Energy

This startup raised millions to beam solar power from space after dark

This startup raised millions to beam solar power from space after dark
Northern Virginia-based Overview Energy is joining the race to beam solar power to Earth from space
Northern Virginia-based Overview Energy is joining the race to beam solar power to Earth from space
View 3 Images
Northern Virginia-based Overview Energy is joining the race to beam solar power to Earth from space
1/3
Northern Virginia-based Overview Energy is joining the race to beam solar power to Earth from space
The company demonstrated its tech in November 2025 from a plane 3 miles up in the air, using the same optics chain and regular solar panels it intends to use from geosynchronous orbit
2/3
The company demonstrated its tech in November 2025 from a plane 3 miles up in the air, using the same optics chain and regular solar panels it intends to use from geosynchronous orbit
Overview Energy says it's building the first-ever satellite system for gigawatt-scale energy generation
3/3
Overview Energy says it's building the first-ever satellite system for gigawatt-scale energy generation
View gallery - 3 images

Another day, another ambitious company emerges to harness the power of the Sun from Earth's orbit.

Okay, it's not quite that common an occurrence, but there are indeed a number of firms giving this a go. The latest to join the fold is Overview Energy, a Northern Virginia-based startup that's raised US$20 million to try transmitting solar power from satellites down to solar panels on Earth, enabling a 24/7 supply.

Specifically, it plans to use wide-beam near-infrared lasers to continuously deliver power from satellites in geosynchronous orbit (about 22,000 miles or 36,000 km above the Earth's surface) to existing solar farms. At that altitude, the Sun is visible around the clock, which means Overview's constellation could help make use of existing solar projects to generate electricity during the 65%-75% of time during the day when they're otherwise idle.

The company notes this can benefit homeowners by reducing electricity price spikes, and increasing the resilience of connected grids powering critical facilities. The same constellation can also serve different regions throughout the day.

Overview Energy says it's building the first-ever satellite system for gigawatt-scale energy generation
Overview Energy says it's building the first-ever satellite system for gigawatt-scale energy generation

To prove its tech is up to the task, Overview completed an airborne demo last month, in which a Cessna Caravan light aircraft transmitted power using a laser to a ground receiver made up of conventional solar panels from an altitude of 3 miles (5 km). The startup claims this is the first-ever example of high-power wireless power transfer from any moving platform. And since it uses the startup's own optics chain and lasers that it plans to use in space, along with regular old solar panels on the ground, this validates its approach ahead of scaling things up.

The company demonstrated its tech in November 2025 from a plane 3 miles up in the air, using the same optics chain and regular solar panels it intends to use from geosynchronous orbit
The company demonstrated its tech in November 2025 from a plane 3 miles up in the air, using the same optics chain and regular solar panels it intends to use from geosynchronous orbit

It's worth noting that it’s still significantly cheaper to deploy more solar panels here on Earth than to capture sunlight and send it down here from space. While beaming power wirelessly from orbit down to Earth is a commendable endeavor, it'll have to practically compete with the possibly simpler route: expanding solar farms on Earth, and further developing battery storage solutions to increase capacity and reduce costs.

Overview's sunlight-beaming satellites won't be alone in space. Aetherflux is also gearing up to demo its power transmission system next year with portable ground stations, and UK-based Space Solar hopes to send power to a demonstrator in Iceland by 2030.

There's also New Zealand's Emrod, which aims to use a microwave-based transmission system. TechCrunch's Tim De Chant points out that this approach can't reuse existing solar farms and instead relies on proprietary ground stations as receivers; these microwave beams also have to be more powerful, and so the companies behind them have to figure out workarounds that prevent harming passerby birds and aircraft. That makes Overview's near-infrared laser-based method seem more plausible in comparison. We also don't yet know enough about the efficiency of this system, and what the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCoE) will work out to be.

