Drones

Review: Gladius Advanced Pro underwater drone turns the seabed into an adventure zone

View 17 Images
The Gladius Advanced Pro is one of a range of new underwater drones beginning to show up on the market
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Twin rear props provide forward and reverse motion
Loz Blain/New Atlas
These plucky little props give the Gladius a top speed of 4 knots, or just a little too slow to chase a manta ray
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Twin 1,200-lumen lamps either side of the camera give the Gladius the ability to operate in dark and murky conditions
Loz Blain/New Atlas
The Gladius Advanced Pro is one of a range of new underwater drones beginning to show up on the market
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Twin mid props handle pitch and roll control
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Fully waterproof in freshwater or seawater
Loz Blain/New Atlas
The Gladius operates on a long tether cable and can reach depths up to 100 m (330 ft)
Loz Blain/New Atlas
The tether cable is rated for a 100 kg weight, meaning you can use it to lift the drone in and out of the water without fear of it snapping
Loz Blain/New Atlas
It takes two backpacks to carry the Gladius system – one for the drone and controller, the other for the tether/Wi-Fi buoy
Loz Blain/New Atlas
The whole system weighs around 5 kg (11 lb), so it's a bit of a pain to lug about
Loz Blain/New Atlas
The controller opens out wide enough for a ten-inch tablet
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas
Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas
View gallery - 17 images

Underwater drones are starting to become more popular, and the Gladius is one of the better-specified ones you'll find. Capable of diving for over four hours, to depths of 330 ft (100 m), with a 4K camera and 2,400-lumen spotlights, it makes for some fascinating underwater exploration.

Flying camera drones have only been about for a few short years, but as recent drone photography contests would attest, they've already done a magnificent job of opening up new perspectives. Now, there's a growing market of underwater drones that aim to do the same thing for the aquatic perspective.

Underwater drones have certain advantages; the ability to control buoyancy can make them much more energy-efficient than aerial drones, which need to constantly expend energy to stay aloft. So underwater drones can get a ton more run-time out of a battery, which is lucky, because you sure don't want to be changing charged batteries on a dripping wet drone.

On the downside, wireless Bluetooth and Wi-Fi signals can't get through water, so pretty much any consumer underwater drone is going to need to run on a tether cable, and those can get messy if you're giving them a decent range.

The controller opens out wide enough for a ten-inch tablet
Loz Blain/New Atlas

The Gladius Advanced Pro, by Chinese company Chasing Innovation, is the first underwater drone I've had a chance to play with. It's the top unit in the Gladius line, with a 4K camera, 64 GB of built-in storage, 2,400 lumens of LED lighting, and a remarkable maximum depth of 328 ft (100 m).

It's a fair bit bulkier than a consumer-grade aerial drone, but you can carry the Gladius around in a backpack, while its tether station lives in a separate shoulder bag. The combined weight is up around 5 kg (11 lb), so it's a decent weight to lug about.

Setup is reasonably quick. You plug the drone into the tether, turn on the tether station to set up a Wi-Fi network, then slot your phone or tablet into the controller, connect to the Wi-Fi and you're ready to go. You may need to remember a Phillips head screwdriver to make sure you've got the right ballast weight on, depending on whether you're operating in fresh or seawater. All the ports on the drone and the tether station are fitted with waterproofing caps, so you need to make sure you don't lose those.

It takes two backpacks to carry the Gladius system – one for the drone and controller, the other for the tether/Wi-Fi buoy
Loz Blain/New Atlas

From there, you lower the drone into the water. Dangling it on the tether cable feels like a bad idea, but you needn't worry, as it's rated to carry 100 kg (220 lb) without breaking. You unspool and throw out as much tether as you think you'll need, and the Gladius bobs around in the water until you open up the IF.Dive app on your screen, and arm the motors ready to fly.

I say fly not just because that's how submarine designer Graham Hawkes explained underwater motion to me when I was about to test drive his Deepflight Dragon sub, but because that's really how it feels when you control the Gladius – more like flying a model aircraft than a DJI Phantom.

