Automotive

OPINION: Distracted driving - the insanity of public roads

OPINION: Distracted driving - ...
View 121 Images
1/121
2/121
3/121
4/121
5/121
6/121
7/121
8/121
9/121
10/121
The number of riders who used their left and right ear for calling seemed evenly split - even though the throttle and front brake are on the right. Go figure.
11/121
The number of riders who used their left and right ear for calling seemed evenly split - even though the throttle and front brake are on the right. Go figure.
One of the most common accessories in many asian countries is a child seat that sits between the driver and the handlebars.
12/121
One of the most common accessories in many asian countries is a child seat that sits between the driver and the handlebars.
13/121
14/121
15/121
16/121
17/121
18/121
19/121
20/121
21/121
22/121
23/121
24/121
25/121
26/121
27/121
28/121
29/121
30/121
31/121
32/121
33/121
34/121
35/121
36/121
37/121
38/121
39/121
40/121
41/121
42/121
43/121
44/121
45/121
46/121
47/121
48/121
49/121
50/121
51/121
52/121
53/121
54/121
55/121
56/121
57/121
58/121
59/121
60/121
61/121
62/121
63/121
64/121
65/121
66/121
67/121
68/121
69/121
70/121
71/121
72/121
73/121
74/121
75/121
76/121
77/121
78/121
79/121
80/121
81/121
82/121
83/121
84/121
85/121
86/121
87/121
88/121
89/121
90/121
91/121
92/121
93/121
94/121
95/121
96/121
97/121
98/121
99/121
100/121
Less than a mile from here, about half an hour before I took this pic, Graham (my traveling companion) and I witnessed one of the greatest travesties of OHS in history. A 20 foot ladder, extending maybe 8 ft front and aft on a motorcycle, sitting on the motorcylists' two shoulders with their heads poking through.
101/121
Less than a mile from here, about half an hour before I took this pic, Graham (my traveling companion) and I witnessed one of the greatest travesties of OHS in history. A 20 foot ladder, extending maybe 8 ft front and aft on a motorcycle, sitting on the motorcylists' two shoulders with their heads poking through.
102/121
103/121
104/121
105/121
106/121
107/121
108/121
109/121
110/121
A selection of innocent things that will kill you - dogs, pedestrians, bike and motorcycle riders are not necessarily this well ordered when you're on the road.
111/121
A selection of innocent things that will kill you - dogs, pedestrians, bike and motorcycle riders are not necessarily this well ordered when you're on the road.
Dream up the weirdest contraptions you could possibly imagine, and you won't go half way to reality.
112/121
Dream up the weirdest contraptions you could possibly imagine, and you won't go half way to reality.
I threw this in mainly to illustrate how many bizarre uses can be found for a motorcycle when a car is simply too expensive. It's also a case of distracting driving rather than distracted driving.
113/121
I threw this in mainly to illustrate how many bizarre uses can be found for a motorcycle when a car is simply too expensive. It's also a case of distracting driving rather than distracted driving.
The motorcycle rare fish shop.
114/121
The motorcycle rare fish shop.
I looked hard for the rider of this thing - I tried for 20 minutes to find him, but ... no luck.
115/121
I looked hard for the rider of this thing - I tried for 20 minutes to find him, but ... no luck.
The fish looked happy!
116/121
The fish looked happy!
The lowest roadgoing vehicle in the foodchain is the bicycle - seven times more likely to die than a motorcycle and roughly 20 times more likely than a car. Talking on a mobile phone increases the risk.
117/121
The lowest roadgoing vehicle in the foodchain is the bicycle - seven times more likely to die than a motorcycle and roughly 20 times more likely than a car. Talking on a mobile phone increases the risk.
Talking on a mobile phone on a motorcycle in the rain would have to be one of the most hazardous things I can think of - certainly one of the most dangerous things a normal person encounters.
118/121
Talking on a mobile phone on a motorcycle in the rain would have to be one of the most hazardous things I can think of - certainly one of the most dangerous things a normal person encounters.
Tuktuks in Laos come from a different branch of the family tree to those of other parts of Asia - they're all cut-and-shut-tf-up jobs and they all have a castor and rake of zero. I tried to find out why they all look so unnatural but ... failed.
119/121
Tuktuks in Laos come from a different branch of the family tree to those of other parts of Asia - they're all cut-and-shut-tf-up jobs and they all have a castor and rake of zero. I tried to find out why they all look so unnatural but ... failed.
Imagine finding yourself riding in the rain with an umbrella wrapped around your helmet. Maybe they make umbrella's stronger in Asia?
120/121
Imagine finding yourself riding in the rain with an umbrella wrapped around your helmet. Maybe they make umbrella's stronger in Asia?
Tuktuk in Vientiane - this thing was close to the single worst piece of roadgoing machinery I have ever been aboard - it's only saving grace was that it could only muster around 40 km/h and the driver knew its limit
121/121
Tuktuk in Vientiane - this thing was close to the single worst piece of roadgoing machinery I have ever been aboard - it's only saving grace was that it could only muster around 40 km/h and the driver knew its limit
View gallery - 121 images

