Quantum Computing

Quantum computers inch closer to reality thanks to entangled qubits in silicon

View 4 Images
UNSW scientists have for the first time created two entangled qubits in silicon with record fidelity, paving the way for reliable, massively scalable quantum computers
Tony Melov/UNSW
The advance uses the nucleus and electron of a phosphorus atom as the two entangled qubits
Tony Melov/UNSW
UNSW scientists have for the first time created two entangled qubits in silicon with record fidelity, paving the way for reliable, massively scalable quantum computers
Tony Melov/UNSW
Project leader Andrea Morello (left) and lead authors Stephanie Simmons (center) and Juan Pablo Dehollain (right) and in the UNSW laboratory where the experiments were performed
Paul Henderson-Kelly/UNSW
False-color electron microscope image of the silicon nanoelectronic device which contains the phosphorus atom used for the demonstration of quantum entanglement
UNSW
View gallery - 4 images

Practical quantum computers are still years away, but lately the pace of research seems to have picked up. After building the basic blocks of a quantum computer in silicon and storing quantum information for up to 30 seconds, scientists at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) have now violated a principle of classical physics to demo for the first time a pair of entangled, high-fidelity quantum bits (qubits) in silicon. The advance could help unleash the power of a new kind of computation that would affect everything from data cryptography to drug design, overnight deliveries and subatomic particle experiments.

A mathematical relationship known as Bell's inequality places a limit on how strongly two particles can correlate without violating two intuitive principles that govern classical physics – locality, meaning what happens in one place can only be influenced by nearby objects; and realism, meaning physical objects exist whether or not they are observed.

But when two quantum particles commune, or entangle, their correlation can be strong enough to break this principle, giving rise to what Einstein famously dismissed as spooky action at a distance. While it is possible to achieve entanglement without violating the inequality, in the context of quantum computing a violation is desirable as it means qubit operations are more reliable and have access to more "spooky" – and useful – behavior for faster number-crunching.

Professor Andrea Morello and team have now, for the first time, demonstrated a violation of Bell's inequality in silicon, paving the way for quantum computers that are reliable and highly scalable.

False-color electron microscope image of the silicon nanoelectronic device which contains the phosphorus atom used for the demonstration of quantum entanglement
UNSW

To achieve this, the scientists used the electron and nuclear spins of a phosphorus atom in a silicon-28 (a common isotope of silicon) substrate as qubits. By doing so, they were able to produce with high fidelity all of the four possible entangled states between those two qubits.

Vital to this advance was achieving a very strong correlation between the two quantum bits. This correlation is an important metric, as it directly affects the fidelity of quantum operations. On a scale where (according to Bell's principle) correlation between classical particles can't exceed two and the maximum possible figure for entangled particles is slightly below 2.83, Morello's team managed a record, near-ideal 2.70, which translates to a very high fidelity of 96 to 97 percent.

"When you look at what it takes to prepare and acquire the measurements on entangled states, you find that even the slightest imperfection, at any stage of the experiment, will make the Bell number drop very quickly," Morello told Gizmag. "In a sense, the Bell test is a single-figure qualifier of how perfect the whole experiment is, and it's extremely unforgiving. Here we have shown that we have some of the very best qubits in the world and we are able to handle them with near-perfect accuracy."

The advance uses the nucleus and electron of a phosphorus atom as the two entangled qubits
Tony Melov/UNSW

This is a promising result especially when combined with the fact that the device was built in silicon, fabricated with standard industry processes that lend themselves to miniaturization and scaling up the number of qubits. (Like similar quantum computers, this device still needs to operate at temperatures near absolute zero and under a strong magnetic field; but since quantum computers are not meant to replace traditional computers altogether, this should not be a big issue.)

Future experiments will explore how nuclear spins can help build logic gates between electron qubits. Then, the focus will shift to building longer-lived memory and creating the right architectures to build error-proof quantum computers that make use of many more entangled qubits.

"This particular advance does not scale very much, because it was done using the electron and the nucleus of the same atom," Morello told us. "That's why our next step is to entangle two different atoms.

"Still, this is important because we have learned a lot about how to make the process of writing quantum information near-perfect. Once you have many atoms, you can entangle them pairwise, or you can entangle them in large bunches. The more spins you entangle all together, the more powerful your computer code becomes."

Project leader Andrea Morello (left) and lead authors Stephanie Simmons (center) and Juan Pablo Dehollain (right) and in the UNSW laboratory where the experiments were performed
Paul Henderson-Kelly/UNSW

Part of the team's plans is also to work on demonstrating a new method to entangle two atoms at very large distances of up to 1 cm (0.4 in).

"We have very clear goals to make silicon [quantum computers] with [more than] 10 qubits within 4-5 years," revealed Morello. "Beyond that point, it will depend on how much we can integrate our qubits with standard industry manufacturing processes. Here is where we expect that having done all this work in silicon will give us a huge advantage over the competitors."

The work appears in today's edition of the journal Nature Nanotechnology. The researchers further explain their work in the video below.

Source: UNSW

View gallery - 4 images
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
4 comments
CharlieSeattle
Why is this concept expressed in 2D using only the x and y axis?
10+x X 10+y = 100 10+x X 10-y = 100 10-x X 10+y = 100 10-x X 10-y = 100 __________________ 2D Area Size = 400
Atoms are round three dimensional objects, not flat. Can there be an Z axis alignment? See Cartesian coordinate system.
http://biotelemetrica.pbworks.com/f/1229563756/xyzAxis.gif
Atoms can be stacked in a cube. Expounding on the 3D concept. There are 8 quadrants in a Cartesian coordinate system.
10+x X 10+y x 10+z = 1000 10+x X 10+y x 10-z = 1000
10+x X 10-y x 10+z = 1000 10+x X 10-y x 10-z = 1000
10-x X 10+y x 10+z = 1000 10-x X 10+y x 10-z = 1000
10-x X 10-y x 10+z = 1000 10-x X 10-y x 10-z = 1000 _________________________ (3D) Volume Size = 8000
Please post an reply.
Gary Villette
D-Wave is already building and selling quantum computers: http://www.dwavesys.com/press-releases/los-alamos-national-laboratory-orders-1000-qubit-d-wave-2x-quantum-computer
BlaineMiller
Yes, D-Wave has quantum computers, but not universal quantum computers. Not the type you put in silicon and control the movement of the quibits yourself.
UhuruImane
Can quantum physics computers like artificial intelligence simulators transport thoughts energy into thoughts manipulating humans genes or genomes if so can those compounds be use as court evidence or to alter (en-vi(virtual)roments) or universe. Can those same particles be used halt time,prevent disease at molecular level plus cure racism or teleport planets or objects at push of button.like universe knows of every situation before hand through centuries yet have those who've teleported messed up possibility of solving genocide or conflicts in universe on every planet.