Health & Wellbeing

Biggest genetic study of supercentenarians reveals clues to healthy aging

Biggest genetic study of super...
A whole genome study discovered a number of genetic characteristics unique to those who live well past 100
A whole genome study discovered a number of genetic characteristics unique to those who live well past 100
View 1 Image
A whole genome study discovered a number of genetic characteristics unique to those who live well past 100
A whole genome study discovered a number of genetic characteristics unique to those who live well past 100

In the most detailed genomic study ever conducted of individuals over the age of 100 years, researchers have homed in on several particular genetic characteristics that seem to confer protection from age-related diseases. Gene variants improving DNA repair processes were particularly prominent in this cohort of supercentenarians.

If you eat well, exercise frequently and avoid those detrimental vices, you can reasonably hope to live a long and healthy life. Of course, many age-related diseases seem almost inevitable, whether they catch up with you in your 80s or your 90s. But some people show a propensity for extreme longevity, living healthily well past the age of 100.

Research has shown those who live beyond the age of 100 tend to present extraordinarily healthy signs of aging. They are less likely to have been hospitalized in earlier life and have seemed to avoid many age-related conditions most people battle in their 80s or 90s, such as heart disease or neurodegeneration.

This new study presents a comprehensive investigation of 81 semi-supercentenarians (aged over 105) and supercentenarians (aged over 110). The researchers also matched this cohort against a group of healthy, geographically matched subjects aged in their late 60s. The goal was to genetically distinguish those generally healthy people in their late 60s from those extremely healthy supercentenarians.

Five particular genetic changes were commonly detected in the supercentenarian cohort, concentrated around two genes called STK17A and COA1.

STK17A is known to be involved in DNA damage response processes. As we age, the body’s DNA repair mechanisms become less effective. Accumulated DNA damage is known to be responsible for some signs of aging, so increased expression of STK17A can favor healthy aging by preserving DNA repair processes in old age.

Reduced expression of COA1 in the supercentenarians was also detected. This gene plays a role in communications between a cell’s nucleus and mitochondria.

“Previous studies showed that DNA repair is one of the mechanisms allowing an extended lifespan across species," explains senior author on the new study, Cristina Giuliani. "We showed that this is true also within humans, and data suggest that the natural diversity in people reaching the last decades of life are, in part, linked to genetic variability that gives semi-supercentenarians the peculiar capability of efficiently managing cellular damage during their life course."

The researchers also found the supercentenarians displayed an unexpectedly low level of somatic gene mutations, which are the mutations we all generally accumulate as we grow older. It is unclear why these older subjects have avoided the age-related exponential increase usually seen with these kinds of mutations.

“Our results suggest that DNA repair mechanisms and a low burden of mutations in specific genes are two central mechanisms that have protected people who have reached extreme longevity from age-related diseases, says Claudio Franceschi, another senior author on the study.

The new research was published in the journal eLife.

Source: eLife

Sign me up for more of that STK17A stuff and less and COA1 stuff.
Don Duncan
I know an 88 year old who eats terrible, but exercises/works a lot daily. He refused to stop for a vacation during his life and has overcome major injuries that would have killed most, twice. He doesn't believe in diet or vitamins, never admits it when he is wrong and won't take advice.
Lamar Havard
There was a local woman on the news a few days ago who turned 106...she attributes it to PB&J sandwiches!
If 90% of all human illnesses are due to some sort of nutritional deficiency, then I suspect nutrition plays a large part in living a long life. I also wonder what role blood type may play in long lived humans. Blood type seems to be the often ignored aspect of the human organism in these studies. Is there really a big difference between the Rh Positives and Rh Negatives? And what role does government and the medical profession play in these research reports? I'm thinking about the current covid/mRNA shot and its long term effects on human life.