The distracted driving epidemic seems to know no bounds. With global road deaths set to exceed 1.5 million human beings in 2011, almost every country in the world continues to accept the mayhem on the roads as simply the cost of doing business. Distracted driving is the hot topic of the moment with research suggesting 5,800 U.S. traffic deaths last year were tied to motorists who failed to keep their eyes on the road.

Another study claims American drivers are distracted between one-quarter and one-half of the time they spend on the road, two-thirds of drivers use a cell phone while driving, one-third used a cell phone routinely and observational studies suggest between 7% and 10% of all drivers are using a cell phone at any given time. If you think that's bad, you should see what happens in Asia.

How accountable should road users be?

Should public roads be a place where safety is sacrosanct? If you kill someone through your negligence on public roads, should you be charged with manslaughter? If your negligence or lack of reasonable care causes another life to be lived in pain, or someone's quality of life to be significantly reduced, for decades, should you be forced to compensate that person equitably? If you take another life through your chosen actions, albeit indirectly, how accountable should you be?

Much of my opinion on such matters early in life was based on the fact I rode a motorcycle, and that I was of little danger to anyone else, and I was angry about the cynical revenue raising activities of governments more intent on balancing the books (by fining people), than saving lives.

In more recent times, I have been swinging around to another viewpoint - that public roads should be a place where public safety is paramount, and anyone endangering public safety should be simply removed from the roads. Drink driving, excessive speed, dangerous driving etc should be given one extremely costly chance and after that, you forfeit your right to use them for a significant period of time.

Now, this is entirely personal opinion, and it is as much a personal essay on life on public roads as it is a photographic essay on life on roads in developing Asian countries.

A few years ago, I read new research from the University of Utah which suggested that driving while using a cell phone gave one roughly the same reactions as a person of 0.08 blood alcohol content - for quite different reasons, but the end result was the same. Remarkably, the study concluded that whether the driver was speaking on a hands-free or holding the phone, the end result was EXACTLY the same. The problem is not the holding of the phone in the car, but the driver's mind being elsewhere.

As someone who had ridden a motorcycle as my preferred form of transport for much of the preceding half century, and with a background based in mathematics, the research resulted in a personal epiphany.

To put it in perspective, if 10% of the drivers on the road were driving with 0.08 blood alcohol content, there would be a massive outcry at the mayhem being caused. Logically, such behavior would be stopped immediately in any developed country.

Not only hasn't it been stopped, the people we have elected to govern us have now legislated almost unanimously, in almost all developed countries, to ensure that hands-free devices are okay for use on public roads, and handheld cell phones whilst driving are not.

It doesn't make sense, and after giving it some thought, it resulted in my motorcycle riding being curtailed almost entirely. A dented fender on a car is roughly the equivalent of a broken leg or much worse for a motorcyclist, and I decided to err on the side of caution given the growing threat of always-connected voice and video and text-messaging on the road.

Distracted driving isn't new. We've always had passengers to talk to, kids to control, hair to coiff in the rear vision mirror, documents to read and meetings to "prepare for" while we were stuck in traffic. As technology has advanced rapidly, the number of compelling distractions has grown. At first it was the car radio, better radio stations to find, and then the compact cassette player (with linear access which needed constant shuttling to find what you were looking for), the CD player, digital radio and now texting, anmd the internet to keep our minds exactly where they shouldn't be.