The left stick controls the throttles, giving you forward and reverse motion, and steering the drone on its yaw axis. The right stick controls tilt, allowing you to aim the nose up and down and roll the craft left and right. So there's no facility to simply have the drone pull itself straight downward to submerge, you've got to point the nose down and move forward. Other buttons start/stop video recording, snap stills, control the output of the LED forward lights, and engage/disengage a stabilizer mode that I preferred to leave off.

As somebody who doesn't go snorkeling, and who has only been under once with scuba gear, I was amazed by just how much is going on under the surface. My first flight was off the pier at Blairgowrie in Victoria, where I'd been told the spider crabs were out in force. No kidding! There were thousands of the little guys under there, wandering about and snacking on seaweed.

Gladius Advanced Pro sample photo: murky water and full-power spotlights make the camera look worse than it is
Loz Blain/New Atlas

Just as I was getting eye to eye with a few hundred crabs, a giant shadow passed beneath me – a sting ray as wide as my outstretched arms, rippling its way hypnotically along past my camera. I spun the drone around and gave chase. "They come in to feed on the crabs," came a voice from over my shoulder, and I turned around to realize three or four people had stopped to watch the vision on my screen. That became a theme wherever I flew the Gladius – these things are as much of a curiosity to passers-by as aerial drones were when they first started appearing.

Mind you, they're nowhere near as problematic. Try to land a drone when a group of people has gathered around, and you're almost certainly going to have to break some laws or tell people to move. With an underwater drone, it's the more the merrier, nothing's going to fall on anyone's head. And it's easy enough to operate that I was able to let my four-year-old take the sticks for a few minutes. Sick of always watching and never getting a chance to fly the other drones I bring home, he was absolutely thrilled to fly this thing.

Once it's underwater and out of sight, it can be hard to tell what the heck's going on by looking at the screen. If the water's not crystal clear, all you can see is blue a lot of the time, until you get down close to the sea bed or approach the surface. And if you reach the end of the tether wire and start pulling on the spool, that can tug the drone in all sorts of directions.

The whole system weighs around 5 kg (11 lb), so it's a bit of a pain to lug about
Loz Blain/New Atlas

Luckily, there's an orientation meter on the control screen, a 3D model of the Gladius that shows which way it's pointed. So even if you can't tell where the drone is under the water, at least you know which direction it's pointed. Want to find the sea bed? Point it down and go. Once it's time to come up, you can point it upward and throttle on, confident that you'll get a visual on its bright lights it when it surfaces.

Unfortunately, I didn't get the chance to fly the Gladius in very clear water, so the footage I captured probably doesn't show the camera in a great light. And that's a pity, because I think it's actually a decent little unit capable of a GoPro-equivalent image. But it's the middle of a windy, rainy winter in my part of the world, so the water was murky and I needed the spotlights on full power most of the time. I'd have loved to take it to somewhere tropical, with clear water and coral to look at, but didn't have the chance.

The Gladius is easy to fly, but hard to be precise with. That makes it great for exploring, zooming around on the ocean floor checking things out. But once you find something, keeping it in frame and setting up a nice shot can be pretty difficult. The currents move you about, making your footage look a bit drunk. You've got a very limited ability to move sideways, so you're stuck trying to hold yourself as still as you can or moving forwards. And the twin 1,200-lumen lights either side of the camera do a great job of illuminating what's right in front of you, but they also give the footage a bit of a stark, "built-in flash" kind of look.

For these reasons, I can't see something like this becoming a substitute for an underwater cameraman. Being underwater, hand-holding a GoPro or some better camera will still likely net you better footage if that's your goal. On the other hand, throwing the Gladius out of the boat to do some exploration is a lot quicker than suiting up for a dive, and you can fly it regardless of whether there are sharks in the area, for example.

Getting it out of the water's much the same as putting it in – you lift it out by the tether cable after disarming the motors. At this point, you're more or less stuck waiting for it to dry off before you can put it away. Rolling up the tether cable can be a bit of a pain, and you've got to make a call on when you think things are dry enough to disconnect the cable, making sure you don't let any water into the contacts before getting the rubber caps back on. I'd recommend bringing a towel, because if you put either the drone or the tether roll away soggy in their little watertight bags within the backpack and carry bag, they'll stay soggy until the next time you get them out.

