Aircraft

CycloTech reveals outdoor noise level from its CycloRotor propellers

CycloTech reveals outdoor noise level from its CycloRotor propellers
Voith-Schneider CycloRotors are capable of vectoring thrust nearly instantly in 360 degrees, while rotating at a constant rate
Voith-Schneider propellers are capable of vectoring thrust nearly instantly in 360 degrees, while rotating at a constant rate
View 5 Images
Voith-Schneider CycloRotors are capable of vectoring thrust nearly instantly in 360 degrees, while rotating at a constant rate
1/5
Voith-Schneider propellers are capable of vectoring thrust nearly instantly in 360 degrees, while rotating at a constant rate
Cyclotech's 83 kg technology demonstrator aircraft, set up for thrust testing on a vertical pole
2/5
Cyclotech's 83 kg technology demonstrator aircraft, set up for thrust testing on a vertical pole
An eVTOL aircraft concept shows how these propulsion units might come to the air taxi world
3/5
An eVTOL aircraft concept shows how these propulsion units might come to the air taxi world
The tech demonstrator has now been given the nod for outdoor flight testing
4/5
The tech demonstrator has now been given the nod for outdoor flight testing
An array of microphones set up for acoustic testing
5/5
An array of microphones set up for acoustic testing
View gallery - 5 images

Having received permission from Austrian authorities to begin outdoor flight testing on its remarkable CycloRotor-propelled technology demonstrator, CycloTech has announced noise testing results for its 360-degree thrust vectoring propulsion barrels.

CycloTech is one of very few companies looking beyond the humble propeller, pitch-controllable rotor or ducted fan to provide thrust for electric VTOL aircraft and drones. Instead, it uses a series of spinning barrels.

These CycloRotor barrels are known as Voith-Schneider propellers, and they spin at a reasonably constant rate when an aircraft is off the ground, rather than needing to constantly speed up and slow down like the propellers on a drone do to keep it balanced in changing wind conditions.

Instead, the walls of the barrels are a series of blades, and these blades can be pitch-controlled throughout the rotation of the barrel, allowing for near-instant changes in the magnitude and direction of thrust through 360 degrees.

Cyclotech | Cyclogyro Principle

Blade pitch control is handled by a central hub that works a bit like the swashplate in a helicopter; when it's moved off-axis, it changes the pitch of all blades as the barrel rotates, such that the thrust remains constant when the hub is staying still.

One advantage of this kind of idea is that it doesn't necessarily require electric motors spinning the barrels, because it doesn't need massive amounts of instant torque to stabilize an aircraft. You could run the thing on combustion engines, and presumably make yourself a much longer-endurance aircraft.

CycloTech First Flight

Progress hasn't exactly been at lightning speed here. CycloTech made the first tethered flights (above) with its 83-kg (183-lb) technology demonstrator more than a year and a half ago, and since then, it's been radio silence apart from a super-weird cargo drone concept it put together in conjunction with Japanese delivery company Yamato.

But there are two bits of recent news worth mentioning. Firstly, in March, CycloTech announced it had received permission from Austro Control, the Austrian aviation safety authority, to start flying the demonstrator outside.

“The Operational Authorization for the outdoor flight test campaign is a major milestone and will be key to demonstrate the CycloRotor technology to the aviation world.” said Deva Harsha Yarramshetti, Flight Test Engineer at CycloTech, in a press release.

The tech demonstrator has now been given the nod for outdoor flight testing
The tech demonstrator has now been given the nod for outdoor flight testing

And now, the company says it's completed an extensive outdoor noise testing campaign for the propulsion system at the Wels General Aviation Airport in Austria.

Noise is crucial to eVTOL aircraft designs. If they're going to democratize vertical flight and become the ubiquitous air taxis of the world, they need to be vastly quieter and cheaper than helicopters. So CycloTech stuck a propulsion barrel on a test stand and took a bunch of readings, reporting that "the CycloRotor generates a sound pressure level of 59 dBA at a distance of 100 meters (328 ft), which is equivalent to the level of a typical conversation between two people."

