Automotive

Ariel leaves Polaris choking on its dust with bio-fiber e-buggy

Ariel leaves Polaris choking on its dust with bio-fiber e-buggy
Ariel reveals a bio-composite electric Nomad
Ariel reveals a bio-composite electric Nomad
View 12 Images
Ariel reveals a bio-composite electric Nomad
1/12
Ariel reveals a bio-composite electric Nomad
Ariel explores how it can offer quick, thrilling off-roading with less of a carbon footprint
2/12
Ariel explores how it can offer quick, thrilling off-roading with less of a carbon footprint
The E-Nomad doesn't appear as rugged or capable as the original ICE Nomad, but it's designed to optimize weight, aerodynamics and carbon reduction
3/12
The E-Nomad doesn't appear as rugged or capable as the original ICE Nomad, but it's designed to optimize weight, aerodynamics and carbon reduction
The E-Nomad comes powered by a
4/12
The E-Nomad comes powered by a 281-hp electric drive
The E-Nomad features body panels made from a flax-composite said to be lighter than carbon fiber
5/12
The E-Nomad features body panels made from a flax-composite said to be lighter than carbon fiber
Gridded bio-composite ribs reinforce the body for improved structural integrity
6/12
Gridded bio-composite ribs reinforce the body for improved structural integrity
Ariel E-Nomad controls
7/12
Ariel E-Nomad controls
Ariel E-Nomad controls
8/12
Ariel E-Nomad controls
The E-Nomad charges from 20 to 80 percent in a claimed 25 minutes
9/12
The E-Nomad charges from 20 to 80 percent in a claimed 25 minutes
E-Nomad powertrain layout
10/12
E-Nomad powertrain layout
E-Nomad Pegasus battery module
11/12
E-Nomad Pegasus battery module
Ariel Nomad 2 (ICE powered)
12/12
Ariel Nomad 2 (ICE powered)
View gallery - 12 images

The new Ariel E-Nomad concept may not look quite as downright menacing and imposing as a Polaris RZR Pro R (or, for that matter, Ariel's own ICE Nomad), but it definitely throws down the gauntlet. With nearly 500 Nm (369 lb-ft) of insta-torque from its all-electric powertrain, the E-Nomad sprints from 0 to 60 mph (97 km/h) on the flats in a mere 3.4 seconds. And with its sustainable powertrain and construction, the only thing it leaves behind is agitated dust and broken egos.

Ariel may still be best known for its track-blasting Atom, the lovable grown-up's go-cart with exoskeleton and Honda turbo four, but it's been busily expanding its reach over the past decade with debuts like the original Nomad off-roader, a properly faired hybrid "hipercar," a motorcycle and even several ebikes. With the E-Nomad, it explores a potential electric future for its go-anywhere 4-wheeler series.

Ariel Nomad 2 (ICE powered)
Ariel Nomad 2 (ICE powered)

Ariel started its concept build with the second-generation Nomad it introduced in July. In place of Ford's 2.3-liter turbo, it installs an electric drive system powered by a 41-kWh 450-V battery. Output is down just a touch to 281 hp and 490 Nm, from 305 hp and 518 Nm on the turbo model, but the high-energy Rockfort Pegasus V3 battery cells and single-speed direct drive help the E-Nomad tie things up in the 0-60-mph category with that aforementioned 3.4-sec time.

The E-Nomad concept actually isn't the first electric Nomad project out there. That came way back in 2019 from automotive specialist BorgWarner, whose eDM motor features in the new rear drive system, spinning its way to 12,000 rpm.

E-Nomad powertrain layout
E-Nomad powertrain layout

The E-Nomad is limited to rear-wheel drive, but it does incorporate a limited-slip rear differential and an "off-road" mode to complement the "on-road" mark on the dial. It also offers both "sport" and "eco" drive settings to instantly adjust throttle and regenerative brake mapping accordingly.

The electric powertrain does add weight to Ariel's notoriously gaunt design, but the E-Nomad still ducks in under 1 ton with a 1,975-lb (896-kg) curb weight. Ariel explains that the energy-dense Pegasus V3 pouch cells from its partner Rockfort Engineering keep the overall battery weight below 661 lb (300 kg).

To further check weight, Ariel has teamed with Bamd Composites to mold the E-Nomad bodywork out of a sustainable fiber-resin concoction it says undercuts even carbon fiber in weight. Based around fibers sourced from Northern European flax plants, the prepeg composite comes in 9% lighter than carbon fiber while cutting an impressive 73% of CO2 emissions created during manufacturing, if we're to believe Ariel's numbers. The material is also recyclable.