There's an epidemic sweeping the roads of the world called distracted driving, and if you spend a lot of time on the roads, sooner or later it will impact you, quite literally.

So I decided to reduce the risk posed to me by other road users by reducing my time in traffic on a motorcycle. Motorcyclists, pushbike riders and pedestrians are the most vulnerable of road users - they are disproportionately representative in traffic deaths by comparison with car drivers, and similarly, they are way overrepresented in the roughly 75 million road accidents which occur each year across the planet. I did not wish to become a statistic.

Then I started traveling to less developed countries a lot more, and remarkably, I began riding again - in an environment where the dangers are far greater. I now travel with a $1000 helmet in my baggage, because I know that the only way to travel in most Asian countries is by motorcycle. In Ho Chi Minh city, for instance, a lengthy journey by motorcycle will take less than half the time taken by a car.

In many countries, people come up to me regularly to ask about the helmet, and how much it costs. I feel embarrassed to tell them its cost because to them, my helmet represents several months of the family income. I started travelling with the helmet in Vietnam, after finding that 34 people a day die on Vietnamese roads, most of them in my favourite Vietnamese city, Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon).

As a motorcyclist in Europe, America and Australia, I have witnessed plenty of ridiculously stupid behavior by educated, relatively-wealthy car drivers.

As a motorcyclist (and driver and passenger) in Asian countries such as China, Thailand, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam and Cambodia, I have seen the same behavior a lot more clearly. In such countries, the motorcycle is more often than not, the first motorized transport the family has ever owned. It is the equivalent of the family car. Car drivers in developed countries still talk without a hands-free, or text, but when everyone rides a motorcycle, texting and talking is there for everyone to see. It is undisguisedly common behavior.

The following photo gallery is a glimpse of life on the roads in a different country (90%+ of Gizmag readers are in developed countries), where three, four and five people on a motorcycle are commonplace (I once saw SEVEN), where helmets are optional (or cost $10 or less and have dubious impact protection qualities), and where the police forces are too busy with other matters to enforce road rules. In most asian countries, the police only book people who clearly have money - the populace at large is not worth the effort.

This article will continue to be expanded as I add photos and additional thoughts.

Finally, I'm not proposing any answers. The more I travel, the more I realise that human nature is its own enemy and that the combination of the motor vehicle and natural selection are improving the gene pool all over the world, just faster in some countries than others.

Stay tuned, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section.

