Materials

Iron-fortified lumber could be a greener alternative to steel beams

Iron-fortified lumber could be a greener alternative to steel beams
One of the red oak cubes utilized in the study (bottom, on black square) undergoes analysis
One of the red oak cubes utilized in the study (bottom, on black square) undergoes analysis
View 2 Images
One of the red oak cubes utilized in the study (bottom, on black square) undergoes analysis
1/2
One of the red oak cubes utilized in the study (bottom, on black square) undergoes analysis
A microCT image shows the distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles (turquoise) in wood cell walls
2/2
A microCT image shows the distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles (turquoise) in wood cell walls

Although lumber does show promise as a renewable alternative to structural materials such as steel and concrete, it still tends to be a bit weaker than those substances. Scientists have now set about addressing that shortcoming, by strengthening wood with added iron.

Led by Asst. Prof. Vivian Merk, a team of researchers at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) started out with cubes of untreated red oak hardwood. Red oak – along with hardwoods like maple, cherry and walnut – is an example of what's known as ring-porous wood. In a nutshell, this means that it utilizes large ring-shaped internal vessels to draw water up from the tree's roots to its leaves.

The scientists proceeded to mix ferric nitrate with potassium hydroxide, creating a hard iron oxide mineral called nanocrystalline ferrihydrite, which occurs naturally in soil and water. Utilizing a vacuum impregnation process, nanoparticles of that ferrihydrite were drawn into the wood and deposited inside of its individual cell walls.

This action served to strengthen those walls, thus increasing the stiffness and hardness of the wood by 260.5% and 127%, respectively. That said, when the modified red oak wood did bend or break, it did so in a manner much like that of unmodified test samples. This is likely due to the fact that although the wood's cell walls had been strengthened, the bonds between the cells had not.

A microCT image shows the distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles (turquoise) in wood cell walls
A microCT image shows the distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles (turquoise) in wood cell walls

Importantly, the addition of the ferrihydrite nanoparticles increased the weight of the wood by only a small amount. Additionally, because the particles are nontoxic, they shouldn't pose a threat to the environment when the wood is eventually discarded or recycled.

"Our researchers are laying the groundwork for a new generation of bio-based materials that have the potential to replace traditional materials like steel and concrete in structural applications," says Dr. Stella Batalama, dean of FAU's College of Engineering and Computer Science.

"The impact of this work reaches far beyond the field of engineering – it contributes to global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, cut down on waste, and embrace sustainable, nature-inspired solutions for everything from buildings to large-scale infrastructure."

A paper on the research – which also involved scientists from the University of Miami and Oak Ridge National Laboratory – was recently published in the journal ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces.

In a previous study, a team at Georgia Tech determined that impregnating wood with different types of metal oxide additionally helped keep it from rotting.

Source: Florida Atlantic University

4 comments
4 comments
Alan
Iron makes that wood heavy like steel also!
TechGazer
How effective and economical is the vacuum impregnation process? What works on small samples may not be economical for construction-sized timbers. Wood preservative doesn't penetrate as deeply into timbers as users would like. Making the outer 1 cm of a beam stronger might make a difference, but I expect the impregnation process works best along the grain, which means it'll penetrate further in from the ends, but not deep across the grain.
It could make structural timbers in dollhouses stronger ... if anyone made dollhouses from wood anymore.
Karmudjun
Since this technique has been used for decades in treating lumber - and we know the danger to our tools for sizing the lumber - what might the airborne repercussions be to woodworkers fitting these modified pieces of lumber to a structure? Have the researchers actually performed this on commercial scale lumber or were they working with small samples in the lab. I'll believe this hype when they use commercial treatment systems to produce commercial lumber fortified with the ferrihydrite nanoparticles. And as an aside - will this make sapwood lumber like pine as strong as red oak? Nice article, source behind a paywall, vague phrases like "slightly heavier".
ljaques
I believe that a similar process is used to embed copper into structural timbers for pressure treating. They soak and heat the wood in the mixture under vacuum, then add pressure to the tank, drain it, and stack the lumber for a month to dry. That process leaves PT lumber with a copper azole layer no more than 5mm thick on each side. As a handyman, I found that plain douglas fir lumber lasted twice as long as any brand of CCA or CA treated lumber, even when all cuts were coated with preservative. I'm not real keen on this new iron treatment due to much higher price, accelerated tool wear, higher shipping prices due to extra weight, and the history of this or similar wood treatments.