It's hard to put this result in context, though. For starters, the barrel was mounted on a vertical axis, so the thrust couldn't be vectored downward like it'd typically be in any eVTOL aircraft. Secondly, it's not clear which direction it was vectored toward relative to the microphone array.

An array of microphones set up for acoustic testing
An array of microphones set up for acoustic testing

Thirdly, well, there was only one of them, where a full-sized eVTOL aircraft will probably run six or eight for the sake of redundancy. And it was also a fairly small one – presumably, the CR-42 CycloRotor, whose maximum thrust of 253 N (~57 lbf) is nowhere near what each of a Joby S4's big tilting propellers put out.

We bring up the S4 because back in May last year, Joby became the first eVTOL company to release genuine noise figures for a full-size air taxi prototype. Working with a team from NASA, Joby measured the S4 from the same 100-m distance as CycloTech, and found over more than 20 takeoff and landing cycles, the noise level from its six large propellers never rose over 65 dBA.

Cyclotech's 83 kg technology demonstrator aircraft, set up for thrust testing on a vertical pole
Cyclotech's 83 kg technology demonstrator aircraft, set up for thrust testing on a vertical pole

So while the CycloTech system is much earlier in development than the Joby aircraft, it seems reasonable to estimate that the CycloRotor propulsion barrels are likely to prove significantly noisier than regular ol' propellers once scaled up to full air taxi size – assuming that this is where this kind of tech will end up.

Check out the noise testing in the video below, which remarkably contains no audio from the tests. The first flight video above, however, lets you listen in a bit.

CycloRotor | Outdoor Noise Test 2022

Source: CycloTech

View gallery - 5 images
14 comments
14 comments
Robert
One wonders what problem does it try to solve. Helicopter is complicated but efficient, drones are inefficient but simple and cheap. This is complexity of 4 helicopters in one, neither simple nor efficient.
reader
Tip speed is lower so noise will be lower.
JamesFeeney
I saw something like this for a boat propeller system. Could this be modified to catch wind energy (the opposite of propelling)?
Towerman
@Robert
There is no problem and it is efficient, the drums don't require a lot of energy to turn compared to other propulsion methods the technology has already been proven. Its a ingenious concept.
Towerman
Yes its no secret. Though i prefer concepts like Joby and Skai. I have a sweet spot for the cyclorotor. It just looks Right. I cant wait for it to commercialize. And there is no doubt whatsoever that it will pioneer a niche market in its own right ! Please keep us updated Loz
jeronimo
@James. In the 1970s there were 2 different wind energy projects that used this method. There was the Pinson Cycloturbine and the Giromill. Just google Giromill Overview and the first link is a PDF of the test report. You can google the Pinson Cycloturbine report as well. It's great that people are scanning these old test reports and putting them in the library in the sky.
MDR
OK
Once again, a video that's meant to highlight the low noise potential of an invention, yet includes an overpowering music track.
Hello?
MDR
Laszlo KRUPPA
Of course it is kind of funny reporting about a noise test using silent videos. But still, in case of the Cyclorotor it is not the soundtrack one would miss the most. Actually a simple efficiency diagram would be great to see for this new type of proposed VTOL propulsion. So one could compare it, at least superficially with that of the "humble" propeller. Chances are the 60% figure on this chart ( https://1drv.ms/i/s!AsD1VBemxG3AzUU1eQRcYWO6XphY?e=k0fyiK ) could seem too high if the prop is replaced by a Cyclorotor.
paul314
Just a reminder: sound level typically decreases by 6 db for every doubling of distance. So by the time you get within 5 meters of this thing you're in the 80-90 db range. No jet-engine loud, but still pretty darn loud.
Towerman
Noise is a factor that can be refined over time via many factors that would be too long to list here, just get it commercially in the air already, as it stands it will be quiet enough for a first model release !
Load More