Aircraft

Hybrid jet engines work to excel where pure-electric jets fail

Hybrid jet engines work to excel where pure-electric jets fail
GE Aerospace's hybrid-electric jet engine in the ground testing rig
GE Aerospace's hybrid-electric jet engine in the ground testing rig
View 1 Image
GE Aerospace's hybrid-electric jet engine in the ground testing rig
1/1
GE Aerospace's hybrid-electric jet engine in the ground testing rig

A hybrid-electric jet engine may seem as absurd as a horse-drawn Zeppelin, but GE Aerospace is ground testing a new megawatt-class hybrid turbofan engine and its full powertrain that is powerful enough to run a medium-haul narrow-body airliner.

Aerospace engineers have been putting a lot of effort into developing electric propulsion systems for aircraft but even after over half a century of work they keep hitting a wall. Electric motors, for all their advantages, depend on an outside power source to function. And that's where things go pear shaped.

If an aircraft propelled by electric motors is powered by, for example, batteries, that's a real problem. Batteries have an energy density that is 1/50th of aviation fuel, so it takes 50 pounds of batteries to do the work of one pound of aviation fuel. Worse, as aviation fuel is burned up, the aircraft gets lighter. A battery-powered aircraft remains the same weight from takeoff to landing, which is not good.

What this boils down to is that heavier-than-air, passenger-carrying electric aircraft can only go in one of two directions. Either they have to be ultra-light soaring planes that rely on solar panels to act as what are essentially powered gliders, or they have to be content with very short ranges and very small payloads.

So why is GE able to build a hybrid-electric jet engine big enough to be installed in a Boeing 737? The answer is that the electric component of the powertrain is meant to supplement the turbofan jet, not supplant it.

Developed as part of NASA’s Electrified Powertrain Flight Demonstration (EPFD) project and the Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core (HyTEC) program, the new design incorporates components that act as both motors and generators in the core of the jet engine. These are coupled to the engine shaft and can be used to both turn the turbofan or charge batteries and power onboard electrical systems. This arrangement eliminates the need for an auxiliary engine or bleeding air to generate electricity.

According to the company, it operates in a number of different modes. The generation mode is used when in low-demand flight phases like descent or taxiing. During this, the electric motor/generators (EMGs) generate high-voltage DC electricity to recharge onboard batteries and run subsystems. Meanwhile, the motor mode kicks in during takeoff and climbing. This is when the EMGs use stored power to help turn the engine shaft to boost fan and compressor rotation without using additional fuel.

Because the system operates on a megawatt scale the silicon carbide power inverters generate a lot of heat, so a dedicated cooling system is needed to transfer the heat from the electrics to the fuel, which acts like a heat sink.

In the latest ground tests using a modified GE Passport turbofan engine, the system was put through various different modes during which GE says it demonstrated narrow-body hybrid operation, including without intermediate batteries. In addition, it was put through what is called a replicated flight environment to make sure the electrical systems could handle the thermal and vibrational stresses it would meet when in service.

"Hybrid electric propulsion is central to how GE Aerospace is redefining the future of flight," said Arjan Hegeman, vice president of future of flight for GE Aerospace. "Our latest milestone successfully demonstrated a narrow-body hybrid electric engine architecture that doesn’t require energy storage to operate. It’s a critical step to making hybrid electric flight a reality for commercial aviation with technologies that meet customer needs for greater efficiency, durability, and range."

Source: GE Aerospace

8 comments
8 comments
Ed
This article is a bit confusing. It mentions using motor/generators to charge onboard batteries and later mentions running tests without intermediate batteries. The article ends suggesting (confusingly) that this system can operate without on-board batteries for electrical energy storage. Um, that doesn't compute.
TechGazer
Another option for electric aircraft: beamed power. I don't know what the economics of that are given present technology. If it's close to that of fueled aircraft, it could start with a route that has a lot of traffic, then spreads out from there. Long-range routes might wait for satellite beamed power.
While it might not make direct economic sense, if you factor in all the costs with burning fossil fuels, maybe it's a good choice.
JS
@Ed - I think the article is saying that they demonstrated the plane without using batteries because it can function, in part at least, without batteries.
Spud Murphy
I'm with Ed, this makes no sense, all hybrid systems need some form of battery, there's no way to power the motor/generators as motors without batteries, and there's no point them being generators if there's nowhere to dump the power generated without batteries. Clearly, the author didn't understand the system they were writing about.
michael_dowling
They didn't mention liquid H2,which is being flight tested NOW by some startups. NASA is also considering such propulsion for it's blended body airliner layout. H2 would run generators which would power electric ducted fans. Google Zeroavia.
Steven Mandell
Doesn't even mention the expected fuel savings. Hence no way to judge if it is worth all the bother. I drive the first hybrid car, that is obviously not a plug in hybrid. It works well for increasing gas milage, but there is not a whole lot of need for decelerating once you are in the air. So the question of applicability is the 800 pound gorilla they are not talking about left standing in the middle of the room.
DaveWesely
This is good! We are finally talking about better integrating fuel and batteries to better take advantage of their attributes. @Ed, would you want your airplane to lose power because an electric cable came loose? Don't be confused, it's called fail safe testing. Now we need to put that same thought process to use in cars. Electric motors are much better at powering the wheels than gas engines. The inverse applies with cabin and battery pack heating, which is why the range on EVs drops so much in the winter. The solution is simple - use LP (camping/grill) gas to heat the cabin/batteries. But we live in a black and white world where the two don't mix. It's time to get over ourselves and do what works best.
JNC
Ed, I could guess that GE Aerospace may be trying to see if there are system efficiencies available from shutting down one engine core in flight and powering both fans from one engine so the EMG in one engine provides power to the other EMG (with no batteries). GE has land-based experience in self-synchronizing couplings to allow power turbine disconnection/reconnection. Obviously, this would require sufficient altitude so that there would be multiple opportunities to restart the shut-down engine while still airborne in the event of first engine shutdown. One core problem with a Joule/Brayton cycle is the high Willan's-line crossover of up to 20% fuel for zero output just to run the compressor and turbine. Shutting one core down while keeping both fans running might result in the 10% fuel savings which is a tremendous increase as far as the aviation industry is concerned. This seems to be a technology development program to find out if it is feasible. I suspect it would be quite a while before the FAA might be convinced of the reliability of such a solution. 1MW at cruise altitude in a high-altitude-fuel-cooled SiC power converter could result in a small package (Think Tesla drive sizes even at the much higher continuous powers).
Thus, this system could indeed operate without batteries for energy storage, though that might be stretching the conventional (but not dictionary) definition of hybrid engine.