Technology

H2Starfire engine: A new and insanely efficient type of rotary

H2Starfire engine: A new and insanely efficient type of rotary
The H2Starfire engine promises insanely efficient combustion power with zero NOx emissions and clean water as the only byproduct
The H2Starfire engine promises insanely efficient combustion power with zero NOx emissions and clean water as the only byproduct
View 3 Images
The H2Starfire engine promises insanely efficient combustion power with zero NOx emissions and clean water as the only byproduct
1/3
The H2Starfire engine promises insanely efficient combustion power with zero NOx emissions and clean water as the only byproduct
Astron Aerospace H2Starfire engine design
2/3
Astron Aerospace H2Starfire engine design
Screen grab from Astron Aerospace demonstration video
3/3
Screen grab from Astron Aerospace demonstration video
View gallery - 3 images

Astron aerospace has shown a partial prototype of a new rotary combustion engine it claims runs at an extraordinary 60% thermal efficiency, burning totally clean with zero NOx emissions and nothing but fresh water out of the tailpipe.

With internal combustion engines (ICE) on the way out and electric vehicles (EV) on the way in – both politically and environmentally – innovative ways of using renewable energy for clean transportation are at the forefront of many engineering minds.

Astron Aerospace has recently announced its latest novel innovative engine, the H2Starfire. It's a sort of Wankel-rotary design, but with an interesting twist: there are no planetary gears or apex seals. Instead, there are two counter-rotating shafts that have incredibly tight, frictionless tolerances, using ceramic coatings and titanium to prevent the escape of pressurized gas and mitigate heat deformation. We're talking 0.002-0.004 of an inch (less than 0.1 mm) tolerances.

The "H2," of course, stands for hydrogen – a gas that's notoriously difficult to store and transport. The most common method of producing hydrogen as it stands is steam methane reforming – cheap, but not green. You can also make it by splitting water in an electrolyzer using renewable energy, which makes it green, but not cheap. You then need to squash it to 700 times atmospheric pressure, or cool it close to absolute zero to store it – and even then, it'll boil off, and its tiny molecules will gradually sneak out straight through the walls of metal containers.

Compared to batteries, it's an inefficient and ornery way to store energy. But when burned at temperatures under 1,400 °F (760 °C) in the right conditions, it'll happily run a combustion engine that provides all the noise, vibrations and mechanical drama that petrolheads are scared to lose – and the only byproducts emitted are clean, pure water and a few unfortunate nitrous oxides (NOx) at higher temperatures. Many companies appear to view hydrogen combustion as the clean future of 'enthusiast'-grade vehicles.

Astron Aerospace H2Starfire engine design
Astron Aerospace H2Starfire engine design

And that's the plan for the Astron H2Starfire. Using two sets of counter-rotating rotors with an aluminum front half for the engine's intake and compression and a titanium rear half for expansion and exhaust, Astron claims it's been able to eliminate the need for water cooling entirely, reducing weight and complexity, and achieving greater than 60% thermal efficiency.

For comparison, a typical car engine runs at closer to 20% thermal efficiency according to Green Car Reports, meaning 80% of the energy released in combustion is lost as waste heat. The best street car engines get closer to 40%, and you might get 50% from a Formula One engine built out of yeti teeth and unicorn dandruff. Sixty percent is an extraordinary claim.

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof, and while Astron appears to have built and run a partial prototype, we don't feel this proof currently qualifies as extraordinary:

But Astron is so confident in its design efficiency – and its ability to run cool – that it claims the engine produces zero NOx emissions. These are unavoidable when fuel is burned in air over about 1,300 °C (2,370 °F), and some of the nitrogen in the air starts to burn.

Air is drawn in via carburation or fuel injection through the front half of the engine, where it is squeezed down and compressed to 200-300 psi (13.8-20.6 bar) – very much like a compressor – and injected with hydrogen fuel before escaping through a fixed vent port into the center of the engine that connects both halves. Once the air and fuel combination have passed to the rear, a spark or glow plug ignites the mixture, causing explosive compression to spin the lower output shaft, before exhausting clean water vapor out of the opposite side of the engine.

All of this happens on a 270° rotation that idles at 1,000 rpm, and revs up to a screaming 25,000 rpm, perfectly timed with a set of connected gears on each of the upper and lower shafts. It's difficult to imagine, but Astron provides a video to show the process:

H2 STARFIRE Explained

If you know anything about traditional rotary engines, oil consumption is an issue. Since the H2Starfire is a completely linear rotating engine design, there's no need for apex seals. As we mentioned earlier, Astron claims the engine is nearly frictionless, and tolerances are so tight that only the the timing gears and bearings need oiling. In fact, the entire design of the engine is only 82 individual parts.

According to one source (which I'm thus far unable to verify as a real person), the H2Starfire is compact. Really compact. And it makes gobs of horsepower and torque. At 11.4 x 12.5 x 17.3 inches (29 x 32 x 44 cm) and weighing a fairly hefty 120 lb (54 kg), it produces 400 hp (298 kW) and 500 lb-ft (678 nm) of torque.

