Transport

Report says plug-in hybrids are almost as polluting as gas-powered cars

Report says plug-in hybrids are almost as polluting as gas-powered cars
PHEVs sound like much greener alternatives to gas-guzzling ICE vehicles, but they reportedly emit just 19% less CO2 than regular cars
PHEVs sound like much greener alternatives to gas-guzzling ICE vehicles, but they reportedly emit just 19% less CO2 than regular cars
View 3 Images
PHEVs sound like much greener alternatives to gas-guzzling ICE vehicles, but they reportedly emit just 19% less CO2 than regular cars
1/3
PHEVs sound like much greener alternatives to gas-guzzling ICE vehicles, but they reportedly emit just 19% less CO2 than regular cars
The report looked at data from 800,000 PHEVs, including those from major brands, and found major discrepancies between their WLTP emissions and real-world emissions
2/3
The report looked at data from 800,000 PHEVs, including those from major brands, and found major discrepancies between their WLTP emissions and real-world emissions
The gap between real-world and official emissions for PHEVs grew year-on-year between 2021-2023
3/3
The gap between real-world and official emissions for PHEVs grew year-on-year between 2021-2023
View gallery - 3 images

A climate-focused report out of Europe throws serious shade at plug-in hybrid electric (PHEV) cars, pointing out that they emit nearly as much carbon dioxide emissions as combustion engine-powered vehicles. In fact, it highlights how real-world emissions from supposedly greener PHEVs has increased over the years above officially recorded figures to nearly five times. Yikes!

The findings come from the European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), a clutch of non-government organizations focused on sustainable transport policy across the continent. The report has been published ahead of a review of automotive CO2 emission standards, which would see Europe continue to sell plug-in hybrid electric vehicles beyond 2035, when they're set to be phased out in order to meet EU climate targets.

That's bad news for automakers and people who were hoping to reduce their carbon footprint somewhat by opting for a plug-in hybrid – a type of car that can be charged up to do short commutes about 50 miles (80 km) relying just on the battery, while the gas engine takes over for longer trips.

T&E explains that this unraveling is because of a major discrepancy in PHEV emissions figures from Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP) figures – a global standard for determining the levels of pollutants from cars – and real-world data that the collective gathered from more than 800,000 PHEVs registered between 2021 and 2023.

The gap between real-world and official emissions for PHEVs grew year-on-year between 2021-2023
The gap between real-world and official emissions for PHEVs grew year-on-year between 2021-2023

For PHEV models registered in 2023, the real-world CO₂ emissions were nearly five times as high as the official emissions. This gap has grown from a factor of 3.5 times in 2021 to 4.9 times in 2023, based on data from on-board fuel consumption meters (OBFCM). And that's just 19% less emissions than you'd see with an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle, compared to claimed WLTP differences of 75% less emissions.

According to T&E, the disparity between official (WLTP) and real-world PHEV emissions comes down to flawed assumptions regarding driving mode usage, and design limitations that force a car's combustion engine to engage frequently. Essentially, WLTP relies on fixed, overly optimistic assumptions about driver behavior, and how that plays out in terms of the share of driving done in emission-free electric mode.

There's also the question of Utility Factor (UF) overestimation: UF refers to the proportion of total driving that is powered by electricity. T&E says that official UF calculations assume that 84% of driving was all-electric over 2021–2023, while real-world data shows this share to be only 27%.

The WLTP is also said to have significantly underestimated the emissions that occur even when the PHEV is operating in what's known as Charge-Depleting mode (CD), where the car primarily runs on electricity from the battery, and gets a power boost from the ICE for accelerating quickly or climbing a slope. The report says the ICE assist causes emissions nearly nine times as high as official estimates.

Vehicle design also plays a role in making PHEVs suck for the environment. They can be heavier, and have low electric motor-to-engine power ratios – which combine to result in elevated emissions in Charge Sustaining mode (where the vehicle is mainly propelled by the ICE and assisted by the electric motor; recuperated energy keeps the battery at a steady rate of charge).

