Ocean temperatures hit highest levels ever recorded
Where some consequences of climate change are plain to see, like the bushfires currently ravaging Australia, others require us to look beneath the surface – but that doesn't make them any less significant. As the planet has continued to warm, nowhere has this been felt more than its oceans, which absorb the majority of extra heat captured as a result of greenhouse gas emissions. A new study has laid bare the alarming reality of this trend, with the analysis revealing the world's oceans were warmer in 2019 than any other time in recorded human history.
The research was carried out by an international team of scientists representing 11 institutes across the world, and made use of a new analysis technique developed at China's Institute of Atmospheric Physics, which the researchers say allowed for more accurate temperature measurements dating back to the 1950s.
According to the team's analysis, the temperature of the oceans in 2019 were around 0.075° C (0.135° F) above the 1981-2010 average. To put that into units of energy required to generate that warmth, the scientists calculate that the ocean has soaked up 228,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (228 sextillion) joules of heat.
"That's a lot of zeros indeed," says Lijing Cheng, lead author and associate professor at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics. "To make it easier to understand, I did a calculation. The Hiroshima atom-bomb exploded with an energy of about 63,000,000,000,000 Joules. The amount of heat we have put in the world's oceans in the past 25 years equals to 3.6 billion Hiroshima atom-bomb explosions. This measured ocean warming is irrefutable and is further proof of global warming. There are no reasonable alternatives aside from the human emissions of heat trapping gases to explain this heating."
The scientists also looked at the last six or so decades of ocean warming, comparing the 1955-1986 period to the years between 1987 and 2019. The data revealed that the recent period was around 450 percent more severe, illustrating not just how the oceans (and planet) continue to warm, but how they are doing so at an accelerating pace.
"It is critical to understand how fast things are changing," says John Abraham, co-author and professor of mechanical engineering at the University of St. Thomas in the United States. "The key to answering this question is in the oceans – that's where the vast majority of heat ends up. If you want to understand global warming, you have to measure ocean warming."
More than 90 percent of global warming since 1970 has been absorbed by the oceans, according to the team. This has implications for the severity of tropical storms and weather, rising sea levels and marine life. Australia's Great Barrier Reef, which recently endured a string of severe bleaching events and vast coral die-offs, is one example.
"The price we pay is the reduction of ocean-dissolved oxygen, the harmed marine lives, strengthening storms and reduced fisheries and ocean-related economies," Cheng says. "However, the more we reduce greenhouse gasses, the less the ocean will warm. Reduce, reuse and recycle and transferring to a clean energy society are still the major way forward."
The research was published in the journal Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.
Please keep comments to less than 150 words. No abusive material or spam will be published.
Watching Tony Heller's video showing how the "data" used to convince officials that we are all going to die in 12 years was cherry picked, at minute 3:20 or so he speaks of arctic ice sheet coverage - at least watch that part to get a sense of what has really been measured. And even that only goes back to the 1970's; knowing as we do there was a mini ice age 7-8000 years ago tells us the ice sheet spread much further south, no? The point is, given climate is always dynamic and changing (and has been for billions of years), it seems rather arrogant to implicitly make the claim that because the ocean is the warmest in "all the recorded time that man has measured it" it has actual weight.
What do you make of this from NASA
Probably the first thing that should be noted is that the amount they say 2019 was warmer (0.075ºC) is less than the actual data uncertainty, which makes the claim rather tenuous at best. And despite claims made by non-statisticians (and even some statisticians), "homogenizing" this type of rather enormously non-homogeneous data does not reduce the uncertainty.
Add to that questionable adjustments that have been made by the climate science community (and I am referring to water temperatures, not CO2), you have a very questionable claim at best.
A decade or two from now, we might be able to make some real conclusions based on ARGO network data, but that has known issues, too.
I'd want to know a lot more about that Chinese "analysis technique" before I put any faith in it.