View gallery - 121 images
20 comments
robinyatesuk2003
not only motorcycle riders sadly, lorry drivers who watch a television whilst driving on the road, car drivers who have music so loud they cannot hear emergency vehicles,cyclists who wobble all over the place when going up a hill instead of walking with their bike. If you remember that you are in charge of a vehicle which is capable of causing death, drive with respect for all other road users, smile and say thanks, give way in traffic etc etc
Renārs Grebežs
robin, don\'t you dare talk about cyclists. Riding up a hill is a tough job and walking, well.. it beats the purpose. It\'s up to the law makers to make roads technically safe and bear in mind that there are all kinds of transportation vehicles (that INCLUDES bicycles), which have to be accounted when designing the transportation system. Not to mention the positive aspects of cycling and the negative of motorized vehicles.
Tony Kalniev
It gets even worse. I live in Thailand. The new government set by Taksin\'s sister, has just announced that the mass public transportation infrastructure will be delayed and eventually canceled in order to finance their new policy: \"every students in the country as well as police officer gets a free tablet computer.\"
This is outrages. Not only will the people that were planning the travel by the public transport buy new cars and motorcycles, therefore increasing traffic resulting in more accidents, but the cops currently control traffic lights. During peak time, you often see the red light on for 1 hour. This is because the cops are watching their favorite Thai soap opera on TV. Now that they will get the tablets, they will have another reason to forget doing their jobs.
Occasionally, I work on movies. I once did a movie role as a cop (full uniform) in the infamous city Pataya. After shooting, I sat down next to the real Thai cop and asked him why he doesn\'t stop those motorcyclists passing by. They dont wear helmets, talk on phones, carry dogs or babies, driver wears helmet but his 3 sons dont, etc. He said he is off duty. I asked him that if he stopped all of those people, then he could get rich off fines and stop this atrocity in one day! I asked: Aren\'t you scared the kids might die if there is an accident? He said not to worry, the kids NEVER die...So I stood up, told him to watch how its done, went to the side of the road and halted the first motorcycle that was wrong. They stopped, ready for a ticket. The cop got pissed off and sat on his motorcycle, without a helmet drove away.
It all comes from example. If cops were to do the right driving manners, wouldn\'t the people follow suit? In addition, he tried to convince me that if he stopped all the motorcycles (and did his job properly) in a week, he could get loads of bribes, but for the rest of the year, no more bribes so no more money. They plan their jobs 1 day per week.
What corruption. I am disgusted. And don\'t get me going about the vehicle drivers here in Thailand, especially the \"hi-so\" rich with their USD 400,000 (imported tax) AMG e-class mercedes and BMW\'s and so on....
Fouture
Bikes wobble. When pedaling uphill, when biking in windy conditions, when avoiding potholes and other road debris. It\'s a natural condition of biking.
The same applies to equestrians, skaters, kids and old people. They wobble. Please adapt your driving style. Cars don\'t own the roads.
Dan_P
Although I agree with most of what is written in this article, and some of those pictures, I am conditioned to be shocked by.
However, please remember that we are designed by nature with a basic need to take risk, especially young males. Without this need, the human race could not have survived. Right now, we have never lived in such risk free times, but I\'m sure we have lived in happier times.
Humans can be so arrogant in that we believe the laws of nature that apply to animals in general, don\'t apply to us.
It\'s a shame.
TexByrnes
Note that ALL the adults shown in the photos are wearing helmets....none of the children are.......are kids cheap over there? Ian Colley.
coolfire
Sorry to see so few posts, and some of those off the subject, on this important article.
As long as we have had cell phones, all the studies have demonstrated that their use while driving is as dangerous as DUI, i.e., driving drunk, and their use while driving has caused as many deaths as driving drunk.
And those results were prior to the arrival of texting.
Just those killed in the US from using cell phones while driving exceed the aggregate number of people killed by actual terrorism world-wide annually. But protecting people from the self-focused idiots who use cell phones while driving would not reap the political benefits that scaring people about terrorism does. Were any government interested in protecting the lives of its citizens, it would prioritize by risk to life. The US certainly does not, and I expect that none do.
Gubbins
Regardless of what idiot adults do, there is NO excuse for risking the lives of innocent children, commonplace amongst the photos posted. Stacked up like sardines and without even a hint of the protection afforded by a helmet, this is a disgrace. I feel sorry for these helpless little kids. Why would YOU wear a helmet but not have one for your child?
TheRogue1000
I often wonder why is it that most folks are unable to take things as they are? Those motorcycle/scooters in Asia are the family cars. They are proud of them, proud to take the whole family on them. It is their own lives they are risking, too. And helmets are simply beyond them financially. Yes, \"innocent\" children die every day, all over the world. So do innocent adults. Are the latter somehow less valuable than the former? Would you prefer that they all live to 120 so as to truly overfill the world?
So mind your own damned business instead of calling for new laws, complaining about conditions in a country where you do not live and generally making a nuisance of yourself. Get a life of your own and try to live it without poking your nose into everyone else\'s!
mrhuckfin
Right on TheRogue1000! Apparently if you eat just right, exercise all the time and never do ONE SINGLE dangerous thing EVER you will NEVER DIE! Now I\'m not suggesting for a moment that people shouldn\'t be careful where ever possible BUT we have become such nanny state safety-crats the world over that it\'s amazing to me that anybody has the ability to stay alive on there own anymore? For one thing I\'d say people don\'t really, but haven\'t we always as been a species of risk takers through out our human history? And besides if you believe in evolution why are you all trying to stop this whole \"survival of the fittest\" thing from taking place? That\'s just the way we\'re wired isn\'t it? Yes it\'s dump what people do in defiance of absolute common since but REALLY stop trying to outlaw everything? There are TON\'S of laws the world over to deal with people who mess up and believe me I\'ve had to deal with a few! You\'ll never stop stupid human antics with piles of intrusive laws, and don\'t tell me that you hope I get hurt or killed by one of these people because of what I think, you\'ll more then likely be injured or killed just the same even if there are draconian laws in place to protect you and then what good was the law to you? I\'ll figure out how to survive on my own thank you!