Robotics

New controller makes operating an excavator almost instinctive

New controller makes operating an excavator almost instinctive
The World-Space Interface, gripped like the excavator's own bucket instead of a joystick
The World-Space Interface, gripped like the excavator's own bucket instead of a joystick
View 4 Images
The World-Space Interface, gripped like the excavator's own bucket instead of a joystick
1/4
The World-Space Interface, gripped like the excavator's own bucket instead of a joystick
The next challenge is adding a sense of touch that today's controller doesn't yet have
2/4
The next challenge is adding a sense of touch that today's controller doesn't yet have
The gesture that replaces the mental map is closing a fist over virtual dirt
3/4
The gesture that replaces the mental map is closing a fist over virtual dirt
Seated at the WSI, an operator faces the same task-progress metrics researchers used to score novices against veterans
4/4
Seated at the WSI, an operator faces the same task-progress metrics researchers used to score novices against veterans
View gallery - 4 images

Watching skilled excavator operators work is almost hypnotic. They make it look so easy that the machine seems to move like an extension of the operator's own arm. That intuition usually takes years to build, but a new controller from MIT engineers compresses that learning curve to a single session.

Excavators are among the most common machines on any job site, used to dig foundations, clear debris, and level ground. Yet mastering one is anything but simple. Standard joystick controls force an operator to translate every wrist flick into cabin rotation, arm extension, or bucket movement, an unnatural mapping that engineers call a mental model. Building that mental model typically takes years of practice.

A team led by Hermano Krebs, a principal research scientist in MIT's Department of Mechanical Engineering, took a different approach: instead of training people to think like a machine, they built a machine that understands how the human body already moves.

Digging in, faster

"This is a more intuitive way to command the machine," Krebs says. "With this new interface, we can eliminate a lot of the mental maps that an operator would need to build in order to operate an excavator." The team's findings appear in the Journal of Computing and Civil Engineering.

The device, called the World-Space Interface (WSI), is a miniature excavator arm and bucket that the operator physically grips and moves the way they'd move their own arm while digging by hand: extending it, rotating it, closing a simulated fist over the dirt. A wraparound six-panel display projects a virtual excavator that mirrors every gesture instantly.

"‘World-space’ refers to everything in the world that is outside of yourself, or in this case, outside of the excavator’s cab," Krebs explains. "Normally, operators have to build a mental map of how to manipulate things in the world-space. But now, we can just mime picking up rocks or dirt, and the computer will do that translation to the world-space for us."

The researchers don't see this staying confined to training simulators. Krebs envisions the same controller mounted directly in a real cabin, functioning almost like a prosthetic, an oversized extension of the operator's arm.

The next challenge is adding a sense of touch that today's controller doesn't yet have
The next challenge is adding a sense of touch that today's controller doesn't yet have

"Instead of having joysticks, you might have this miniature arm on the side, where the operator would place their own arm, kind of like an exoskeleton, which would allow them to operate the excavator in the cab," he says. "If work has to be done in a difficult or unsafe environment, you could have an operator sitting off-site in a trailer and using this arm to remotely tele-operate the excavator."

To test whether the concept held up outside the lab, the team ran training experiments with both expert and novice volunteers, who used the WSI as well as a conventional joystick-based simulator. The researchers built 15 virtual scenarios, covering construction sites, highways, forest roads, riverbanks, mining areas, and urban and rural settings. Tasks included scooping and dumping sand or gravel, digging and grading trenches, clearing debris from roads, removing tree branches from water edges, and breaking up rocks. Volunteers trained one hour a day for seven days, mirroring a typical weeklong excavator driving course.

With joysticks, novices performed consistently worse than experts, though they did improve over the training period. With the World-Space Interface, that gap vanished entirely: novices matched expert performance from the very first session. "In this case, joysticks are a non-intuitive way to control and coordinate the machine," says study co-author and MIT postdoc Joao Buzzatto. "This is the first interface that does not require me to command the excavator with joysticks."

Seated at the WSI, an operator faces the same task-progress metrics researchers used to score novices against veterans
Seated at the WSI, an operator faces the same task-progress metrics researchers used to score novices against veterans

The system currently gives the operator no physical feedback, so the team is now working to add haptics (force feedback that simulates the sense of touch) to the mechanical arm. The idea is that as an operator mimes picking up a pile of rocks, the arm would generate a force in response, as if the operator could feel the heaviness of the rocks, confirming that the excavator is indeed picking them up. "Haptics would make this an even more intuitive system," says co-author and visiting engineer Solmon Jeong.

MIT isn't alone in this race. Caterpillar, Hyundai, and Komatsu are all developing their own simulators for training and eventual remote operation, but these remain largely based on traditional joystick controllers that still take time to learn. Whether this approach eventually leads toward mecha-robots like Mazinger Z (exoskeleton-controlled machines) or fully autonomous excavators with no cabin occupant at all remains an open question, but the gap between human gesture and machine motion is clearly starting to close.

Source: MIT

View gallery - 4 images
4 comments
4 comments
David Labuda
Having been an operator for more than 20 years i can only laugh at anyone who proclaimed that in one session of training they can be called an operator. I can teach anyone how to make a machine move that doesn't make an operator. To many other factors are essential to safely excavated anywhere. Only engineers at a school could be so condescending. I've seen millions of dollars in damage from new operators thinking all you have to know is how to make a machine move. To all the construction firms thinking about employing this technology get ready to go bankrupt when a fiber cable, major power distribution line, water or any number of other pieces of infrastructure are damaged. Let's not forget the lives and lost equipment from thinking this technology is the answer. You must be born with an aptitude to perform these jobs. The vision and just the experience of being able to feel and differentiate what you're about to rip out of the ground with a machine that has a massive amount of power is what is important. To you computer engineers you don't know what you don't know. I promise I won't start writing code if you don't start operating equipment Ps. How much dirt do you have on you hands and shoes?
Smokey_Bear
David, machines are already doing this work, WITHOUT a human even controlling it. I promise you, a machine will be a better operator then you, in every sense of the word. Can you work 24/7? no breaks, no fatigue, We have new companies sprouting up, who's jobs are to take the human out of the cab. Which is good. Humans shouldn't be working some job for 50 years, only to finally relax/retire when they are too old to do anything fun. Companies like Gravis Robotics, Bedrock Robotics, AIM Intelligent Machines, and it's not just retrofitting tech on old equipment, you also have new companies like Lumina, which are designing & building brand new electric/autonomous equipment.
Gordien
How much information are these designing engineers getting from medical robo-surgery equipment engineers? We can have the kids performing operations in weeks. A kid in India might still be able to get more beans into the hopper than Old Joe on the backhoe. Some times it's not safe being on a piece of equipment, so remote operation could be a real plus. Equipment with no operator cab. Mini units for digging out survivors. The field's wide open. It really is enjoyable to operate hydraulic controls - it feels like an arm, but you don't have to break any fingernails.
Ancliff
One thing is for sure. After watching dear old Jeremy Clarkson struggling to comprehend the controls on a modern tractor, it's super obvious that this type of technology is directly and immediately required for modern machinery of that nature across the board.