Space

Most of Mars' missing water may still be there – underground

Most of Mars' missing water ma...
Mars as it may have looked 4.5 billion years ago
Mars as it may have looked 4.5 billion years ago
View 1 Image
Mars as it may have looked 4.5 billion years ago
1/1
Mars as it may have looked 4.5 billion years ago

Mars may currently be a dusty desert, but that wasn’t always the case – a growing body of evidence points to the Red Planet being much bluer in its ancient past. Where all that water went is a key question, and now researchers at JPL and Caltech have put forward a new answer: underground.

Roughly four billion years ago, Mars may have looked much like Earth. Studies suggest it housed an ocean in its northern hemisphere that contained as much water as half of our own Atlantic Ocean. But fast forward a billion years and it’s drier than any desert on Earth, leaving just dusty old lakebeds and the scars of old rivers for rovers and orbiters to study.

So where did all that water go? The generally accepted answer is that it escaped into space. With less gravity than Earth, Mars has a harder time holding onto its atmosphere, and over the course of a billion years or so huge amounts of water vapor could drift off into space.

While some of its water certainly would have escaped in this manner, the researchers on the new study found that this process can’t account for all of it. By their calculations, at least 30 percent of the original water – and perhaps as much as 99 percent – is still there. Rather than escaping up, it escaped down into minerals in the planet's crust.

The researchers examined how much water existed on Mars throughout its history, in the forms of liquid, vapor and ice. They also studied the chemical composition of the planet’s atmosphere and crust.

In particular, they were focusing on the ratio of “light” to “heavy” hydrogen. Deuterium is a rarer, heavier isotope of hydrogen with an extra neutron in its atomic nucleus, and because of this it’s less likely to be lost to space than the lighter form. That means that over time, if water vapor was escaping into space it would leave behind a higher ratio of deuterium to regular hydrogen in the atmosphere.

When the team examined this ratio, they found that it couldn’t account for the amount of water that should have escaped into space, based on how much of the stuff Mars used to hold. Instead, they suggest that the vast majority of it seeped into minerals in the ground and became trapped there.

"Atmospheric escape clearly had a role in water loss, but findings from the last decade of Mars missions have pointed to the fact that there was this huge reservoir of ancient hydrated minerals whose formation certainly decreased water availability over time," says Bethany Ehlmann, co-author of the study.

A similar thing happens on Earth, but with one major difference: Mars isn’t very tectonically active. On Earth, the absorbed water is recycled back into the atmosphere through plate tectonics and volcanism, but on Mars it just stays underground.

"All of this water was sequestered fairly early on, and then never cycled back out," says Eva Scheller, lead author of the study.

The question of whether Mars' water went up or down is one that the fresh-faced Perseverance rover could help answer. Meanwhile, the next steps for the team are to perform similar analyses for the cycles of nitrogen and sulfur minerals, as well as run lab test simulations of weathering processes on Mars.

The research was published in the journal Science.

Source: Caltech

6 comments
paul314
Does that mean the water might be relatively readily available by processing the minerals? (Leaving a planet covered with mountains of spoil...)
guzmanchinky
Let's get some Texans and a drill rig on up there! :)
ChairmanLMAO
Wonder how many people still believe there is no water on Mars.
Buzzclick
OK then, if there are subterranean water sources on Mars, how deep are they? An ordinary drilling rig for water here on Earth (80-200 feet) weighs maybe 25-35 tons (guestimate). We are not even close to space transporting and landing that much weight to the red planet. So let's hope the water is near the surface. Of course, it also depends on the type of substrate and its rock/mineral content. A Mars drilling rig could also be designed to be smaller/lighter but can still reach the needed depths for that precious liquid.
toni24
Total Recall anyone?
guzmanchinky
toni24 YES! You totally nailed it, I totally forgot about that part of that movie!