Energy

40% of US lithium needs could come from unlikely source in Pennsylvania

40% of US lithium needs could come from unlikely source in Pennsylvania
Runoff from fracking operations is not usually considered a good thing, but a new finding reveals it could be a source of a very valuable metal
Runoff from fracking operations is not usually considered a good thing, but a new finding reveals it could be a source of a very valuable metal
View 1 Image
Runoff from fracking operations is not usually considered a good thing, but a new finding reveals it could be a source of a very valuable metal
1/1
Runoff from fracking operations is not usually considered a good thing, but a new finding reveals it could be a source of a very valuable metal

Thanks to the increase of electric vehicles and other battery-using technologies, the demand for lithium is expected to skyrocket in the coming years. One odd but potent source of the metal is a Pennsylvania wastewater stream, says a new study.

As we've reported previously, based on current demand, the world is going to need about 59 new lithium mines hauling out 45,000 tonnes of the metal by 2035. The silvery metal is a key component of rechargeable batteries which are powering seemingly everything these days from countertop ice cube makers to freight ships.

Due to the growing demand for lithium, researchers are developing quicker ways to harvest it from the brine pits which, along with more traditional mines, are a primary source of the element. They are also looking in other places for sources of the material.

One of those places is a wastewater stream produced as a result of a fracking operation outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. There, operators of the Marcellus shale gas wells need to report levels of certain materials in the wastewater to regulators. Because the reports must mention lithium levels, researchers from the University of Pittsburgh were able to conduct an analysis that showed that if a technique could be developed that would remove 100% of the lithium from the wastewater, about 40% of America's demand for the metal could be met.

Currently, lithium can be removed from water with an efficiency rate of more than 90%, so the goal is not too far away.

And while the wastewater at these particular fracking mines is rich in lithium, they are not the only sources of Marcellus shale in the country. West Virginia could also be a rich source, say the researchers.

Because the US Geological survey has classified lithium as a critical mineral (technically an element), the government wants all lithium produced domestically by 2030. In terms of resource allocation, that would be an improvement over the current method which consists of extracting it from brine ponds in Chile, shipping it to China to be processed, and shipping it back to the States for use.

The next step for exploring the wastewater stream as a source of lithium is to analyze the environmental impacts of extracting it and to build a pilot plant to research and develop more efficient extraction techniques.

“Wastewater from oil and gas is a burgeoning issue,” says study lead author Justin Mackey. “Right now, it’s just minimally treated and reinjected.” However, he adds that developing better extraction techniques could provide serious value in turning a wastewater into something much more valuable. “It’s been dissolving rocks for hundreds of millions of years – essentially, the water has been mining the subsurface,” he says.

A paper about the finding has been published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Source: University of Pittsburgh

10 comments
10 comments
guzmanchinky
But what about the new batteries that don't use Lithium? And what about the plant they are building to extract Lithium in the desert outside of Los Angeles?
Douglas Rogers
Lithium is also a prime candidate fusion fuel!
Captain Danger
Hurrah for Fracking!
Not only does it provide cheap oil for my V8 , it can also provide Lithium for the Greta crowd.
Chec78
Yes, I agree with guzmanchinky. What about the new batteries coming out that don't use Lithium?
Aross
Why not develop a process to remove all usable but polluting elements and minerals from waste water.
Karmudjun
Thanks Michael, your synopsis of the source article appears spot on - but the comments subsequent don't seem spot on! Yes, the projections and estimations of science do indicate a need for more lithium production. The findings of the article indicate a need for improved lithium recovery techniques and subsequent cost analysis of the processes as well as scaling up! As for Guz and Chek78 - What about the innovations in batteries? They may prove useful and scale up into production, or not! That is independent of these findings. Your comments and the article remain "Mutually exclusive". Good review Michael!!
Charles
Lithium is a rare earth metal. And people still don't see the problem with electric vehicles, lithium battery tools, lipo battery drones, electric bikes, electric scooters, electric mowers, etc. that need to run on a lithium based battery? Soon enough, lithium will be hard/expensive to come by just like oil. And the batteries don't last all that long!
TomLeeM
I think the more we get it from within the USA, the less we rely on it from outside the USA and less that they can use it to control the USA. I think they development of batteries that don't use lithium is great; less dependent on foreign sources of it means less dependent on other countries. I think the hybrid is a bridge from gas to electric vehicles. even hybrids have batteries with lithium. the more we move away from outside sources; IMO, the better.
ljaques
From what I've read about fracking liquid, up to 650 different toxic chemicals are used in it to lube the drill bit and shafts and perform other functions. That crap ain't making it into our freshwater streams! @Aross has a point about finding ways to remove toxins and minerals from wastewater. And there are at least 2 different lithium sources being started in NV, as well as Elon Musks' new lithium recycling and processing plant near GIGA Nevada.
madsci
Charles, lithium is an alkali metal along with sodium, it is not a rare earth metal (those are at the bottom of the periodic table). Hopefully batteries will be designed with improved longevity with more research. My Ryobi tool batteries appear to be working very well over the last several years and hopefully will continue to do so. However, would hope that the metal could be recycled when the batteries fail. Price can be a concern if demand outstrips supply. Guess we will transition to an alternative metal or material at that time for batteries, which will likely be far in the future given our slow transition from petrol.