Energy

Ultra-deep fracking for limitless geothermal power is possible: EPFL

View 3 Images
Deep geothermal power has a tremendous potential if it can be made practical
Quaise Energy
Deep geothermal power has a tremendous potential if it can be made practical
Quaise Energy
X-ray tomography scans of rock at different temperatures show that it's possible to fracture it for geothermal purposes well beyond the necessary depths
EPFL
View gallery - 3 images

The prospect of virtually unlimited clean geothermal power is now substantially brighter. EPFL’s Laboratory of Experimental Rock Mechanics (LEMR) has shown that the semi-plastic, gooey rock at supercritical depths can still be fractured to let water through.

Along with nuclear power in the form of fission or fusion – and one or two other cutting-edge sources, geothermal power holds the genuine promise of making the concept of general energy shortages as outdated as worrying about saber-toothed tigers. By tapping into the enormous heat of the Earth's interior, it's theoretically possible to extract enough clean power to meet all humanity's energy needs for millions of years to come, solving the biggest challenge of climate change more or less overnight.

The problem is that all that lovely energy is trapped miles beneath the Earth's crust, and the costs of reaching it are astronomical. As a result, today's geothermal power is a niche source that's only available in a few scattered volcanic regions where the heat's much closer to the surface – typically a long way from where the energy is needed.

But pretty much everywhere on the planet, there's a much more powerful supercritical geothermal resource waiting to be tapped, if you could just drill down far enough to get to the really hot rocks found way below the surface. We're still only talking about a fraction of the distance through the Earth's crust, but it's hot enough down there to heat water to temperatures over 400 °C (752 °F).

At these temperatures, water goes "supercritical" and starts acting like something halfway between a liquid and a gas, flowing as easily as a gas but retaining the density of a liquid. This phase can be used to extract a lot of energy. In practical terms, if you can get water up to supercritical temperatures, it can run a geothermal power plant with 10 times the output of a conventional one using lower-temperature water.

The bad news is that drilling to such depths – sometimes beyond the world-record 12 km (7.5 mile) depth of the Kola borehole – is currently beyond the cutting edge of engineering, although there are some very promising projects that could solve this issue in relatively short order.

The good news is that if we could master drilling that deep, we'd be able to set up geothermal plants pretty much anywhere on the planet – for example, on the abandoned sites of coal-fired power plants that have been shut down. They've already got the grid connections and plenty of steam turbine equipment, why not turn climate swords to ploughshares?

There are many issues yet to solve – one of them being that geothermal requires maximal contact between rock surfaces and the fluid they're heating, and one of the best ways to vastly increase that contact area is to fracture the rock in a process remarkably similar to the one used in oil and gas fracking. Fervo Energy has aptly demonstrated how much of a difference this approach can make to a geothermal plant.

But since nobody's ever drilled down that far, science hasn't been able to say whether the rock down there can crack and let water through. Observations taken close to the 10 km (6.2 mile) mark have shown rock starting to behave very differently to how it acts nearer the surface.

Instead of being hard and brittle, it gets soft and plastic and gooey – suggesting that it might not be possible to fracture rock and run water through it at supercritical temperatures.

At least, this was the picture until an EPFL team led by Gabriel Meyer did some laboratory tests using a new gas-based triaxial apparatus, high-resolution synchrotron 3D imagery, and finite element modeling.

"When you get near the 10-kilometer (6.2-mile) mark, the rock no longer fractures but instead deforms uniformly, like soft caramel, and its behavior becomes complex," said Meyer. "Deformation occurs at the level of the crystalline structures in the grain. I wanted to find out whether water could circulate within rock that has transitioned into this unusual ductile form."

What Meyer and his team did was reproduce the pressure and conditions found in the Earth's crust to observe how it changes during what is called the brittle-to-ductile transition (BDT). These laboratory tests are particularly important because it's nearly impossible to make such observations in the real world. Instead, the test rig recreated the temperature and pressure conditions in the rock sample, which was scanned with a synchrotron to create 3D images that were fed into a computer simulation.

They found that the rock acts less like putty than Silly Putty – the popular toy that acts like both a liquid and a solid. If you handle Silly Putty, you can easily mold it into whatever shape you like and if you set it down it will very slowly flow like a liquid. But the clever bit is that you can take this soft, flowing putty and if you hit it with a hammer, it shatters like glass.

