consider using a small ICE engine + generator to convert liquid fuel into electrical power. In which case, that solution would beat the micro fuel cell tech and be more reliable, cost effective, and have parts/tech that is readily available.
BigGoofyGuy
I wonder if this will lead to better fuel cells for manned fuel cell vehicles? I think it is a cool and green idea.
Augure
Nobody believes in new batteries anymore. The science is there, the tech is there, has been for 20 maybe 30 years in hundreds if not thousands of new iterations and finding, yet new batteries are not there, period.