Study may explain how artificial sweeteners actually make you gain weight

Study may explain how artifici...
A new study could point to one of the mechanisms that show how artificial sweeteners, like those used in sugar-free soda, promote fat accumulation
A new study could point to one of the mechanisms that show how artificial sweeteners, like those used in sugar-free soda, promote fat accumulation
View 1 Image
A new study could point to one of the mechanisms that show how artificial sweeteners, like those used in sugar-free soda, promote fat accumulation
A new study could point to one of the mechanisms that show how artificial sweeteners, like those used in sugar-free soda, promote fat accumulation

Do artificial sweeteners make you gain weight? This question has been hotly debated by scientists for decades with study after study showing strange correlations between a tendency to obesity and consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. A new study could have uncovered one of the biological mechanisms behind this counter-intuitive phenomenon.

Ever since the introduction of modern artificial sweeteners to our shelves in the 1980s there has been debate around their safety and ultimate efficacy as a weight-loss agent. Several large scale studies over the past 30 years have displayed positive correlations between weight gain and artificial sweetener use.

While these studies did not imply a direct cause and effect, many researchers tried to come up with ways to explain the seemingly anomalous results. After all, why would consumption of lower-calorie foodstuffs result in weight gain? It didn't really make rational sense, leading to behavioral explanations being bandied about suggesting those who consumed artificial sweeteners over-compensated their calorie consumption elsewhere.

Other explanations speculated that artificial sweeteners confused the body's regular metabolic processes by being sweet but lacking calories. When your body doesn't get the caloric follow up from foods that taste sweet it could interfere with the normal hunger signals. This potentially resulted in low-calorie sweeteners making you more hungry than you would be otherwise.

All these explanations still relied on the individual ultimately not moderating their overall food intake, be it through miscalculation of caloric intake or uncontrollable hunger signals. But a new study from a team at George Washington University may be finally homing in on a biological reason that could explain why artificial sweeteners tend to correlate with weight gain.

The research concentrated on the artificial sweetener sucralose (used in Splenda, Zerocal, Sukrana, SucraPlus, Candys, Cukren, and Nevella), and tested its effects directly on stem cells taken from human fat tissue. When the cells were exposed to a concentration of sucralose equivalent to that of someone drinking four cans of diet soda a day, an increased accumulation of fat droplets in the cells was observed, as was a higher expression of genes that are seen to be markers of inflammation and fat production.

The next experiment compared samples of abdominal fat from subjects who consumed low-calorie sweeteners to subjects who did not. In the fat biopsy samples of those who consumed low-calorie sweeteners they saw evidence of increased glucose transport into cells.

The team also noted a 2.5-fold higher expression of sweet-taste receptors in the fat tissue of the subjects that consumed the sweeteners. The suspicion is that the higher expression of these sweet-taste receptors in the fat cells plays a role in allowing the increased glucose transport into the cells.

The research concludes by claiming that this metabolic dysregulation causes cellular mechanisms to produce more fat, and distressingly they saw the effects more apparent in obese subjects than those of normal weight.

"Many health-conscious individuals like to consume low-calorie sweeteners as an alternative to sugar," says the study's principle investigator, Associate Professor Sabyasachi Sen. "However, there is increasing scientific evidence that these sweeteners promote metabolic dysfunction."

The research is still in its early stages and still needs to be confirmed on a broader scale, but it could bring us closer to understanding why many studies show artificial sweeteners don't contribute to weight loss.

The research will be presented on Monday April 10th at ENDO 2017, the Endocrine Society's 99th annual meeting.

Source: The Endocrine Society

Erythritol is a good tasting natural sweetener that has almost zero calories.
I'm sorry, but the phrase "higher expression of these sweet-taste receptors in the fat cells" has got to be the most hokey description of a scientific phenomena I've heard in a long time. Really? You couldn't come up with anything more legitimate sounding than "sweet-taste receptors"? Next we'll learn that this study was sponsored by The American Sugar Alliance.
I suppose it shouldn't be surprising that, since the tongue interprets these chemicals as sugar-like, something else in the body might also interpret similarly. Further, since they taste many times sweeter than sugar, it doesn't feel entirely surprising that the other reactions are stronger than for glucose too.
Douglas Bennett Rogers
What about bad bacteria feeding on artificial sweeteners?
Douglas E Knapp
Windykites, and it will still make you fat.
I use saccharine (which has been proven to cause cancer in rats when they are given 50,000 times the normal human dose but doesn't harm humans in human dosages.) Does the "we're all gonna booat and die" theme here hold for me, too? Also, recently found a new sweetener from the Whole Earth Sweetener Company. It says "with stevia and monk fruit" on the front, but on the back, the ingredient list is: Erythritol, Fructose, Chicory Root Fiber, Stevia Leaf Extract, Monk Fruit Extract. The message is: Never judge a sweetener by its cover. They ought to be ashamed, but the company is in Chicago and probably isn't.
I don't think many people are surprised at these results. There is so much anecdotal evidence around it that it seems to be just about consensus that diet soda is nearly just as bad as regular soda it's simply a matter of not yet understanding the chemistry of why.
if it tastes good, chances are it's not so good for you. that is why jack lalanne said "if it tastes good, spit it out!"
I drink a diet drink that is very thirst quenching. It is called water. If I don't need to quench my thirst I drink tea.
It is a perversion of several laws of physics to presume that a net gain of weight can be achieved with no net increase in calories. Unless, you believe in "alternative facts."
Load More