According to the new EPFL study, the rock capping the supercritical zone acts in a similar way. Though it's ductile, it can be fractured so that water can flow through it. Meaning that with some sophisticated deep fracking technology, it might be feasible to build some very serious geothermal plants.

X-ray tomography scans of rock at different temperatures show that it's possible to fracture it for geothermal purposes well beyond the necessary depths
EPFL

“Geologists long thought that the brittle-to-ductile transition point was the lower bound for water circulation in the Earth’s crust,” says Meyer. “But we showed that water can also circulate in ductile rock. This is a highly promising discovery that opens up further avenues of research in our field.”

The work is particularly relevant to companies like Quaise Energy – an East Coast startup working to demonstrate that record-breaking super-deep geothermal boreholes can be sunk using particle accelerator technology developed for the fusion energy field, instead of drill bits that simply don't last that far down once the temperature comes up.

Companies like Fervo and Sage Geosystems are proving that a fracking approach to geothermal energy can extract much more power than traditional methods – this research proves that the concept could do the same for ultra-deep supercritical geothermal projects as well.

As stated before, if these companies succeed, and manage to bring this kind of power plant to the market at scale, humanity's ongoing energy needs simply cease to be a problem. Clean, grid-responsive, 24/7, virtually limitless... There's a lot of cause for optimism here in theory, and while many unprecedented problems remain to be solved, we hope there's more progress to report on soon.

The research was published in Nature Communications.

Source: EPFL

View gallery - 3 images
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
11 comments
TAMMY MURPHY
Although geothermal energy as described here would be hugely beneficial, we must not make the mistake of ignoring radioactive emissions. As Justin Nobel's book Petroleum 238 acknowledges, radiation travels from the source deep in the earth at the point of extraction and throughout the unconventional gas development industry. As radioactivity travels throughout the transportation and storage phases and stocks to solids building upon itself throughout the system.
Jinpa
Superheated steam would be in a closed system which recirculates the steam as water once it has spun the turbines and cooled, so no release at the earth's surface. The system can achieve a siphon effect, so little or no pumping would be required, Fervo stories report. Radioactive steam or water would be easily detected. Relatively shallow availability of hot rock is mostly available in the U.S. in and west of the Rockies, geo maps show.
Richard Brandless
Good thing Elon is trying to get us to Mars... stop the fracking, it is not needed.
1stClassOPP
So, how do you think drilling thousands of bore holes miles deep will effect the delicate balance of heat/ cold on the earth’s surface? I don’t think you need a PHD to understand that for every action there must be a reaction. I’m guessing that if you cool the earth’s centre eventually all earthly systems as we now know them, will change.
PaulP
When I see the many billions poured into creating fusion power world-wide and then consider the (relatively) minuscule cost of the Quaise operation (and similar) I start to wonder where our logic is leading us....use existing generation and distribution sites? Yes. Use existing (safe) drilling technologies? Yes again. Setup anywhere on the planet i.e. where power is actually needed? Well, the answer's "Yes" again.
As to impacting "the delicate balance of heat/ cold on the earth’s surface" I think all of our energy extractions would amount to less than a flea on the back of a gnat on the back of an elephant!
windykites
Why the need to drill so deep? Surely enough heat is available at lesser depths?
TechGazer
They've shown that the soft rock _can_ fracture, but that doesn't say anything about what happens after. Will the cracks close again?

Another question: what happens to the rock when you flow supercritical water through it? Even silica dissolves in supercritical water, so how long before your high surface area fractures become one low surface area tunnel? What happens to the dissolved minerals when the water cools enough to be not supercritical? Plugged pipes and turbines or heat exchangers? You might get some valuable minerals out of that, but you'd also have mounds of toxic minerals that might not have a market where the downhole is. Non-supercritical shallower holes might end up more economical.
michael_dowling
windykites: The article touches on this: geothermal *is* accessible in select locations,such as Iceland,but usually it is much deeper.
Ancliff
@1stClassOPP
This is a billionth of a flea bite level of effect. The thermal mass of the Earth is vast and will not be affected. The only setback if this got going would be if we then used so much of the thermal energy we were once again in danger of heating the atmosphere.
T.pot
Sounds like a good idea and worthwhile especially for areas that are currently with little to no reliable power source.
But there are some countries where there are usable deep mines, not currently working.
Would these be possible development stites as some are already a mile or more below the surface.
All that would be required is the below surface site to be expanded and made ready for the necessary equipment.
Not as easy as that, but I am sure with the right mind-set and planning it would be doable.