Energy

Virginia's fusion power plant: A step toward infinite energy

Virginia's fusion power plant: A step toward infinite energy
A rendering of what the SPARC tokamak would look like inside the ARC power plant
A rendering of what the SPARC tokamak would look like inside the ARC power plant
View 3 Images
A rendering of what the SPARC tokamak would look like inside the ARC power plant
1/3
A rendering of what the SPARC tokamak would look like inside the ARC power plant
The ARC facility would occupy 25 acres of the 100-acre plot of land in Chesterfield County, Virginia
2/3
The ARC facility would occupy 25 acres of the 100-acre plot of land in Chesterfield County, Virginia
A cutaway render of the ARC, which contains the 100-million-degree Celsius plasma with superconducting magnets
3/3
A cutaway render of the ARC, which contains the 100-million-degree Celsius plasma with superconducting magnets
View gallery - 3 images

No, this isn't the return of Marvel's Iron Man; Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) has announced plans to build the world's first grid-scale fusion power plant near Richmond, Virginia.

After more than 100 locations around the world were scouted, CFS chose a 100-acre (40.5-ha) plot of land in Chesterfield County in Virginia for the ARC – an acronym for "Affordable, Robust, Compact" – to be built. This fusion power plant aims to produce a continuous 400 megawatts of clean, virtually limitless energy by the early 2030s.

If the name "ARC" rings a bell, it's because it shares the same name as the fictional ARC reactor invented by Marvel Comics' Tony Stark to power his Iron Man suit and more. While Stark's mini fusion reactor was small enough to hold in his hand, the real-world CFS version will be closer to the size of a warehouse. No superhero suit included (yet).

A cutaway render of the ARC, which contains the 100-million-degree Celsius plasma with superconducting magnets
A cutaway render of the ARC, which contains the 100-million-degree Celsius plasma with superconducting magnets

Fusion, the process of fusing atomic nuclei to release vast amounts of energy, is the same reaction that powers stars like our Sun. Unlike nuclear fission – which splits atoms and creates dangerous radioactive waste – fusion uses hydrogen isotopes (like tritium and deuterium) and produces helium as a harmless byproduct. It's long been the "holy grail" of clean, unlimited energy and has the potential to revolutionize the global energy landscape.

The SPARC reactor will utilize an entirely new system of high-temperature superconducting magnets designed by CFS to confine superheated plasma at temperatures of over 100 million degrees Celsius in a donut-shaped containment vessel called a tokamak.

The goal is to achieve a steady burn which will continuously produce electricity like a conventional power plant. If successful, it could power 150,000 homes without the environmental downsides of fossil fuels.

Though fusion is inherently safer than fission, it's not entirely without risk. High-energy neutrons released during the fusion process can degrade reactor materials, making maintenance a constant concern. Over time, the neutrons will effectively irradiate the reactor and surrounding materials. Tritium fuel, which is mildly radioactive, requires careful handling to prevent leaks.

The ARC facility would occupy 25 acres of the 100-acre plot of land in Chesterfield County, Virginia
The ARC facility would occupy 25 acres of the 100-acre plot of land in Chesterfield County, Virginia

Another challenge, which has only recently been "conquered," is plasma containment. Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR) managed a 48-second-long continuous plasma burn in February of 2024 – the longest to date. Unlike the Sun, which relies on intense gravitational pressure to sustain plasma, fusion reactors use magnetic fields or lasers to stabilize the reaction. CFS's SPARC tokamak design uses magnets. Any disruption in the process, like loss of power or mechanical failure would cause the plasma to cool almost instantly – in milliseconds – and thus cause the reaction to stop.

Fusion power represents a near-perfect energy solution. It's abundant, clean, and sustainable. A single gram of fuel can produce as much energy as 10 tons (9 tonnes) of coal and could theoretically power one US home for 850 years while producing much lower levels of radioactive waste that poses a much lower risk than that produced in plants that rely on nuclear fission.

Virginia's ARC reactor project could pave the way for a better future. While some challenges still need to be overcome, if CFS is able to deliver on its promises, limitless, clean energy could step out of science fiction and into reality.

World’s First Grid-Scale Fusion Power Plant Coming to Virginia

Source: Commonwealth Fusion Systems

View gallery - 3 images
8 comments
8 comments
FreddyB
I would be putting my money on TAE Technologies. The conventional tokomak design has too many drawbacks (see article). TAE uses H + B fusion that produces no tritium or reactive components. This fusion requires higher energies, so they have their challenges. I'm just glad to see more investment and multiple different approaches being followed. I think that no matter which type, it will take many years and I hope that the investment can continue to support them.
joeblake
"The goal is to achieve a steady burn which will continuously produce electricity like a conventional power plant. If successful, it could power 150,000 homes without the environmental downsides of fossil fuels."
A bit misleading I'd say. Under the First Law of Thermodynamics (Conservation of Energy), every watt of power produced by any non-renewable system will eventually be dumped into the environment, raising the temperature. These losses can occur at the plant level (from all the cooling towers spewing steam), losses via the transmission lines, at the transformers (from low voltage to high and stepping down again) with their oil-filled cooling coils, and at the final destination, whether a steel furnace or a kitchen stove. With urban concentrations, there can occur an event called "heat islanding"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_heat_island
with houses running air conditioning to cool off while the dumped heat raises the local temperature, needing more power to help the citizens keep cool, and so forth.
" While some challenges still need to be overcome, if CFS is able to deliver on its promises, limitless, clean energy could step out of science fiction and into reality" and into the environment.
yawood
@joeblake "losses via the transmission lines, at the transformers ....." Those loses occur with any power generation, including the so-called renewables. As good as they are, solar power, wind power etc will never be the complete answer. We need a mix and this is a good addition to the mix, as is other forms of nuclear power.
StefanL
I would be putting my money on Helion Energy.
joeblake
@yawood. Whilst some of what you say is true, "renewable" energy generation (as the name implies) utilises energy which is ALREADY present in the environment, without adding an additional load. The words "limitless energy" do NOT bode well for the environment. If you do a modicum of research you will find that storage technology is advancing far more quickly than fusion technology, which will negate one of the "problems" with renewal. The sun doesn't always shine, blah, blah. The "problem" is not really energy per se. It's collecting and harnessing it. Many countries like Australia have far more energy than can be utilised and already projects are under way to store this. By the time fusion is a commercial possibility there won't be a market for it. The expression "stranded asset" comes to mind.
MCG
The sun helped to form the Earth and its core long ago. Geothermal which is 24/7, safe, and becoming more accessible through technology is looking better to me every year. Especially when combined with battery storage solutions like Tesla offers and sand batteries.
Captain Obvious
How much do these things cost to build and run? Fission power is more expensive than renewables and takes much longer to build.
bwana4swahili
"if CFS is able to deliver on its promises, limitless, clean energy could step out of science fiction and into reality." Developers/researchers have been saying this for the past 50+ years... I'm not hopeful!