"Cosmic magnet" recreated in lab as alternative to rare earths

"Cosmic magnet" recreated in lab as alternative to rare earths
A meteorite sample rich in tetrataenite
A meteorite sample rich in tetrataenite
View 1 Image
A meteorite sample rich in tetrataenite
A meteorite sample rich in tetrataenite

Rare earth elements are a key part of electronic and mechanical devices, but they’re in short supply. Now, scientists have found a way to recreate a promising alternative – a “cosmic magnet” that normally takes millions of years to form in meteorites can now be cooked up in the lab in seconds.

Many of our electronic devices and mechanical components rely on rare earths. That’s especially true for greener technologies – high-performance magnets, which are vital for everything from wind turbines to electric cars, require these elements. But unfortunately, although not actually rare in the Earth's crust, they’re difficult to mine and their production is currently concentrated in China, leading to supply concerns.

“Rare earth deposits exist elsewhere, but the mining operations are highly disruptive: you have to extract a huge amount of material to get a small volume of rare earths,” said Professor Lindsay Greer, lead researcher on the study. “Between the environmental impacts, and the heavy reliance on China, there’s been an urgent search for alternative materials that do not require rare earths.”

As such, scientists have been investigating ways to recycle rare earths from old batteries and electronics, extract them from new sources like wastewater, and find more common minerals that could perform similar functions.

In the new study, researchers from Cambridge investigated a promising alternative called tetrataenite. This mineral is an alloy of iron and nickel arranged in a stacked crystalline structure, which gives it magnetic properties similar to those of rare earth magnets. The advantage of course is that iron and nickel are much easier to come by.

The problem is, tetrataenite is tricky to find – it mostly shows up in meteorite samples, where it’s thought to have taken millions of years to form. Previous attempts to produce it artificially in the lab have shown some success, but the techniques aren’t scalable.

On closer inspection of meteorite samples of tetrataenite, the team found that phosphorus was in the mix, helping to speed up the arrangement of the iron and nickel atoms into the stack structure. So, they mixed iron, nickel and phosphorus together in specific quantities, and found that tetrataenite formed up to 15 orders of magnitude faster – essentially, in seconds.

“What was so astonishing was that no special treatment was needed: we just melted the alloy, poured it into a mold, and we had tetrataenite,” said Greer. “The previous view in the field was that you couldn’t get tetrataenite unless you did something extreme, because otherwise, you’d have to wait millions of years for it to form. This result represents a total change in how we think about this material.”

The team says this discovery could lead to a viable alternative to rare-earth magnets – although more work will be required to check whether tetrataenite created this way will work in these magnets.

The research was published in the journal Advanced Science.

Source: University of Cambridge

Now we just have to find more phosphorus which is in alarmingly low supply.
Robyn Kiriko Takami
Go Science! 🍻🥂📣
The article doesn't mention magnetic strength. A comparison between this new material and the common alloys presently used for permanent magnets would have been useful. To me, the lack of that obvious information means that the comparison isn't favourable.
The paper doesn't seem to say anything about the magnetic properties, so it's not clear how it compares to rare-earth magnets.
@Craig--Phosphorus is easy to get. Just pay people for their pee.
I must have missed where they actually present and compare tesla strength with Neodymium and others.
A promising start! We just need to wait for them to finish examining the samples. BTW if anyone is curious these are the magnetic stats from the natural version of this stuff:

Tetrataenite displays permanent magnetization, in particular, high coercivity. It has a theoretical magnetic energy product, the maximum amount of magnetic energy stored, over 335 kJ m−3.
Abraham Miller
On the questions of magnetic properties, from the paper:
"While the hard-magnetic properties of tetrataenite are attractive, those demonstrated so far do not surpass those of Nd2Fe14B,[1, 2] although the maximum energy product of meteoritic samples may have been underestimated.[25] The properties would be improved by increasing the degree of chemical order,[18] as shown in the present work to be possible by annealing. Ab-initio calculations suggest that judicious alloying can increase saturation magnetization, coercivity, and magnetocrystalline anisotropy.[30, 31]

The present castings and microstructures would be far from optimal for a high-performance permanent magnet; we have not, for example, applied a magnetic field to polarize our samples (as in the pioneering studies[3, 26]). Yet the wide processing window revealed in the present work facilitates exploration of compositions to achieve industrial-scale synthesis of tetrataenite. Tetrataenite thus obtained would not only provide useful permanent-magnet performance in the wide range between ferrites and Nd2Fe14B[2] but could also attain properties rivaling those of the best rare-earth-based magnets."
The article mentions that tetrataenite is a good magnet material compared to NIB but it doesn't give a value relative to NIB. WhY?