Automotive

Mercedes claims new 'solar paint' could eliminate daily EV charging

Mercedes claims new 'solar paint' could eliminate daily EV charging
Mercedes-Benz says it's working on a solar paint job that could generate enough energy for the average LA driver's daily needs
Mercedes-Benz says it's working on a solar paint job that could generate enough energy for the average LA driver's daily needs
View 3 Images
Mercedes-Benz says it's working on a solar paint job that could generate enough energy for the average LA driver's daily needs
1/3
Mercedes-Benz says it's working on a solar paint job that could generate enough energy for the average LA driver's daily needs
The solar paint layer would live underneath the car's color paint, protecting it from the elements
2/3
The solar paint layer would live underneath the car's color paint, protecting it from the elements
The solar paint, says the company, could generate enough energy to completely obviate daily EV charging for the average LA driver
3/3
The solar paint, says the company, could generate enough energy to completely obviate daily EV charging for the average LA driver
View gallery - 3 images

Mercedes-Benz has unveiled a list of research programs and future technologies it's working on – including a "new kind of solar paint" it says could generate enough energy for up to 20,000 km (12,427 miles) of driving per year under ideal conditions.

We've seen a few companies toying with the idea of integrating solar panels into the bodywork of electric vehicles – notably the "months without charging" Lightyear 0, the 3-wheeled Aptera Solar EV, and Scania's solar-panel-covered semi-trailer.

But what if the entire painted surface of the car could capture solar energy?

Solar paint is not a new idea in and of itself; there are a few different techniques, mainly within the research space, that allow photovoltaic material to be sprayed directly onto surfaces. Painting entire cars with it, however, would be quite a leap forward – and that's what Mercedes-Benz is talking about as part of a new "Pioneering innovations for the car of the future" presentation outlining some key research programs it's working on.

The solar paint layer would live underneath the car's color paint, protecting it from the elements
The solar paint layer would live underneath the car's color paint, protecting it from the elements

Here are the key claims distilled from the Benz press release:

  • The solar paint would add just 5 micrometers (0.0002 in) of thickness and 50 g of weight per square meter (0.17 oz per square foot) to a standard paint job
  • It would operate at around 20% efficiency
  • An area of 11 sq m (118 sq ft), or roughly the painted surface of a mid-size SUV, "could produce enough energy for up to 12,000 km (7,456 miles) a year under ideal conditions" in Stuttgart, Germany
  • That annual figure would be closer to 20,000 km (12,427 miles) in LA, or 14,000 km (8,700 miles) in Beijing
  • It contains no rare earths, no silicon, no toxic or supply-limited materials
  • It's recyclable
  • It's "considerably cheaper to produce than conventional solar modules"

The company says that based on local solar intensity and its own data on daily driving habits, this solar paint could completely eliminate plug-in charging for the average EV owner in Los Angeles making their daily commute.
In the company's cloudier home of Stuttgart, where Benz drivers cover an average of 52 km (32 miles) daily, the paint would allegedly generate more like 62% of the required energy.

The solar paint, says the company, could generate enough energy to completely obviate daily EV charging for the average LA driver
The solar paint, says the company, could generate enough energy to completely obviate daily EV charging for the average LA driver

Mercedes-Benz doesn't outline exactly what the active ingredient is here, but we can take a guess. Based on the efficiency level, the thickness, the lack of rare earths and silicon, and the claimed low cost of the solar paint, we'd imagine it's probably a sprayable perovskite solution.

Perovskite has delivered higher efficiencies in the lab, and fits the rest of the profile. The chief issue over the last decade or so has been getting it to last long enough to be worthwhile, since it's proven vulnerable to water and ultraviolet light, ironically enough.

But there appear to be coatings that can make it much more robust – like the BondLynx adhesive from Canadian company XlynX, and another coating developed at Princeton University, which promises a lifespan up to 30 years. We're yet to see anything of the sort make it through to a commercial operation, even at small scale.

In the Mercedes-Benz solution, the solar coating would be applied directly to the car's body panels, with the color paint job sprayed right over the top. That'd protect the photovoltaics from grit, grime, carpark scratches, bird poop and most of the other indignities your car's paintwork endures – and the company says it's come up with a nanoparticle-based paint that'll let 94% of the solar energy through to be harvested by the solar coating underneath it.

Certainly, the idea of spray-on solar holds enormous promise – not just in EVs, but as a super-cheap way to turn large areas of roof or entire walls into energy-harvesting solar panels.

So while we're not holding our breath waiting for a solar-painted Merc to hit the showroom any time soon, we're certainly paying attention to sprayable perovskite and its enormous clean-energy potential.

Source: Mercedes-Benz

View gallery - 3 images
8 comments
8 comments
Robt
In real life, it’s all about the economics…if this is cheap to produce and also apply to a given surface with a decent lifetime, then it’s a winner
bobmeyerweb
Longevity and repairability will be important. What's involved, and what's the cost, when you need a fender replaced?
HarryTC
Maybe I missed it, but what if a “solar coated” vehicle is mostly under a carport or in a garage?
c w
Good luck dealing with those dings and scratches..
Ranscapture
@c w, ding, scratch, spark!
Uncle Anonymous
While I think this is a great idea, I do have my reservations. I suspect that having this on a vehicle would be a nightmare for insurance companies, where every little ding and scratch would increase the cost of repairs substantially. Where once the vehicle could have a dent popped out and a little touch up paint applied at a body repair shop, odds are these would have to be sent back to the factory to get the solar coating reapplied.
SteveMc
A very interesting theory but I’ll believe it when I see it. Sounds to me like seriously struggling Mercedes (all of Germany really…) is blowing the proverbial smoke where the perovskites don’t shine to encourage the market in their direction and wait with bated breath. For one, you’re not going to get anywhere near 11sq/m of full sun exposure on your average sized car, it’s more like 3-5sq/m. 11sq/m is the side of a large van. There’s other complications to consider; doors are technically individual panels, requiring expensive, very, very reliable electrical connection to the main body. Otherwise there’s high risk of fire and overall failure of the system. Strange how the glass isn’t mentioned. Can that be sprayed with the solar coating and still be transparent? At the quoted micron level it should be almost invisible and standard automotive glass is already an excellent UV barrier, 100% proof with simple, cheap coating. If the Mercedes breakthrough is so good, it should be sprayed on everything that will take it and we’ll solve the global energy crisis within a year. I genuinely hope this isn’t another fairytale promise and it works.
Daishi
I'm sure they are working on a way to remotely disable it after a few years unless you have a monthly subscription like their remote starter. They use lame excuses like "it can be started from anywhere in the world" but why would I want to enable me or anyone the ability to remote start my car from somewhere else in the world vs like, within key fob range that doesn't require a subscription? I looked at one of their cars used recently and they even found a way to remove the map and navigation from the display upon resale so the entire digital display is now just decorative and can only be used to toggle between a couple driving modes that could have been a knob. If this is what "luxury" means I prefer to avoid vehicles with too much technology that makes planned obsolescence too easy for the manufacturer. Just pairing Bluetooth is somehow annoying and broken because car companies are terrible at technology. I do NOT trust the auto industry to put solar panels on cars. It would spike repair and insurance costs and they would insist on doing all repair work themselves and you would get 2 cents/day worth of range.