Sleep

Microbreaks at work can increase engagement and reduce fatigue

Research suggests it is important to give workers autonomy over when they take microbreaks
Research suggests it is important to give workers autonomy over when they take microbreaks

New research published in the Journal of Applied Psychology suggests employees are more engaged and less fatigued when given the freedom to take brief, impromptu "microbreaks" whenever they feel the need throughout a workday.

For many office workers, lunchtime is the only real breakaway from the focus of a long workday. And even then, one survey found over half those questioned said they end up eating lunch at their desk.

Employers perhaps don’t look kindly upon those workers who seem to take frequent microbreaks. It may seem like lots of little chats with colleagues or short jaunts from one’s desk belie an unfocused mind, but a growing body of research is starting to indicate consistent tiny breaks can reduce fatigue, improve well-being, and ultimately enhance general work engagement.

“A microbreak is, by definition, short,” explains Sophia Cho, from North Carolina State University and co-author on the new study. “But a five-minute break can be golden if you take it at the right time.”

The new research surveyed the behaviors of two cohorts of office workers, 98 subjects in the United States and 222 subjects in South Korea. As well as tracking movements across a given workday, the surveys asked about sleep quality and general levels of fatigue.

The researchers were interested in how fatigue in the morning, perhaps from a bad night of sleep, influenced the frequency of microbreaks throughout the subsequent workday. Unsurprisingly, those more tired in the morning took more frequent microbreaks. But importantly, those engaging in microbreaks reported better overall work engagement and less fatigue at the end of the day.

“Basically, microbreaks help you manage your energy resources over the course of the day – and that’s particularly beneficial on days when you’re tired,” notes Cho.

One key to the benefits of microbreaks, Cho explains, is allowing employees the freedom to choose when to take the break. This means organizations cannot rigorously schedule this kind of activity but instead it requires a degree of trust and autonomy in an employee.

“Our study shows that it is in a company’s best interest to give employees autonomy in terms of taking microbreaks when they are needed,” says Cho. “When people think their employer cares about their health, they feel more empowered to freely make decisions about when to take microbreaks and what type of microbreaks to take. And that is ultimately good for both the employer and the employee.”

The idea of breaking a workday up into shorter periods of focus, interspersed with brief fleeting breaks, goes back to a key study in the 1980s. That research found breaking up 40 minute periods of sustained focus with short pauses led to lower heart rates and less work errors. However, the research at the time struggled to home in on an ideal microbreak duration – 30 seconds, for example, was not long enough.

Since then, plenty of studies have uncovered benefits to fragmenting a workday with microbreaks. From 40-second breaks looking at green city views to sporadic stretches of time surfing the internet for personal interest, a variety of microbreak methods have been proposed.

And while no general all-purpose methodology for how to best microbreak has been uncovered, this new research suggests employee autonomy is fundamental allowing individuals to modulate their own energy and engagement levels across a workday.

The new study was published in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

Source: NC State

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
2 comments
Douglas Rogers
This must apply more to assembly line work, rather than office or lab work.
Worzel
After WW2, many employers complained that workers were demanding morning and afternoon tea breaks, like they had enjoyed in the military.
The military had found that, regular breaks made for more alert personnel.
When I was in university, we were told that classes were limited to 45 mins in length, and then a 15 minute break to change classes, because 45 minutes was the average limit for most students to tolerate one lecturer. (Sometimes, for some lecturer's, it was significantly less.)
There's an old saying, ''More haste, less speed.'' and it probably applies to work, any work, as well.
The problem with most employers, it seems, is, as usual, GREED!
They want their 'Pound of Flesh' for the salaries they pay.
I've only suffered from that problem once, during a temp job during college holidays. One Forman objected to me eating a donut and drinking a coffee, while I worked. I pointed out that other men stopped to roll a cigarette and smoke it, ''Thats different'' he said. I asked him how, but got no sensible response. My conclusion, he's an idiot!