Twin rear props provide forward and reverse motion
Loz Blain/New Atlas

Battery life simply wasn't a consideration for me. At 30 percent throttle with the lights off, it'll run for 4.5 hours. Likewise, the 64 GB of onboard storage means you don't need to worry about SD cards. On the other hand, getting footage out into the real world is a bit of a pain. You've got to reconnect the drone to the tether station when you get home, then transfer what ends up being several gigabytes of footage to your phone or tablet, then upload them again to your PC wirelessly if your phone doesn't do removable storage.

It's an actively aggravating process that can take hours depending on your network speeds, and it fills up your devices with annoyingly large video files – although I can understand the waterproofing issues it might cause to put a USB port on the drone for direct transfers. I don't have a better solution.

All in all, I think the Gladius is a pretty terrific gadget. The underwater landscape is a strange and alien one if you don't spend a lot of time diving, and this kind of device makes for fascinating fun as you explore it. My kid thinks it's deadly cool, although he also really digs leaves, so take his opinion for what it's worth. I don't see it as a better tool for cinematography than a diver holding a camera, although you can definitely get the odd keeper out of it with a bit of practice. I'd like to try taking it out on a fishing trip to see if it's got any value as a fish spotting tool. In fact, having one on your boat would make for some interesting opportunities, and flying it in clear tropical waters would be absolutely amazing.

At US$2,199, it's certainly not cheap enough to be an impulse gadget buy for most people. There's a cheaper Gladius Standard Pro for US$1,749, which films in 1080p/60fps, has a smaller 16 GB internal memory, and only goes down to 164 ft (50 m). I think I'd get similar value out of the Standard Pro; 4K footage is nice, but it's also a pain to deal with, particularly when you have to move it all wirelessly. But even that's still a fair old chunk of change. At least for your money, you're getting a well-built, seaworthy and easy-to-use unit.

You can check out some of the underwater action we captured in the video below.

Source: Chasing Innovation

View gallery - 17 images
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
4 comments
Booleanboy
An interesting little craft. Running an android emulator like Bluestacks on a PC might save one step in the downloading process.
flyerfly
This is not a "drone" at all but a simple remote control craft. If it does not have autonomous controls then it is not a "drone". It has a tether... why can't people these days stop calling everything that is remote controlled a "drone"? If I tow a GoPro around on a weighted string is it a drone (controlled from the surface by moving string)?!
Cheers.
MQ
flyerfly...... DRONE as in remotely piloted commercial aircraft has no official definition. It isn't an official term and the media uses it however they like.
Anyone purporting to be a DRONER should be schooling them to be called Remotely piloted Aircraft or Uninhabited/Unmanned Aircraft.
DIY DRONES is a misnomer by Chris Anderson for promotion of his Arduino based products originally...
FliteTest and RCModelreviews have also become very relaxed with lax terminology.
Nothing in any common usage indicates that a DRONE is AUTONOMOUS except for promoters of the idea like yourself... lol.. Drones are synonymous with model aircraft (just not models or any real aircraft so probably better known as miniature aircraft- Many "model aircraft aren't really models of any full size bus either....
Real professionals will always define the term.. Back it up with official defined terminology. or you don't represent anyone but yourself....
Btw multicopters aren't drones either (by default), though the general uninformed public may automatically call them as such. The original drones in the public conscience were remotely piloted DUMB artillery and recon aircraft....
LOL rant over.. just raising awareness, and I'm correct despite whatever Oxford dictionary chooses to publish amongst the hottest words of the decade.
flyerfly
@MD Since you have defined it that way fine...not sure why you think I am a promoter of the idea since I don't normally "promote" as you call it. I used to work with folks in the aerospace industry that designed RPV's and you are right in that the aerospace industry did not typically refer to them as "drones" but UAV, RPV etc etc. I am also familiar with the "drone" targets...I am a pilot as well as engineer. I guess it just got me irked since so many people these days refer to things in a goofy way...sorry if you felt I was adding to that goofy trend.
I used to fly model aircraft and they were never referred to as "drones" back in the day. My frustration stems from the fact that the media and now the government want to control ALL small aircraft even though they are completely different. It all stemmed from what things were called. Now anything that flies is a "drone" and my old RC planes are on the FAA hit list?!
Same goes for "assault" guns...don't get me started there. Words don't mean what they used to mean and that is a shame.
Cheers