The report looked at data from 800,000 PHEVs, including those from major brands, and found major discrepancies between their WLTP emissions and real-world emissions
The report looked at data from 800,000 PHEVs, including those from major brands, and found major discrepancies between their WLTP emissions and real-world emissions

What's more, the lack of convenient charging infrastructure along with the lack of fast-charging capabilities on most PHEVs mean that people simply aren't charging their cars all that often. Instead, they're mostly relying on the cars' large fuel tanks.

Those are fighting words in the hybrid world. T&E also estimates things aren't going to improve much with PHEVs on these fronts in the years to come, and all the extra ICE driving that hasn't been accounted for is actually costing drivers more in fuel costs than they expect when they buy a plug-in hybrid.

It remains to be seen if this report will shake policymakers in Europe awake, and if that'll have knock-on effects on PHEV sales in the region and elsewhere around the world over the coming years. Until then, the authors of the report have some suggestions to help bolster EU emission standards and help the transition to zero-emission mobility along.

The big one is to maintain the 2030–2035 car CO2 targets in the upcoming regulatory review, and to disallow any derogation for hybrids after 2035. The report notes this is critical to prevent significant climate-harmful emissions.

It also suggests tackling UF correction errors that may skew data in favor of gas-guzzling PHEVs over the next few years. Lastly, building policies and incentives to increase the adoption of all-electric cars could help skip the PHEV circus altogether.

The full report has a lot more details to wrap your head around, and it's pretty readable. Find it on T&E's site.

Source: European Federation for Transport and Environment

View gallery - 3 images
4 comments
4 comments
jsopr
"There's also the question of Utility Factor (UF) overestimation: UF refers to the proportion of total driving that is powered by electricity. T&E says that official UF calculations assume that 84% of driving was all-electric over 2021–2023, while real-world data shows this share to be only 27%. The WLTP is also said to have significantly underestimated the emissions that occur even when the PHEV is operating in what's known as Charge-Depleting mode (CD), where the car primarily runs on electricity from the battery, and gets a power boost from the ICE for accelerating quickly or climbing a slope. The report says the ICE assist causes emissions nearly nine times as high as official estimates."
The report does not make it at all clear, but these two points appear to be the same thing: the reason PHEV's have a lower electric-only percentage is because the engine turns on during acceleration. However, they fail to note that many PHEVs are 100% electric even when accelerating, such as the old Volt. So for this subset of PHEVs, the electric-only percentage should be fairly close to what is expected. I suspect they downplay that subset because the organization really wants to get rid of ICE altogether and switch 100% to BEV.
vince
Most of these articles do not take into account that 95 percent of the hybrids are a joke with too small an electric motor to handle the power requirements on freeways and so most buyers get disenchanted and stop plugging them in as its a waste of time. There are Only 3 hybrids that are an exception. The Toyota Prius Prime and the Toyita Rav4 Prime both with about 40 miles of EV range and electric motors capable of pushing the car to 90 mph with electric-only power. Also the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV AWC is another valid PHEV with 38 miles of EV range which can 85 mph in EV only mode. There are also a few Volvos and europeans cars that also work well as a PHEV All the other plug ins with 16 to 25 miles of range and 22 to 40 hp electric motors are a joke and just a gimmic to attract sells. Ill never forget testing the Jeep plug in with its pathetic electric motor having only about 25 hp and when I tried to accelerate on the on-ramps it would always kick in gas motor and would not maintain even 55 mph on highway because anything over 40 mph required a completely flat grade or the gas motor would kick in. Driving it around town on flat grade you had to acelerate 0 to 30 in about a minute to prevent the gas motor from kicking in. That's s joke. Not even gfeat great grandmas accelerate that slowly. These small electric motor PHEVS are an insult to Americans intelligence.
Spud Murphy
EV Proponents have argued for years that PHEVs should not be considered EVs as they are mostly driven as hybrids and are rarely plugged in. The utility factor numbers here now support that position, and it's about time PHEVs were phased out as the polluting fossil fuel burners that they actually are...
philippeholthuizen
So its basically another Diesel-Gate?