Transport

Canada to build a 185-mph inter-city rail network

Canada to build a 185-mph inter-city rail network
Canada's 185-mph Alto rail service will cover more than 600 miles, and travel between Toronto and Montreal in 3 hours
Canada's 185-mph Alto rail service will cover more than 600 miles, and travel between Toronto and Montreal in 3 hours
View 2 Images
Canada's 185-mph Alto rail service will cover more than 600 miles, and travel between Toronto and Montreal in 3 hours
1/2
Canada's 185-mph Alto rail service will cover more than 600 miles, and travel between Toronto and Montreal in 3 hours
The high-speed rail project is quite a while away, with the current co-development phase set to take 5-6 years before construction can begin
2/2
The high-speed rail project is quite a while away, with the current co-development phase set to take 5-6 years before construction can begin

Canada is set to begin work on a high-speed inter-city rail network – the largest infrastructure project in the country's history. Spanning 621 miles (1,000 km), its lines will help commuters travel between Toronto and Montréal – the two biggest cities in Canada – within three hours, or half the time it would usually take. The trains will go from Toronto to Quebec City, also stopping in Peterborough, Ottawa, Laval and Trois-Rivières.

The rail service, named Alto, will feature fully electric trains capable of speeds up to 185 mph (300 km/h) running on dedicated electrified tracks. According to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's office, this will tackle the challenges of low-frequency rides and delayed trains that passengers currently face on the existing rail service, which runs on tracks owned by freight rail.

Alto - Shaping Canada’s Future with a High-Speed Train

The new rail network will serve 18 million people – nearly half of Canada's population – across the Toronto-Quebec City corridor. It's expected to serve 13 times more passengers annually than the current service.

Transport Minister Anita Anand said that today’s announcement marks the end of phase one, and the beginning of phase two – the co-development phase. This will see Alto (a state-owned Crown corporation that shares the name of the rail service) and a transport infrastructure consortium called Cadence collaborate on track design, station placement, regulatory work, and consultations with Indigenous groups.

The high-speed rail project is quite a while away, with the current co-development phase set to take 5-6 years before construction can begin
The high-speed rail project is quite a while away, with the current co-development phase set to take 5-6 years before construction can begin

This will likely take about five to six years, and construction will begin only once this is completed. So, yeah, passengers will be waiting a while for their ride.

The co-development phase itself will cost about CA$3.9 billion (US$2.7 billion) over six years, and that's in addition to the CA$372 million (US$261 million) apportioned towards this project in last year's budget.

While it looks like Canada's got its ducks in a row, it remains to be seen if the government, under the country's next prime minister, will take the rail project forward once Prime Minister Trudeau is out of office. He resigned in January under pressure from the Liberal Party that he currently leads. Trudeau will stay on only until the party chooses a new leader. What's more, federal elections are also scheduled for later this year, so there could be quite a shake-up facing the rail project.

If Canada pulls this off, it will join the list of countries that have fast trains, including China, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Italy, and the UK. Japan was the first to build a high-speed rail service all the way back in 1964, while China has the world's largest network with 27,960 miles (45,000 km) of tracks nationwide.

Source: Prime Minister of Canada

3 comments
3 comments
Richard Ireland
This arterial route's been bantered about for decades. Just so much better common sense than protocol prone over officiated airports. Plus the time is nigh for critical mass. So many frequent passengers so often train travel is the only wise choice left. Dedicated passenger rail is good, not entirely convinced electrified track the best tech sadly. Toronto or Montreal breaking new records for most snowfall. Battery drive train travel where those electrons stay warm is likely best. Even MAG Lev might be problematic in the snow belt of Canada. Politically speaking the will power of governing party is more crucial than it ought to be. Obviously any party could and should justify this line, long past due. I hope for Ontario and Quebec's sake this gets the greenlight from any election outcome. That necessary for economic growth, unquestionably!
David Reilly
This would be a wonderful addition to what is a pretty poor rail service in this corridor. Battery powered locomotives haven't yet been developed to propel a 200 plus kph loco over such a distanc,e, but perhaps by the time the line is ready to operate they might. Overhead power systems would still be the best environmentally and to achieve the desired speeds, although that infrastructure is expensive. The Swiss have very little high speed trackwork, preferring to service reliable and punctual local rail transport, Obviously Canada's huge land mass will mean any rail investment will focus on urban concentrations. Ontario once had a fairly dense local network, abandoned in favour of the car of course. Perhaps more thought should be given to city networks linking directly into trans continental services; just a thought.. Since the country is economically unsound at this moment in time, I can't see the To/Quebec route happening in my lifetime.
Uncle Anonymous
With so many special interest groups (green peace, first nations, each municipality, and the two provinces) each demanding their say and government leaders at all levels who make decisions via polling, and the public demanding a say about something they know nothing about, trying to get mega projects done in Canada like this is wishful thinking. If you look at the list of regulatory hoops, each taking between six months to a year, it's around a decade before a shovel even breaks ground. Then there are the issues of construction delays and cost over runs and the ever present special interest groups demanding changes because the fill in the blank habitat will be disturbed, or this part of the proposed line has a religious status, or some other nonsense. So, forgive me for having my doubts that this project will happen.