Screen grab from Astron Aerospace demonstration video
Screen grab from Astron Aerospace demonstration video

We've reached out to Astron Aerospace for more information, but after several days we've received nothing in response.

We'd love to hear from the company (and hopefully see something better than a video of someone turning the motor over with a power drill to qualify as a working demonstration) ... We'll run an update if and when we learn more.

It's no small effort bringing a new combustion engine to market, let alone a new type of rotary ... Let alone bringing a hydrogen-powered rotary into a market where hydrogen fuel is still incredibly scarce.

But a super-efficient, clean-burning combustion engine with zero NOx emissions ... For those of us who will always love the scream of a highly-tuned combustion motor and the mechanical joy of a gearbox and clutch, innovations like this give some hope that the fully immersive driving experience we've enjoyed for more than a century might yet have a future.

Source: Astron Aerospace

View gallery - 3 images
13 comments
13 comments
Smokey_Bear
All in vein.
ICE is done, and hydrogen took to long, upping the efficiency of it no longer matters.
BEV is the way forward, and I'm not just talking cars, but aircraft as well. Only thing stopping that from growing quicker is battery tech, which is constantly improving, and will continue at a faster rate, since so much money is being poured into R&D.
vince
With efficiency of 60 % you have to factor in the inefficiency of producing the hydrogen fuel itself which is notoriously energy ineficient and dirty. Combine the two and your only marginally more efficient and clean than better gas cars. Give it up hydrogen lovers..
spyinthesky
Certainly feel advances in producing hydrogen efficiently and economically in bulk let alone storage and supply will be considerably slower to develop than in battery technology. But anything that improves matters is welcome and may have useful specialist uses.
Brian M
@Smokey_Bear 'Only thing stopping that from growing quicker is battery tech'
That's the whole point of looking at hydrogen or synth fuels that BEV has some very serious issues when scaled up. Suitable battery technology, sourcing rare materials, recycling and the final one having sufficient recharging capacity, (think grid that's powered from renewables/storage 100% of the time.

As you say money is being poured in, but not totally convinced it will be enough, and for long medium/distance aviation/shipping even harder, alternatives are still on the cards, and some a betting higher on it such as the Japanese. Still too early to rule anything out.

Perhaps so much emphasis is on BEV is due to politicians and Greens not understanding the issues - won't be the first time!
WONKY KLERKY
Eeeeeee.
The things yer can do with an oil pump!
Fred Lanchester would be proud of you!
Captain Danger
A few notes on the article and numbers
"Air is drawn in via carburation or fuel injection" Really? Air is drawing in through fuel injection?
"explosive compression" seems a like a contradictory set of terms.
.002-.004 is not difficult to achieve but I do not know how hey account for thermal expansion. Coatings or not the material will heat up and expand.
perhaps these are the tolerances once the system is up to operating temperature
400 hp and 500 ft/lbs and 25000 RPM ,, those numbers cannot coexist.
400 hp at 25,000 PRM = 84 ft lbs
400 hp and 500 ft lbs = 4200 RPM
500 ft lbs and 25000 rpm = 2380 HP
Also I hate to see a surface plate mistreated like shown in the photos.
The author has a right to be skeptical.
paul314
If it idles at 1000 rpm and redlines at 25,000-plus with enormous torque, it's going to need really nice gear train to bring that down to usable revs without throwing the efficiency away again. Perhaps use it to power a generator and drive the wheels with electrics?
Expanded Viewpoint
One of my fondest wishes, is that I could have just one tenth of a percent of the funds that are wasted on boondoggles like this! I could live like a king for the rest of my life on that! Hydrogen, as a fuel, is a complete waste, because the cost of obtaining and transporting it far outweighs any dreamed of benefits! Then when you wake up and get into the reality of the matter, it is at least an order of magnitude less efficient, probably two.
The batteries for the EV market are so bad in the pollution reduction department, that with a projected ten year useful life (that is if they don't explode and burn everything nearby to a crisp!), the first seven years are spent just trying to break even! And if the car gets damaged at all, the insurance companies immediately move in to write them off so they can remove that tremendous amount of liability from their books, thus you are left with that white elephant made of Lithium and Cobalt, and all of the pollution debit that was generated to make it. In other words, you don't get those seven years of use to get to the break even point, it's all spent for nothing after that.
mfware
With the rev-up of BEV, we are seeing more of these silly "new" ICE engines. These people want us to believe that they have found a way to violate the laws of thermodynamics and chemistry. They don't explicitly say this but it is the only way that what they say can be true. A high efficiency thermal engine must necessarily run at very high temperature. It is called the Carnot cycle. A high temperature engine that uses air as its source of oxygen will necessarily generate massive quantities of NOx. This is a violation of law. There have been mandates to reduce NOx emissions going back to the 1960s.

The takeaway message is that these magically high-efficiency thermal engines sound more like scams than anything else.
The Doubter
Expanded Viewpoint, you're right. BEV technology is going to be a huge waste if sodium batteries do not come along. Already owners are selling EVs due to low actual ranges and charging anxiety.
Load More