Health & Wellbeing

Antibiotic-free method to protect animals from common infections

The antibiotic alternative could reduce the heavy use of antibiotics in agriculture
The antibiotic alternative could reduce the heavy use of antibiotics in agriculture
View 1 Image
The antibiotic alternative could reduce the heavy use of antibiotics in agriculture
1/1
The antibiotic alternative could reduce the heavy use of antibiotics in agriculture

A herd of cattle or a flock of chickens may appear very bucolic, but they're actually ground zero for an ongoing arms race between scientists and disease-causing bacteria. Antibiotics have been a major weapon in the fight against animal infection, but they've also sparked evolutionary forces that create drug-resistant bacteria that render those very antibiotics ineffective, posing a major risk to animals and humans alike. Now a University of Wisconsin-Madison team is developing a method of fighting a major group of animal infections without antibiotics.

Antibiotics have been a tremendous boon to animal husbandry as they prevent losses of livestock from once common infections that could bankrupt farmers and even cripple national economies. Small wonder that 80 percent of antibiotics in the United States are used on farm animals to protect against disease and promote growth. However, this has proved to be a double-edged sword because such heavy use kicked off an evolutionary arms race against these medicines. It's one reason why some antibiotics have become less effective against certain resistant strains and why doctors have kept some antibiotics in reserve against future needs.

The problem is how antibiotics work. Tailored to interfere with the biochemical mechanisms of microbes and parasites, they disrupt enzymes or attack the membranes of bacteria. It's effective, but it's also exactly the sort of thing that kicks natural selection into top gear; producing a new super germ, which can spread to other farms and the general population, but does not respond to antibiotics.

A team led by Mark Cook, a professor of animal sciences, attacked this problem by turning it around. According to Cook, microbes evolve so quickly, an antibiotics arms race is a losing proposition, so instead of going after the microbes, Cook's team addressed an ancient weakness in the animals that the microbes exploit. Normally, an animal's immune system can see off an infection, but a surprisingly diverse group of organisms, including bacteria, single- and multi-celled parasites, protozoa, and some viruses produce a chemical known as macrophage Migratory Inhibition Factor (MIF). This triggers an "off switch" in the animal's immune system called Interleukin 10 (IL-10), which allows the pathogen to slip by and attack without triggering a counterattack.

Cook's approach was to create a vaccine by introducing an antibody to IL-10 in hens' eggs, which could then be introduced into animal feed. According to the UW-Madison team, the antibody works in the gastrointestinal tract and marks the first time this kind of immune system manipulation has been used in such an area.

The largest experiment included 300,000 chickens, which became fully immune to coccidiosis, a major farm animal infection that takes hold inside the intestine. Another test where beef steers were fed the antibodies for two weeks cut the rate of bovine respiratory disease in half, while newborn dairy calves treated for 10 days showed similar results.

Another UW-Madison professor of animal science, Dan Schaefer, plans a larger bovine trial with other universities in the near future. Meanwhile, one of the four patents filed by Cook and his team has just been granted and they are turning the research into a commercial enterprise called Ab E Discovery LLC.

"We are not focused on the pathogens," says Cook. "We are focused on what they are trying to do to the immune system. We are getting encouraging data from dairy and beef. We have conducted experiments involving 300,000 chickens in commercial farms, half receiving the product. We know it works. The market is interested, and now it's a matter of making a product."

Source: University of Wisconsin-Madison

4 comments
Fretting Freddy the Ferret pressing the Fret
Good news. Over-use of antibiotics on cattle is sadly too common, and poses a significant risk to animal and human health alike.
ringo the Baptist
This very worrying (Not because alternatives to antibiotics are being looked into.) Worrying because the understanding of what is going on with antibiotics looks hopelessly misguided. The ENFORCED assumption (readers are not supposed to think) is that new, nasty bugs are rapidly evolving is preventing people from taking note of what COULD very well really be happening… There seems to be great arrogance when it comes to what is THOUGHT to be happening when messing with antibiotics and the claims of what is going on. What if we still have an awful lot to learn? What if the widespread use of antibiotics on plants and animals can be compared to working on 80-year-old, Swiss timekeeping masterpiece using a large screwdriver and a crowbar? (I am probably not too far off in this analogy) We are learning all the time how many of the bugs that share our bodies are absolutely necessary for us to live – the symbiotic nature of our existence is something we are keenly aware of. What if a great many of the things that we have “blown away” using antibiotics were only a problem to us because something ELSE had gone wrong? What if blowing away bits of biology provides only temporary relief for reasons that we do not yet understand – and that we cannot see the nasty mess that we are unwittingly creating? What if treating our problems with antibiotics is (in the long term) is actually blowing away stuff that is absolutely vital for the well-being of life on our planet? What if we have being destroying biological moving parts of a complicated arrangement that were fulfilling important rolls? Something that we have no way of fixing after we have broken it? How about looking at this thing another way: What if blasting away with antibiotics is causing big SHIFTS in the “bug” populations, causing some “bugs” (that were once at undetectable levels) to rapidly increase in numbers – appearing for all intents and purposes as if they have “come into existence” for the first time?
Stewart Mitchell
Raising animals in a barn is a delusional, unhealthy and expensive. It would be more practical , sometimes , grow meat in a warmer location for the winter. In the future, air travel will be cheaper. Raising free range has been demonstrated to be more economical..
Flashcactus
Very interesting article.