Aircraft

Donut airship with dangling cockpit is one wild but purposeful ride

Donut airship with dangling cockpit is one wild but purposeful ride
The aérOnde boasts a five-hour flight time
The aérOnde boasts a five-hour flight time
View 5 Images
The vehicle is steered by three arrays of four propellers each
1/5
The vehicle is steered by three arrays of four propellers each
The aérOnde boasts a five-hour flight time
2/5
The aérOnde boasts a five-hour flight time
The aircraft can reportedly reach speeds of 25 to 30 km/h (16 to 19 mph)
3/5
The aircraft can reportedly reach speeds of 25 to 30 km/h (16 to 19 mph)
The two-person aérOnde features an open cockpit
4/5
The two-person aérOnde features an open cockpit
The aérOnde eVTOL/mini airship in flight
5/5
The aérOnde eVTOL/mini airship in flight
View gallery - 5 images

If you’re a longtime viewer of The Simpsons, then you know at least two things about Homer: he loves doughnuts, and he’s an absolutely terrible designer of vehicles. But that doesn’t mean no one should ever combine vehicle design with doughnuts, as French company aérOnde has shown us with its aérOnde (“Air-Round”) airship that looks like a giant, flying doughnut covered in white icing.

So, why would anyone bother to make a giant, white, doughnut-shaped aircraft? Aren’t airplanes, helicopters, gliders, blimps, zeppelins, and rockets already doing a great job of moving people through the atmosphere? Well, yes and no. Several of those vehicles burn massive amounts of extremely expensive fuel and release giant volumes of carbon dioxide. Airplanes alone cause approximately 2.4% of annual global CO2 emissions.

Airships, on the other hand, emit little carbon because their vertical lift comes from lighter-than-air gases such as helium instead of burning fuel during diagonal ascent, and their propeller propulsion can be entirely electric. And while they’re much slower than airplanes, the big ones really deserve the name airships for their massive carrying capacity of passengers and/or cargo: close to 220,000 lb (100,000 kg).

The vehicle is steered by three arrays of four propellers each
The vehicle is steered by three arrays of four propellers each

For those general reasons, the aérOnde from designer and CEO Jérôme Delamare is a very tasty confection indeed. Winner of France’s i-Lab competition and based partly on work at the Grenoble Electrical Engineering Laboratory (G2ELab), the aérOnde uses completely electric motors and around 106,000 gallons (400 m3) of helium for its vertical take-off and landing, meaning it’s an eVTOL.

Now, while you wouldn’t expect anything nicknamed a doughnut to do the work of a cargo ship, the 33-foot (15-m)-wide aérOnde is more than capable of performing important labour. Using three arrays of four propellers each, the vehicle has “a five-hour flight time and can reach speeds of 25 to 30 km/h [16 to 19 mph] in all directions, with a payload of 200 kg [440 lb],” Delamare told Presences. “All this, without any noise and with very low energy consumption” – a total of 1 kWh (about $1.17) per hour of flight, compared with a helicopter’s use of 48 gallons (180 L) of kerosene for the same flight time.

The aérOnde eVTOL/mini airship in flight
The aérOnde eVTOL/mini airship in flight

As you can see in the following video (if you can’t understand spoken or typed French, set the subtitles to English), the silent, two-person aérOnde features an open cockpit (like a ski-hill chair lift, rather than a hot-air balloon’s basket) allowing the crew to perform high-altitude repairs, for instance, of power lines, gondolas, or transmission towers, and its application for emergency or medical rescue is obvious. As well, the aérOnde needs only a few hours to recharge.

"Silencieux, aérien, léger" : à quoi sert ce donut géant qui survole les environs de Grenoble ?

Because of the aérOnde's toroidal shape, wind has less ability to blow it off-course than it does against a balloon, even at gusts of 44 mph (70 km/h), so whether people are piloting it for work, leisure, observation, or rescue, the vehicle offers stability. As this second video shows, the airship, piloted with the simple use of a joystick, moves with such stunning grace and precision that it made me say, “Wow!” aloud in my bland, motionless, non-helium writing room.

Une autre facon de voler

Want to ride an aérOnde? For now, you’ll need to go to France to do that, and a 20-minute ride isn’t cheap: €200 (about $US234) per flight. The company website doesn’t give a price to rent or buy one – sorry, Homer.

Source: aérOnde

View gallery - 5 images
9 comments
9 comments
Tristan P
Cool. I'd love to try that some time.
paul314
Does it have automatic positioning so that the pilot can stop using the joystick once in position?
Username
I anything begged to be covered in solar panels it's this!
RandD
Did you mean 10 kWh for $1.17? It looks a little unsafe to not have helmets. 😱
rgbatduke
Wow, something that is actually a super-good idea! USED professional grade helicopters sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Fuel alone costs over $100/hour for anything that isn't tiny. Utility companies routinely rent or own helicopters and expensive pilots and crews just so they can drop repair/maintenance people onto high voltage transmission line (I've watched them work after hurricanes in NC, but there are some amazing youtube videos online as well).
This looks like it would fill that niche permanently at a fraction of the cost of either ownership or operation. No license needed to pilot it (or a very minimal/specialized one). Fuel a few dollars an hour at most. The helium probably isn't cheap (and will diffuse through the envelope of the torus, sadly) but if they pump it down and inflate it only when they need it, they can keep helium replacement costs under control. I'm guessing you could buy one ready to fly for $100,000 or so, maybe less, lose half of your staff and a major chunk of operational costs, all the more so if you can pilot them by remote control so that you can have one man on the ground to drop off the line maintenance person and pick him up down the line.
And that's NOT thinking about recreational uses, military uses (probably has a low radar profile unless the torus has a foil lining to retard the loss of helium), search and rescue, resource prospecting, even "traffic reports" currently generated by helicopter crews daily for local TV. Ball game videography -- cheaper than the Goodyear Blimp.
libblue
This seems very sustainable, even beautiful. future huge donuts flying over mountains, self charging via solar nrgy.
Rustgecko
Great - until there’s a wind.
GG
Fabulous idea. If you're going to invest in designing that inflatable, you might as well try imbedding those propulsion units in the inflatable structure. You might see a benefit to thrust within a shaped cavity/tunnel.
HokenPoke
Exactly @Rustgecko, and i know its not anything to be concerned about, but i always have a sense of something going to pop a balloon whenever i see one flying, its actually such a fragile thing.