Science

Coal-to-protein livestock feed uses 1/1000th as much land as farming

Coal-to-protein livestock feed uses 1/1000th as much land as farming
Researchers have created what they say is a cost-effective way to create livestock feed proteins from coal
Researchers have created what they say is a cost-effective way to create livestock feed proteins from coal
View 3 Images
Researchers have created what they say is a cost-effective way to create livestock feed proteins from coal
1/3
Researchers have created what they say is a cost-effective way to create livestock feed proteins from coal
More than a quarter of the Earth's entire dry land mass is currently used to grow plants for livestock feed and grazing
2/3
More than a quarter of the Earth's entire dry land mass is currently used to grow plants for livestock feed and grazing
The Pichia pastoris yeast, engineered for superior methanol tolerance and conversion efficiency
3/3
The Pichia pastoris yeast, engineered for superior methanol tolerance and conversion efficiency
View gallery - 3 images

Chinese scientists have developed a cost-effective method of converting coal into protein, which they say could feed livestock much more efficiently than natural plants, while using a tiny fraction of the land.

According to Our World in Data, grazing land for livestock and farming land for animal feed production combine to take up an astonishing 40 million square kilometers (15.4 million square miles) of land. That's well over a quarter of the Earth's entire dry land area, and nearly 40% of the land defined as "habitable."

This is one of the reasons the meat-heavy Western diet is under fire as environmentally unsustainable; growing plants to feed animals makes wretchedly inefficient use of land, which could otherwise be left as forest or used for other purposes.

More than a quarter of the Earth's entire dry land mass is currently used to grow plants for livestock feed and grazing
More than a quarter of the Earth's entire dry land mass is currently used to grow plants for livestock feed and grazing

One solution is moving toward lab-grown meat – but another may be to start producing protein for livestock feed using other methods. This would be a particular boon to China. According to Biotech researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the country is currently forced to import around 80% of its protein raw materials in the form of soybeans and the like – and that's a serious food security issue for the nation.

So the team set about research into processes that could use fossil fuels to produce proteins, building on oil-to-protein biotechnology pioneered by BP as far back as the 1960s.

The CAS team's process works something like this: firstly, coal is transformed into methanol via gasification – a technique that can now be executed with near-zero carbon emissions. That methanol is then fed to a special strain of Pichia pastoris yeast, which ferments the methanol to produce a single-cell protein complete with a range of amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, fats and carbohydrates. The resulting organism is much richer in protein than plants are, and it can be used to partially replace fish, soybeans, meat and skimmed milk in a range of animal feeds.

The team's key innovation was in selecting and genetically engineering the yeast strain, making it more able to tolerate the toxic effects of methanol than previous strains in order to maximize conversion efficiency and minimize the amount of carbon lost during the process.

The Pichia pastoris yeast, engineered for superior methanol tolerance and conversion efficiency
The Pichia pastoris yeast, engineered for superior methanol tolerance and conversion efficiency

The result: a yeast that converts methanol into protein at a remarkable 92% of the maximum theoretical yield of the process. That, says the team, makes it "a cost-effective option for the industrial production of protein."

According to the South China Morning Post, the researchers have already hooked up with an undisclosed manufacturing partner to start industrial-scale demonstrations that have already produced "thousands of tonnes of this protein in a plant."

The research is open access in the journal Biotechnology for Biofuels.

Source: SCMP via Interesting Engineering

View gallery - 3 images
20 comments
20 comments
Rick O
Just no. I tried to read the article with an open mind, but this is just absurd. It's an interesting scientific achievement, but this should not be in mass production unless there is zero chance of doing it naturally. This is the extreme opposite of organic food.
jzj
"That methanol is then fed to a special strain of Pichia pastoris yeast, which ferments the methanol to produce a single-cell protein complete with a range of amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, fats and carbohydrates."
Extraordinary claim. Where's the extraordinary evidence?
Username
IF it's suitable for live stock it should be suitable for humans. Live stock is an inefficient step in food production whether it's plants or any other source.
Adrian Akau
I agree with jzj "where is the evidence?" Nitrogen would have to be introduced to produce the amino acids. The CPC (government of China) sometimes makes claims that are not accurate but are given for political purposes.
DaveWesely
Interesting article. What should be understood in the graph is that of the 77% of ag land for animal feed, most of it is for pasture. Pasture or range land cannot be used for crop land due to lack of moisture and soil quality. So if we eliminated ruminants and other grass eating animals, the 23% remaining wouldn't change much.

Since protein is primarily nitrogen, the yeast must capture it from the air, or be supplemented in the growth medium. Coal is primarily carbon. Turn it into food and it is respired as CO2 into the atmosphere.
Max Blancke
I do not understand why people think grazing land is suitable for farming plants. Beyond that, livestock can use the same land as herds of elk and pretty much any native plant or animal species. To farm that land, you need to clear it, plow it, irrigate it, fertilize it, and keep animals and insects away from the crops.
Most of the land used for grazing is just not suitable for that.
b@man
Ridiculously bad idea! We need grass fed beef, with all the nutrients and minerals, not a Chinese Pop Tart.
ScienceFan
Soon you can Carbon date your food to see if coal was used as feed. Next step is to eliminate animals entirely. Who would have thought we would be eating coal. Sound like a terrible movie script.
harry van trotsenburg
Pour cattle, pour humans who eat that cattle
martinwinlow
"...which they say could feed livestock much more efficiently than natural plants." ... and unlocking vast amounts of CO2 in the process. In what possible way is this sustainable? Haven't they heard of 'climate change'? This may be a more efficient process in terms of not generating as much CO2 to make animal-based protien but it's still 'burning' coal!!
Load More