Transport

Fuel-cell train travels more than 1,700 miles on one tank of hydrogen

Fuel-cell train travels more than 1,700 miles on one tank of hydrogen
As testing in the US nears completion, Stadler's Flirt H2 passenger train has taken to the track to set a distance record of 2,803 km on a single tank of hydrogen
As testing in the US nears completion, Stadler's Flirt H2 passenger train has taken to the track to set a distance record of 2,803 km on a single tank of hydrogen
View 1 Image
As testing in the US nears completion, Stadler's Flirt H2 passenger train has taken to the track to set a distance record of 2,803 km on a single tank of hydrogen
1/1
As testing in the US nears completion, Stadler's Flirt H2 passenger train has taken to the track to set a distance record of 2,803 km on a single tank of hydrogen

A hydrogen fuel-cell passenger train developed by Swiss rail vehicle maker Stadler Rail has achieved a new Guinness World Record, traveling for almost two days around the clock for a distance of 1,741.7 miles.

Efforts to clean up dirty trains are already well underway, with heavy investment in electrifying networks around the world as well as rolling out battery-electric locomotives such as the FLXDrive, the Blues train and the Flirt Akku.

That last example is made by Stadler Rail AG, and managed to achieve a Guinness World Record in 2021 for the longest per-charge battery-only journey of 224 km (~140 miles), on a route between Berlin and Warnemünde during a freezing local winter – not bad for a train that was designed with an operational per-charge range of 80 km.

Not all rail networks can support electrification and that battery range just won't be enough for long-haul transportation of goods or people. That's where hydrogen could come in, making extended travel possible and only emitting steam and water.

Stadler first introduced its Flirt H2 passenger model at InnoTrans 2022 in Berlin, and began testing in Switzerland. It's designed to replace diesel-powered trains on non-electrified or partially electrified networks, and features two motor-driven end cars with a hydrogen tank and fuel cells inbetween. The fuel cells feed energy to an onboard battery, which powers the electric drive.

Originally built for California's San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, it's reported top speed is 127 km/h (79 mph) and it has a range of 460 km (286 miles) per refueling stop. However, that range figure has just been blown out of the park at the ENSCO test circuit in Pueblo, Colorado, to get Stadler into the record books again.

On the evening of March 20, the Flirt H2 set off on its first lap of the track. Engineers then took it in turns to man the controls for more than 46 hours, after which the train came to a stop having clocked up 2,803 km (1741.7 miles) on a single tank of hydrogen.

This translates into the world record for the "longest distance traveled by a hydrogen-powered passenger train without refueling or recharging." What we don't have is the speed average, the capacity of the fuel-cell system (though Hydrogen Insight reports that the SBCTA model features "12 fuel cells at 100 kW each"), or whether green hydrogen was used as the fuel source, but it's a significant milestone nonetheless.

"This world record establishes the ideal performance range of our hydrogen version of the best-selling Flirt Electric Multiple Unit, the Flirt H2," said Stadler's Dr. Ansgar Brockmeyer. "This is a monumental achievement from our entire team and we are very proud to hold another record title."

In addition to confirmed orders in California, Stadler has revealed that two Italian rail operators have signed contracts for the supply of 15 hydrogen-powered trains between them. Footage from the distance record can be seen below.

Stadler’s FLIRT H2 achieves Guinness World Records title

Source: Stadler Rail

10 comments
10 comments
Jim B
It's got to be far cheaper to string up overhead power cables. Fuel cells in trucks and cars can make sense, this not so much.
byrneheart
Transmission loss over such a long distance would be a significant reason to have onboard energy generation rather than overhead power cables
Dave Holland
The potential for this looks very strong (despite Jim B’s comment, which is perhaps relevant to commuter rail rather than long hall, at least from my Australian perspective).
I assume “more than 46 hours” is not intended to be misleading so let’s say the average speed was 56km/hr (2,800km/50hrs) - pretty damn considering the goal of setting a distance/time record.
Some information about fuel cell capacity would be interesting, as would the amount of H2 storage capacity (and how it was stored - compressed or liquid?).
The path from fuel cell to electric drive via battery is also interesting. Maybe this is a pragmatic approach (this is after all effectively a prototype) that may be improved by avoiding/reducing round trip storage losses as the technology matures?
Spud Murphy
Well, that many miles over almost 2 days is an average speed of around 60km/h, not exactly high for a typical train. You can make anything hypermile if you travel slowly enough...
michael_dowling
No,Jim B,fuel cells in cars does not make sense. Otherwise,you would see millions of them on the road vying with battery cars for dominance. The difference is that there are no H2 fueling stations covering the country,at an average cost of 1 million each. Do you realize the number of fuel cell stations that would entail? Who would pick up the tab for building them,with almost no fuel cell cars out there? For long-haul trucks and trains,it is a different matter,as you would need H2 refueling stations only along the usual trucking routes,paid for by the trucking companies.
Expanded Viewpoint
Eh, it's just another money pit boondoggle. From where, pray tell, does the electricity come from to split up water into Hydrogen and Oxygen? Oh, that's right, you just go down to the nearest Wally World store and buy it off the shelf, right? And WW gets it real cheap by having people pedal bicycles all day long, correct?
Expanded Viewpoint
And another thing, this was just one power head with no real load on it, how will it fair going up the Cajon grade in notch 8? How many of these units will it take to replace just one Diesel electric locomotive? Methinks the Emperor is losing some of his clothes now, just disappearing into thin air!
christopher
Pity they didn't mention the other world-record they achieved in this same run: "largest greenhouse gas emissions ever produced by a passenger train" (because that hydrogen was derived from fossil fuels; that's a 60% conversion efficiency - and that's before it's fed into the fuel cells, which typically run at 40% efficiency)
ANTIcarrot
@Dave Holland - This is a passenger train, and the power system and tankage is scaled to that. Looking at various companies, you could probably fit~4MW of electrical capacity into a power car, though you might need a seperate 'bunker' for the fuel itself. You'd need about ~4 tons/56m^3 of hydrogen to run it at full power all day. A 60 ft cryo tanker rail car carries 111m^23, and would run it for just shy of 2 days.
Your millage may vary on how practical this is for a given freight service.
Ranscapture
Also, trains typically make stops, this train was cruising. If it had to make stops and accelerate again it’s be less, but still an excellent distance