Up next for Overview is a pilot project, in which it will have a satellite up in low Earth orbit sometime in 2028. Subsequently, the company hopes to begin delivering power from higher up at geosynchronous orbit by 2030. While it's confident that it's validated its solution, with altitude being the only major remaining variable, the proof will be in the solar-oven-baked pudding.

Source: Overview Energy

View gallery - 3 images
5 comments
5 comments
paul314
Just for the back of the envelope, if you generously figure 30% efficiency for the solar cells on the satellites, 30% efficiency for the lasers sending the power down to earth, not atmospheric losses, and 30% efficiency for the ground-based cells, that would be a little less than 3% efficiency total. (Ground-based cells will actually be more efficient that that, because the near-IR is in the best part of their absorption range, but you're going to get atmospheric absorption and beam spreading, so close enough.) If grid-scale storage batteries weren't getting cheaper every week, this might be plausible.
I wonder if someone will want this for long-duration solar-powered aircraft that can't carry a lot of battery.
rgbatduke
My two standard comments on any nonsense like this: a) It's a weapon. Principle reason nobody should ever be permitted to orbit a solar farm capable of deliving gigawatts or more to an adjustably small surface area. Forget harming birds by accident -- worry about harming people and infrastructure and the satellites of other nations on purpose. b) The economics of putting solar power into orbit are so incredibly, insanely ridiculous that any proposal like this is simply yet another effort to pump money out of your tax dollars or wildcat investors or both on a boondoggle that if it sells to anybody, it'll sell to the miltary, figleafed by its nominal purpose. Every kilogram in near-earth orbit has 32 million joules more energy than that same kilogram on the ground. Geosync orbits have even more, over 50 MJ/kg. To give that kilogram the energy needed to get into orbit you have to burn many times that much energy as fuel. It currently costs order of $10,000 to put a kilogram in geosync orbit. One kilogram of solar cells -- in orbit or not -- can produce no more than order of 200 watts, but say it produces 1000, or 1 kW. One kW-hour of electricity costs consumers approximately $0.10. Being again generous, say that there are 10,000 hours in a year. It would take 10 years of energy to pay the nominal cost of putting the kg of solar cells in orbit, or roughly half of its probable lifetime, only the cost of the money used to fund this would have doubled the cost in less than 10 years so you'd actually NEVER recoup a positive ROI. And this analysis ignores all sorts of details, every one of them AGAINST doing this, none of them FOR -- such as the miserable efficiencies and the fact that you'd still have to distribute the energy to households from whatever NIMBY receiver you manage to get built, and the fact that the solar cells themselves and orbital infrastructure would add several thousand dollars to the cost of that kilogram..
On the other hand, it would cost less than $1000 to build and site one 1 kW worth of solar cells right here on the surface of the Earth. This investment AND interest AND the distributed cost of additional infrastructure makes the time to positive ROI less than 5 years, with 15 years of nearly pure profit at 20% or more return. The down-to-Earth sites would be -- are being -- built right where they can easily tie into the existing grid, out in the country where NIMBY isn't an issue. Solar farms are springing up all over NC because it is literally the cheapest form of new power, worldwide; it's just a matter of riding out the revolving financing so the power companies stay cash positive while building them.
It is ALSO comparatively cheap to extend the distribution grid itself -- make electricity in one place and use it (say) 1000 miles away. Certainly cheaper than shipping things into and out of orbit. Finally, there are at least 3 or 4 battery technologies that I know of -- largely THROUGH New Atlas articles -- capable of storing electrical energy at high efficiency and in commercial grade amounts. MIT has one. Australia has another, similar but different. ANY of these would be cheaper to implement on a large scale than orbital weapons disguised as eco-friendly solar.
CraigAllenCorson
Any project that means to gather solar energy in space, then beam it down to an already-warming Earth, can most charitably be described as ill-advised.
Trylon
We went through solar power satellite concepts back in the '70s. It was impractical then and it's still impractical today.
Tommo
I'm no conspiracy theorist but this project does indeed sound like something I've heard before. Space lasers causing fires in the USA anyone?