The E-Nomad comes powered by a
The E-Nomad comes powered by a 281-hp electric drive

Ariel explains it was able to precisely shape the flax-composite body paneling via computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, leading to a 30% reduction in drag over the standard Nomad. With that type of improvement, we can forgive the lime-green fairings for making the rig look so much softer and less rugged than Ariel's traditional bare tubes.

Perhaps "trading dust with Polaris" would be a better characterization of the E-Nomad's capabilities. It certainly gets out of the gate more quickly than the Polaris RZR Pro R and its tested 5-sec 0-60 mph, and while Ariel hasn't provided a top speed for the concept, the standard Nomad's 130-mph+ (209-km/h+) creates loads of space with the Pro R's 90-mph (145-km/h) top mark. However, we'd definitely throw our trust behind the RZR's established pedigree, switchable 4WD, 29 inches (74 cm) of suspension travel, and biting incisor-like tires when wide-open hardpack transitions to boulder staircases and scree scrambles.

Range is anyone's game, as it looks like the small 12-gal tank and low off-road mileage of the RZR series may have trouble keeping up with the E-Nomad's advertised 150-mile (241-km) range. But is the RZR pilot carrying a jerry can or two? That'll certainly be a faster solution than about-facing back to the grid and fast-charging the E-Nomad for 25 minutes (from 20 to 80%).

So it'll come down to how far and rough the race course is.

Off-roaders may or may not ever get the chance to pit the Ariel E-Nomad against a Polaris, Can-Am or alternative 4-wheeler. Ariel is noncommittal but hopeful as to the E-Nomad's production chances.

The E-Nomad doesn't appear as rugged or capable as the original ICE Nomad, but it's designed to optimize weight, aerodynamics and carbon reduction
The E-Nomad doesn't appear as rugged or capable as the original ICE Nomad, but it's designed to optimize weight, aerodynamics and carbon reduction

"While the E-Nomad is a concept, it does show production intent for the vehicle and hints at just a small part of Ariel’s future," said Ariel's director Simon Saunders. "Once it has been through our usual grueling testing regime we could opt to add E-Nomad alongside its ICE Nomad 2 sibling, so we’ll take great interest in customer feedback on the concept car."

That feedback surely started pouring in last week, when the E-Nomad made its debut at the Cenex Vehicle Expo. Here's to hoping it was positive.

Source: Ariel

View gallery - 12 images
4 comments
4 comments
Claudio
I'm definitely not familiar with this vehicle: what are the two "antennas" for?
Rick O
They should have added an e-motor to the ICE Nomad to make it 4wd and a mild hybrid. That would be a perfect daily driver for most of the year for me. As long as it could fit on the trails, I would replace my RZR with it. As it stands I'll keep my RZR ProXP4 and the Ram I haul it with. Both of those combined probably cost me less than an e-Nomad, though I did buy the Ram used.
RichSPK
Add some doors and I'd love to commute in that!

I didn't realize the ebikes were from the same company.
Cardesignmind
I’m a little biased being previously employed by Polaris but this is a ridiculous enough comparison to be almost click-bait.
Ariel doesn’t list suspension travel for its Nomad but it’s likely not much more than 16” given it’s ground clearance (9” of ground clearance vs 16” on the Polaris) which tells me they don’t feel like bragging (they don’t even tell you how much it is after they improved it) + no rear trailing arm suspension, no 4WD (yes- WTF). Yes, maybe the RZR has a slower top speed (the RZR is factory limited by its ECU and/or clutching depending on model year) but with 29” of travel and 32” tall tires vs 29” and a-arm rear suspension (with unknown travel but again let’s say not much more than 2xs it’s ground clearance for logics sake) there’s no way it’s going to be better off-road. People might not understand how big a difference trailing arms and big travel make but just look at the apex predator of the off-road world, the Trophy Truck, and you see the highest level of development that then drives the classes below. This is also without touching on how much time Polaris spends testing its vehicles off-road that includes its passenger protection systems which are tested at automotive levels. As to price Ariel does say that most drivers spec them at about $110k but I think base price has been from $80-90k. RZR’s are expensive but not nearly in that price range. Maybe this articles title should be amended a bit. And Ariel should line up at the Baja 1000/500/400 and put the whole topic to rest. Hell I’d like to see them do a 1/2 day at Glamis with paddles on just to start. (please forgive my fan-boy stance on this topic)